Langeslag Sandra J E, van Strien Jan W
Department of Psychological Sciences, University of Missouri - St. Louis, United States.
Department of Psychology, Education and Child Studies, Erasmus University Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Brain Res. 2018 Jan 1;1678:297-303. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2017.10.031. Epub 2017 Nov 2.
Snakes and angry faces are common fear stimuli and both elicit an Early Posterior Negativity (EPN) in the event-related potential, which indicates that they capture early automatic visual attention. But because snakes have been a predatory threat for primates since long before communication through facial expressions evolved, we tested the hypothesis that the EPN for snakes would be more pronounced than the EPN for angry faces. We carefully controlled for differences between reptiles and faces by using lizards and neutral faces as control stimuli. Participants viewed a rapid serial visual presentation of snakes (i.e., threatening reptiles), lizards (i.e., non-threatening reptiles), angry faces (i.e., threatening humans), and neutral faces (i.e., non-threatening humans). EPNs for snakes (vs. lizards) and angry (vs. neutral) faces started to develop around 120 ms after stimulus onset. The EPN was of the same size for snakes and angry faces between 150-225 ms, but was larger for snakes than for angry faces between 225-300 ms, which suggests that snakes capture more extensive early automatic attention than angry faces. These findings correspond with the notion that the visual system is specifically tuned to detect snakes because of the prolonged pressure of snakes on primate evolution.
蛇和愤怒的面孔是常见的恐惧刺激物,两者都会在事件相关电位中引发早期后负波(EPN),这表明它们能吸引早期自动视觉注意。但是由于早在通过面部表情进行交流进化之前,蛇就一直是灵长类动物的捕食性威胁,我们测试了这样一个假设,即对蛇的EPN比对愤怒面孔的EPN更明显。我们通过使用蜥蜴和中性面孔作为对照刺激,仔细控制了爬行动物和面孔之间的差异。参与者观看了蛇(即具有威胁性的爬行动物)、蜥蜴(即无威胁性的爬行动物)、愤怒面孔(即具有威胁性的人类)和中性面孔(即无威胁性的人类)的快速序列视觉呈现。对蛇(与蜥蜴相比)和愤怒面孔(与中性面孔相比)的EPN在刺激开始后约120毫秒左右开始出现。在150 - 225毫秒之间,蛇和愤怒面孔的EPN大小相同,但在225 - 300毫秒之间,蛇的EPN比愤怒面孔的更大,这表明蛇比愤怒面孔能吸引更广泛的早期自动注意。这些发现与以下观点相符,即由于蛇在灵长类动物进化过程中长期施加的压力,视觉系统经过专门调整以检测蛇。