Department of Health Management and Systems Sciences, School of Public Health and Information Sciences, University of Louisville, Louisville, Kentucky.
Department of Health Services Management and Policy, College of Public Health, Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio.
J Rural Health. 2018 Mar;34(2):213-222. doi: 10.1111/jrh.12284. Epub 2017 Nov 6.
Medicaid expansions, prompted by the Affordable Care Act, generated generally positive effects on coverage and alleviated much of the financial burden associated with seeking health care. We do not know if these shifts also extend to the nation's rural populations.
Using 2011-2015 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System data, this study compares trend changes for coverage, access to care, and health care utilization in response to Medicaid expansion among urban and rural residents using a difference-in-differences regression approach.
Following Medicaid expansion, low-income rural and urban residents both experienced reductions in uninsurance; however, the coverage uptake in rural settings (8.5 percentage points [pp], P < .01) was much larger than the uptake in coverage in more urban settings (4.1 pp, P > .10). In spite of larger uptakes in coverage among rural residents, reductions in cost-related barriers to medical care were slightly larger among urban residents, and access to a regular source of medical care (5.2 pp, P < .05) and doctor visitation (4.5 pp, P < .01) were only statistically significant among urban residents.
The ACA Medicaid expansions produced larger gains in coverage for rural residents than urban residents; however, it appears there remain opportunities to improve access to care among potentially vulnerable rural residents.
平价医疗法案推动的医疗补助计划扩大,对覆盖范围产生了普遍的积极影响,并减轻了与寻求医疗保健相关的大部分经济负担。我们不知道这些转变是否也会扩展到全国的农村人口。
本研究使用 2011-2015 年行为风险因素监测系统数据,采用差异中差异回归方法,比较了城市和农村居民在医疗补助计划扩大后的覆盖范围、获得医疗服务的机会和医疗服务利用方面的趋势变化。
在医疗补助计划扩大后,低收入农村和城市居民的未参保率都有所下降;然而,农村地区的参保率上升幅度(8.5 个百分点,P<0.01)明显大于城市地区(4.1 个百分点,P>0.10)。尽管农村居民的参保率上升幅度较大,但城市居民的医疗费用相关障碍减少幅度略大,而获得常规医疗服务(5.2 个百分点,P<0.05)和看医生(4.5 个百分点,P<0.01)的机会仅在城市居民中具有统计学意义。
平价医疗法案的医疗补助计划扩大为农村居民带来了比城市居民更大的覆盖范围收益;然而,似乎仍有机会改善农村弱势群体获得医疗服务的机会。