Golan Olivia K, Sheng Flora, Dick Andrew W, Sorbero Mark, Whitaker Daniel J, Andraka-Christou Barbara, Pigott Therese, Gordon Adam J, Stein Bradley D
NORC at the University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States.
School of Public Health, Georgia State University, Atlanta, Georgia.
Drug Alcohol Depend Rep. 2023 Oct 11;9:100193. doi: 10.1016/j.dadr.2023.100193. eCollection 2023 Dec.
Although use of buprenorphine for treating opioid use disorder increased over the past decade, buprenorphine utilization remains limited in lower-income and rural areas. We examine how the Affordable Care Act Medicaid expansion influenced buprenorphine initiation rates by county income and evaluate how associations differ by county rural-urban status.
This study used nationwide 2009-2018 IQVIA retail pharmacy data and a comparative interrupted time series framework-a hybrid framework combining regression discontinuity and difference-in-difference approaches. We used piecewise linear estimation to quantify changes in buprenorphine initiation rates before and after Medicaid expansion.
The sample included observations from 376,704 county-months. We identified 5,227,340 new buprenorphine treatment episodes, with an average of 9.2 new buprenorphine episodes per month per 100,000 county residents. Among urban counties, those with the lowest median incomes experienced significantly larger increases in buprenorphine initiation rates associated with Medicaid expansion than counties with higher median incomes (5-year rates difference est=3525.3, se=1695.3, = 0.04). However, among rural counties, there was no significant association between buprenorphine initiation rates and county median income after Medicaid expansion (5-year rates difference est=979.0, se=915.8, = 0.29).
Medicaid expansion was associated with a reduction in income-related buprenorphine disparities in urban counties, but not in rural counties. To achieve more equitable buprenorphine access, future policies should target low-income rural areas.
尽管在过去十年中,丁丙诺啡用于治疗阿片类物质使用障碍的情况有所增加,但在低收入和农村地区,丁丙诺啡的使用仍然有限。我们研究了《平价医疗法案》中的医疗补助扩大计划如何根据县收入水平影响丁丙诺啡的起始率,并评估了这些关联在城乡不同县之间的差异。
本研究使用了2009 - 2018年全国IQVIA零售药房数据以及一个比较性中断时间序列框架——一种结合了回归断点和差异中的差异方法的混合框架。我们使用分段线性估计来量化医疗补助扩大计划前后丁丙诺啡起始率的变化。
样本包括来自376,704个县月的观测数据。我们确定了5,227,340个新的丁丙诺啡治疗疗程,平均每10万名县居民每月有9.2个新的丁丙诺啡治疗疗程。在城市县中,收入中位数最低的县与医疗补助扩大计划相关的丁丙诺啡起始率增幅明显大于收入中位数较高的县(5年利率差异估计值 = 3525.3,标准误 = 1695.3,P = 0.04)。然而,在农村县中,医疗补助扩大计划后丁丙诺啡起始率与县收入中位数之间没有显著关联(5年利率差异估计值 = 979.0,标准误 = 915.8,P = 0.29)。
医疗补助扩大计划与城市县中与收入相关的丁丙诺啡差异减少有关,但与农村县无关。为了实现更公平地获取丁丙诺啡,未来政策应针对低收入农村地区。