School of Physical Therapy, University of Brasilia, Distrito Federal, Brazil.
School of Medicine, University of Brasilia, Distrito Federal, Brazil.
PM R. 2018 Apr;10(4):398-409. doi: 10.1016/j.pmrj.2017.09.014. Epub 2017 Oct 27.
Several interventions have been proposed to rehabilitate patients with neurologic dysfunctions due to stroke. However, the effectiveness of circuit-based exercises according to its actual definition, ie, an overall program to improve strength, stamina, balance or functioning, was not provided.
To examine the effectiveness of circuit-based exercise in the treatment of people affected by stroke.
A search through PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Physiotherapy Evidence Database databases was performed to identify controlled clinical trials without language or date restriction. The overall mean difference with 95% confidence interval was calculated for all outcomes. Two independent reviewers assessed the risk of bias.
Eleven studies met the inclusion criteria, and 8 presented suitable data to perform a meta-analysis. Quantitative analysis showed that circuit-based exercise was more effective than conventional intervention on gait speed (mean difference of 0.11 m/s) and circuit-based exercise was not significantly more effective than conventional intervention on balance and functional mobility.
Our results demonstrated that circuit-based exercise presents better effects on gait when compared with conventional intervention and that its effects on balance and functional mobility were not better than conventional interventions.
I.
已有多种干预措施被提出用于康复因中风而导致神经功能障碍的患者。然而,并未提供基于回路的锻炼的有效性,即根据其实际定义,即改善力量、耐力、平衡或功能的综合计划。
检验基于回路的锻炼在治疗中风患者中的有效性。
通过对 PubMed、Embase、Cochrane 图书馆和 Physiotherapy Evidence Database 数据库进行检索,在无语言或日期限制的情况下识别出对照临床试验。对所有结局进行了总体均数差值和 95%置信区间的计算。两名独立的审查员评估了偏倚风险。
11 项研究符合纳入标准,8 项研究提供了适合进行荟萃分析的数据。定量分析表明,基于回路的锻炼在步态速度方面比常规干预更有效(平均差值为 0.11m/s),而在平衡和功能移动性方面,基于回路的锻炼并不比常规干预更有效。
我们的结果表明,与常规干预相比,基于回路的锻炼在步态方面有更好的效果,而在平衡和功能移动性方面的效果并不优于常规干预。
I。