Suppr超能文献

《艰难对话》:多专业培训评估

'Difficult Conversations': evaluation of multiprofessional training.

作者信息

Brighton Lisa Jane, Selman Lucy Ellen, Gough Nicholas, Nadicksbernd J J, Bristowe Katherine, Millington-Sanders Catherine, Koffman Jonathan

机构信息

Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy and Rehabilitation, King's College London, London, UK.

Population HealthSciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.

出版信息

BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2018 Mar;8(1):45-48. doi: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2017-001447. Epub 2017 Nov 8.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Evidence-based communication skills training for health and social care professionals is essential to improve the care of seriously ill patients and their families. We aimed to evaluate the self-reported impact of 'Difficult Conversations', a multidisciplinary half-day interactive workshop, and gain feedback to inform future development and evaluation.

METHODS

Service evaluation using questionnaire data collected before and immediately after workshops from February 2015 to August 2016 regarding participant self-assessed confidence, knowledge and skills. Qualitative free-text comments provided feedback about the workshop and were subjected to content analysis.

RESULTS

Of 886 workshop participants, 655 completed baseline questionnaires and 714 postworkshop questionnaires; 550 were matched pairs. Participants were qualified or trainee general practitioners (34%), community nurses and care coordinators (32%), social care professionals (7%), care home staff (6%), advanced practice/specialist nurses (5%), care workers (5%) and allied health professionals (3%). All groups demonstrated significant increases in mean self-assessed confidence (2.46, 95% CI 2.41 to 2.51; to 3.20, 95% CI 3.17 to 3.24; P<0.001), knowledge (2.22, 95% CI 2.17 to 2.27; to 3.18, 95% CI 3.14 to 3.22; P<0.001) and skills (2.37, 95% CI 2.32 to 2.42; to 3.09, 95% CI 3.05 to 3.12; P<0.001). Qualitative findings showed participants valued role play, the communication framework acronym and opportunities for discussion. They commended workshop facilitators' skills, the safe atmosphere and interprofessional learning. Suggested improvements included more prepared role play and greater coverage of the taught topics.

CONCLUSIONS

'Difficult Conversations' workshops were associated with improvements in participants' self-assessed confidence, knowledge, and skills. Our findings identify workshop characteristics that are acceptable to multidisciplinary trainees. Further testing is warranted to determine effectiveness and accurately identify workshop components leading to change.

摘要

目的

为卫生和社会护理专业人员提供基于证据的沟通技巧培训对于改善重症患者及其家属的护理至关重要。我们旨在评估为期半天的多学科互动研讨会“艰难对话”的自我报告影响,并获取反馈以指导未来的发展与评估。

方法

利用2015年2月至2016年8月期间在研讨会前后立即收集的问卷数据进行服务评估,内容涉及参与者的自我评估信心、知识和技能。定性的自由文本评论提供了关于研讨会的反馈,并进行了内容分析。

结果

在886名研讨会参与者中,655人完成了基线问卷,714人完成了研讨会后问卷;550人是配对组。参与者包括合格或实习全科医生(34%)、社区护士和护理协调员(32%)、社会护理专业人员(7%)、养老院工作人员(6%)、高级实践/专科护士(5%)、护理人员(5%)和专职医疗专业人员(3%)。所有组在平均自我评估信心(2.46,95%置信区间2.41至2.51;至3.20,95%置信区间3.17至3.24;P<0.001)、知识(2.22,95%置信区间2.17至2.27;至3.18,95%置信区间3.14至3.22;P<0.001)和技能(2.37,95%置信区间2.32至2.42;至3.09,95%置信区间3.05至3.12;P<0.001)方面均有显著提高。定性研究结果表明,参与者重视角色扮演、沟通框架首字母缩写词以及讨论机会。他们称赞研讨会主持人的技能、安全的氛围和跨专业学习。建议的改进包括更有准备的角色扮演以及对所教授主题的更广泛覆盖。

结论

“艰难对话”研讨会与参与者自我评估的信心、知识和技能的提高相关。我们的研究结果确定了多学科受训人员可接受的研讨会特征。有必要进行进一步测试以确定有效性并准确识别导致变化的研讨会组成部分。

相似文献

1
'Difficult Conversations': evaluation of multiprofessional training.
BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2018 Mar;8(1):45-48. doi: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2017-001447. Epub 2017 Nov 8.
5
An interprofessional approach to teaching communication skills.
J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2011 Fall;31(4):265-7. doi: 10.1002/chp.20139.
8
A Systematic Review of End-of-Life Care Communication Skills Training for Generalist Palliative Care Providers: Research Quality and Reporting Guidance.
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2017 Sep;54(3):417-425. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2017.04.008. Epub 2017 Aug 4.
10
Assessment of an interprofessional online curriculum for palliative care communication training.
J Palliat Med. 2014 Apr;17(4):400-6. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2013.0270. Epub 2014 Jan 8.

引用本文的文献

4
Barriers and facilitators for cardiopulmonary resuscitation discussions with people with heart failure.
PLoS One. 2024 Dec 31;19(12):e0314631. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0314631. eCollection 2024.
6
Parkinson's disease and Covid-19: Is there an impact of ethnicity and the need for palliative care.
Int Rev Neurobiol. 2022;165:229-249. doi: 10.1016/bs.irn.2022.03.004. Epub 2022 Apr 27.
7
General practitioners' role in improving health care in care homes: a realist review.
Fam Pract. 2023 Feb 9;40(1):119-127. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmac071.
8
Nurses' experiences of supporting patients requesting voluntary assisted dying: A qualitative meta-synthesis.
J Adv Nurs. 2022 Oct;78(10):3101-3115. doi: 10.1111/jan.15324. Epub 2022 Jun 24.

本文引用的文献

1
A Systematic Review of End-of-Life Care Communication Skills Training for Generalist Palliative Care Providers: Research Quality and Reporting Guidance.
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2017 Sep;54(3):417-425. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2017.04.008. Epub 2017 Aug 4.
3
Improving communication with palliative care cancer patients at home - A pilot study of SAGE & THYME communication skills model.
Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2015 Oct;19(5):465-72. doi: 10.1016/j.ejon.2015.02.005. Epub 2015 Mar 14.
6
Generalist plus specialist palliative care--creating a more sustainable model.
N Engl J Med. 2013 Mar 28;368(13):1173-5. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1215620. Epub 2013 Mar 6.
9
Is there a cost to poor communication in cancer care?: a critical review of the literature.
Psychooncology. 2005 Oct;14(10):875-84; discussion 885-6. doi: 10.1002/pon.947.
10
Communication about the ending of anticancer treatment and transition to palliative care.
Ann Oncol. 2004 Oct;15(10):1551-7. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdh386.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验