Northwick Park and Central Middlesex Hospitals, London North West University Healthcare NHS Trust, Harrow, United Kingdom.
King's College London, Cicely Saunders Institute, Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing, Midwifery & Palliative Care, London, United Kingdom.
PLoS One. 2024 Mar 18;19(3):e0299933. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0299933. eCollection 2024.
Patient involvement in goals of care decision-making has shown to enhance satisfaction, affective-cognitive outcomes, allocative efficiency, and reduce unwarranted clinical variation. However, the involvement of patients in goals of care planning within hospitals remains limited, particularly where mismatches in shared understanding between doctors and patients are present.
To identify and critically examine factors influencing goals of care conversations between doctors and patients during acute hospital illness.
Realist systematic review following the RAMESES standards. A protocol has been published in PROSPERO (CRD42021297410). The review utilised realist synthesis methodology, including a scoping literature search to generate initial theories, theory refinement through stakeholder consultation, and a systematic literature search to support program theory.
Data were collected from Medline, PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, PsychINFO, Scopus databases (1946 to 14 July 2023), citation tracking, and Google Scholar. Open-Grey was utilized to identify relevant grey literature. Studies were selected based on relevance and rigor to support theory development.
Our analysis included 52 papers, supporting seven context-mechanism-output (CMO) hypotheses. Findings suggest that shared doctor-patient understanding relies on doctors being confident, competent, and personable to foster trusting relationships with patients. Low doctor confidence often leads to avoidance of discussions. Moreover, information provided to patients is often inconsistent, biased, procedure-focused, and lacks personalisation. Acute illness, medical jargon, poor health literacy, and high emotional states further hinder patient understanding.
Goals of care conversations in hospitals are nuanced and often suboptimal. To improve patient experiences and outcome of care interventions should be personalised and tailored to individual needs, emphasizing effective communication and trusting relationships among patients, families, doctors, and healthcare teams. Inclusion of caregivers and acknowledgment at the service level are crucial for achieving desired outcomes. Implications for policy, research, and clinical practice, including further training and skills development for doctors, are discussed.
患者参与医疗照护目标决策已被证明可以提高满意度、情感认知结果、分配效率,并减少不必要的临床差异。然而,在医院中,患者参与医疗照护计划的程度仍然有限,特别是在医生和患者之间存在共享理解的不匹配的情况下。
确定并批判性地考察影响急性住院期间医生与患者之间医疗照护目标对话的因素。
遵循 RAMESES 标准的真实主义系统综述。该综述的方案已在 PROSPERO(CRD42021297410)上发表。该综述利用了真实主义综合方法,包括进行范围广泛的文献检索以生成初始理论、通过利益攸关方咨询进行理论细化,以及进行系统文献检索以支持计划理论。
数据来自 Medline、PubMed、Embase、CINAHL、PsychINFO、Scopus 数据库(1946 年至 2023 年 7 月 14 日)、引文追踪和 Google Scholar。Open-Grey 用于确定相关灰色文献。根据相关性和严谨性选择研究,以支持理论发展。
我们的分析包括 52 篇论文,支持七个上下文-机制-结果(CMO)假设。研究结果表明,医生和患者之间的共同理解依赖于医生的自信、能力和亲和力,以与患者建立信任关系。医生信心不足往往导致避免讨论。此外,向患者提供的信息往往不一致、有偏见、侧重于程序,且缺乏个性化。急性疾病、医学术语、健康素养低和情绪状态高进一步阻碍了患者的理解。
医院中的医疗照护目标对话是复杂的,往往不尽如人意。为了改善患者体验和医疗干预的结果,应根据个人需求进行个性化和定制,强调患者、家属、医生和医疗团队之间的有效沟通和信任关系。包括照顾者,并在服务层面上得到认可,对于实现预期结果至关重要。讨论了对政策、研究和临床实践的影响,包括对医生的进一步培训和技能发展。