Millward Gareth
Faculty of Public Health and Policy, Centre for History in Public Health, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Contemp Br Hist. 2017 Jul 3;31(3):384-406. doi: 10.1080/13619462.2016.1247701.
In 1956, the British Ministry of Health instituted a vaccination programme against poliomyelitis, but run into myriad supply and administrative issues. When Coventry experienced an epidemic in 1957, it came to symbolise these problems. Throughout, it was claimed that the government lacked 'common sense'. This article explores how and why 'common sense' was used as a rhetorical weapon in the debates over policy at the local and national level. While those claiming 'common sense' were often at odds with medical and administrative authorities, the arguments were often informed by deeply held beliefs about vaccination and disease.
1956年,英国卫生部启动了一项针对小儿麻痹症的疫苗接种计划,但遇到了无数的供应和管理问题。1957年考文垂爆发疫情时,这些问题集中凸显出来。自始至终,人们都声称政府缺乏“常识”。本文探讨了在地方和国家层面关于政策的辩论中,“常识”是如何以及为何被用作一种修辞武器的。虽然那些声称“常识”的人往往与医学和行政当局意见相左,但这些论点往往是基于对疫苗接种和疾病的根深蒂固的信念。