• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

测试设置和人群之间的测试性能差异。

Test Performance Variation Between Settings and Populations.

机构信息

American Academy of Health Care Providers in the Addictive Disorders, 10 Ellet Street, Boston, MA, 02122-2940, USA.

出版信息

J Gambl Stud. 2018 Dec;34(4):1085-1108. doi: 10.1007/s10899-017-9728-9.

DOI:10.1007/s10899-017-9728-9
PMID:29119356
Abstract

The present paper is the third in a series on the evaluation of new tests designed to detect the disordered gambler. The present paper has two objectives. First, the observed variation in test performance between settings and populations is described in general terms and an explanation of the observed variation is presented in terms of what is referred to as spectrum effects. Second the expected variation in test performance between settings and populations is illustrated with several examples and the implications emphasized for the purpose of test evaluation.

摘要

本文是关于评估旨在检测病态赌徒的新测试的系列论文的第三篇。本文有两个目标。首先,以一般术语描述了不同环境和人群中测试性能的观察到的变化,并根据所谓的“谱效应”来解释观察到的变化。其次,通过几个示例说明了不同环境和人群中测试性能的预期变化,并强调了这些变化对测试评估目的的影响。

相似文献

1
Test Performance Variation Between Settings and Populations.测试设置和人群之间的测试性能差异。
J Gambl Stud. 2018 Dec;34(4):1085-1108. doi: 10.1007/s10899-017-9728-9.
2
Comparative Test Evaluation: Methods and Challenges.比较测试评估:方法与挑战。
J Gambl Stud. 2018 Dec;34(4):1109-1138. doi: 10.1007/s10899-018-9745-3.
3
The validation of screening tests: meet the new screen same as the old screen?筛查试验的验证:新筛与旧筛相同吗?
J Gambl Stud. 2012 Dec;28(4):573-605. doi: 10.1007/s10899-011-9285-6.
4
Setting criterion thresholds for estimating prevalence: what is being validated?设定估计患病率的标准阈值:正在验证什么?
J Gambl Stud. 2014 Sep;30(3):577-607. doi: 10.1007/s10899-013-9380-y.
5
[The Hungarian version of the Problem Gambling Severity Index (PGSI-HU)].[问题赌博严重程度指数的匈牙利语版本(PGSI-HU)]
Psychiatr Hung. 2013;28(3):274-80.
6
Reflections on accuracy.关于准确性的思考。
J Gambl Stud. 2006 Dec;22(4):393-404. doi: 10.1007/s10899-006-9025-5.
7
The problem of false-positive diagnosis in melanoma screening: the impact of dermoscopy.黑色素瘤筛查中的假阳性诊断问题:皮肤镜检查的影响。
Melanoma Res. 2003 Apr;13(2):179-82. doi: 10.1097/00008390-200304000-00011.
8
Testing the construct validity of the gambling functional assessment-revised.测试赌博功能评估修订版的结构效度。
Behav Modif. 2011 Nov;35(6):553-69. doi: 10.1177/0145445511416635. Epub 2011 Sep 1.
9
A preliminary adaptation of the Problem Gambling Severity Index for Indigenous Australians: internal reliability and construct validity.澳大利亚原住民问题赌博严重程度指数的初步改编:内部信度与结构效度。
Aust N Z J Public Health. 2014 Aug;38(4):349-54. doi: 10.1111/1753-6405.12254.
10
[Reliability and validity of the modified Japanese version of the South Oaks Gambling Screen (SOGS)].[改良版日语版南橡树赌博筛查量表(SOGS)的信效度]
Shinrigaku Kenkyu. 2007 Feb;77(6):547-52. doi: 10.4992/jjpsy.77.547.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparative Test Evaluation: Methods and Challenges.比较测试评估:方法与挑战。
J Gambl Stud. 2018 Dec;34(4):1109-1138. doi: 10.1007/s10899-018-9745-3.

本文引用的文献

1
Development and validation of the Gambling Pathways Questionnaire (GPQ).赌博路径问卷(GPQ)的开发与验证
Psychol Addict Behav. 2017 Feb;31(1):95-109. doi: 10.1037/adb0000234. Epub 2016 Dec 12.
2
Problem gambling worldwide: An update and systematic review of empirical research (2000-2015).全球问题赌博:实证研究的更新与系统综述(2000 - 2015年)
J Behav Addict. 2016 Dec;5(4):592-613. doi: 10.1556/2006.5.2016.073. Epub 2016 Oct 27.
3
Harmonizing Screening for Gambling Problems in Epidemiological Surveys - Development of the Rapid Screener for Problem Gambling (RSPG).
协调流行病学调查中赌博问题的筛查——问题赌博快速筛查工具(RSPG)的开发。
J Behav Addict. 2016 Jun;5(2):239-50. doi: 10.1556/2006.5.2016.030. Epub 2016 Jun 27.
4
The spectrum effect in tests for risk prediction, screening, and diagnosis.风险预测、筛查和诊断测试中的谱效应。
BMJ. 2016 Jun 22;353:i3139. doi: 10.1136/bmj.i3139.
5
Reliability of Instruments Measuring At-Risk and Problem Gambling Among Young Individuals: A Systematic Review Covering Years 2009-2015.测量年轻人中处于风险和问题赌博状态的工具的可靠性:2009 - 2015年的系统评价
J Adolesc Health. 2016 Jun;58(6):600-15. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2016.03.007. Epub 2016 Apr 14.
6
Which Diagnostic Criteria are Most Useful in Discriminating Between Social Gamblers and Individuals with Gambling Problems? An Examination of DSM-IV and DSM-5 Criteria.哪些诊断标准在区分社交赌徒和有赌博问题的个体方面最有用?对《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第四版和第五版标准的考察。
J Gambl Stud. 2016 Sep;32(3):957-68. doi: 10.1007/s10899-015-9591-5.
7
Evaluation of brief screens for gambling disorder in the substance use treatment setting.物质使用治疗环境中赌博障碍简短筛查工具的评估
Am J Addict. 2015 Aug;24(5):460-6. doi: 10.1111/ajad.12241. Epub 2015 May 12.
8
Gamblers seeking treatment: Who does and who doesn't?寻求治疗的赌徒:谁会去,谁不会去?
J Behav Addict. 2014 Sep;3(3):189-98. doi: 10.1556/JBA.3.2014.3.7. Epub 2014 Sep 27.
9
Effects of Affective and Anxiety Disorders on Outcome in Problem Gamblers Attending Routine Cognitive-Behavioural Treatment in South Australia.情感障碍和焦虑症对南澳大利亚接受常规认知行为治疗的问题赌徒治疗结果的影响。
J Gambl Stud. 2015 Sep;31(3):1069-83. doi: 10.1007/s10899-014-9465-2.
10
DSM-5 gambling disorder: prevalence and characteristics in a substance use disorder sample.《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第五版赌博障碍:物质使用障碍样本中的患病率及特征
Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2014 Feb;22(1):50-6. doi: 10.1037/a0034518.