Fauconnier Alan
Federal Agency for Medicines and Health Products, Place Victor Horta 40/40, 1060, Brussels, Belgium.
Culture in vivo ASBL, Rue du Progrès 4, boîte 7, 1400, Nivelles, Belgium.
Methods Mol Biol. 2018;1693:253-268. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-7395-8_19.
Following decades in the wilderness, bacteriophage therapy is now appearing as a credible antimicrobial strategy. However, this reemerging therapy does not rekindle without raising sensitive regulatory concerns. Indeed, whereas the European regulatory framework has been basically implemented to tackle ready-to-use pharmaceuticals produced on a large scale, bacteriophage therapy relies on a dynamic approach requiring a regulation on personalized medicine, nonexistent at present. Because of this, no guideline are currently available for addressing the scientific and regulatory issues specifically related to phage therapy medicinal products (PTMP).Pending to the implementation of an appropriate regulatory framework and to the development of ensuing guidelines, several avenues which might lead to PTMP regulatory compliance are explored here. Insights might come from the multi-strain dossier approach set up for particular animal vaccines, from the homologous group concept developed for the allergen products or from the licensing process for veterinary autogenous vaccines. Depending on national legislations, customized preparations prescribed as magistral formulas or to be used on a named-patient basis are possible regulatory approaches to be considered. However, these schemes are not optimal and should thus be regarded as transitional.
在经历了数十年的冷落之后,噬菌体疗法如今正作为一种可靠的抗菌策略崭露头角。然而,这种再度兴起的疗法在引发敏感的监管问题的情况下才得以重新兴起。事实上,欧洲监管框架基本上是为应对大规模生产的即用型药品而实施的,而噬菌体疗法依赖于一种动态方法,需要对个性化医疗进行监管,而目前这方面尚不存在相关规定。因此,目前尚无针对解决与噬菌体疗法药品(PTMP)具体相关的科学和监管问题的指南。在适当的监管框架实施以及后续指南制定之前,本文探讨了几种可能导致PTMP符合监管要求的途径。见解可能来自为特定动物疫苗设立的多菌株档案方法、为过敏原产品开发的同源组概念或兽医自体疫苗的许可程序。根据国家立法,作为配方制剂规定或按指定患者使用的定制制剂是可能要考虑的监管方法。然而,这些方案并非最优,因此应被视为过渡性的。