Suppr超能文献

鸽子分类学习中的特征预测性与选择性注意

Feature predictiveness and selective attention in pigeons' categorization learning.

作者信息

Castro Leyre, Wasserman Edward A

机构信息

Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, The University of Iowa.

出版信息

J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn. 2017 Jul;43(3):231-242. doi: 10.1037/xan0000146.

Abstract

Prior categorization studies have shown that pigeons reliably track features that are perfect predictors of category membership (Castro & Wasserman, 2014, 2016a). One might further ask whether pigeons would also track features that are relevant, but imperfect predictors of category membership. In our present project, pigeons had to categorize multiple exemplars from 2 different artificial categories, in which the exemplars were composed of 4 different features that were associated with 1 of 2 different report responses. Each exemplar contained 1 feature that perfectly predicted category membership; 1 feature that imperfectly predicted category membership; and, 2 irrelevant features that did not predict category membership. We monitored pigeons' choice accuracy as well as the location of their pecks to each of the 4 exemplar features to determine to which attributes the birds attended. As categorization accuracy rose, pecks to the perfect predictor of each category rose as well. Pigeons also showed evidence of attending more to the imperfect predictor than to the irrelevant features, but to a lesser degree. Overall, our results provide evidence of selective attention in pigeons' categorization behavior. (PsycINFO Database Record

摘要

先前的分类研究表明,鸽子能够可靠地追踪那些作为类别成员完美预测指标的特征(卡斯特罗和瓦瑟曼,2014年,2016年a)。人们可能会进一步问,鸽子是否也会追踪那些相关但并非完美的类别成员预测指标的特征。在我们目前的项目中,鸽子必须对来自2个不同人工类别的多个范例进行分类,其中范例由4种不同特征组成,这些特征与2种不同报告反应中的1种相关联。每个范例包含1个能完美预测类别成员的特征;1个能不完美预测类别成员的特征;以及2个与类别成员无关的特征。我们监测了鸽子的选择准确性以及它们对4个范例特征中每个特征的啄击位置,以确定鸽子关注哪些属性。随着分类准确性的提高,对每个类别的完美预测指标的啄击次数也增加了。鸽子还表现出比对无关特征更多地关注不完美预测指标的迹象,但程度较小。总体而言,我们的结果为鸽子分类行为中的选择性注意提供了证据。(《心理学文摘数据库记录》

相似文献

1
Feature predictiveness and selective attention in pigeons' categorization learning.
J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn. 2017 Jul;43(3):231-242. doi: 10.1037/xan0000146.
2
Pigeons' tracking of relevant attributes in categorization learning.
J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn. 2014 Apr;40(2):195-211. doi: 10.1037/xan0000022.
3
The role of category density in pigeons' tracking of relevant information.
Learn Behav. 2019 Sep;47(3):234-244. doi: 10.3758/s13420-019-00372-x.
4
Attentional shifts in categorization learning: Perseveration but not learned irrelevance.
Behav Processes. 2016 Feb;123:63-73. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2015.11.001. Epub 2015 Nov 5.
7
Conditional same-different discrimination by pigeons: acquisition and generalization to novel and few-item displays.
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2010 Jan;36(1):23-38. doi: 10.1037/a0016326.
8
Scene gist categorization by pigeons.
J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn. 2014 Apr;40(2):162-77. doi: 10.1037/xan0000014.
10
Natural categorization through multiple feature learning in pigeons.
Q J Exp Psychol B. 2000 Nov;53(4):341-57. doi: 10.1080/713932733.

引用本文的文献

1
Enhanced attention in rats following blast-induced traumatic brain injury.
Heliyon. 2024 Feb 10;10(4):e25661. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e25661. eCollection 2024 Feb 29.
2
Visual categories and concepts in the avian brain.
Anim Cogn. 2023 Jan;26(1):153-173. doi: 10.1007/s10071-022-01711-8. Epub 2022 Nov 10.
3
Assessing Attention in Category Learning by Animals.
Curr Dir Psychol Sci. 2021 Dec;30(6):495-502. doi: 10.1177/09637214211045686. Epub 2021 Oct 20.
5
Focusing and shifting attention in pigeon category learning.
J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn. 2021 Jul;47(3):371-383. doi: 10.1037/xan0000302.
6
Taking pigeons to heart: Birds proficiently diagnose human cardiac disease.
Learn Behav. 2020 Mar;48(1):9-21. doi: 10.3758/s13420-020-00410-z.
7
Pigeon category learning: Revisiting the Shepard, Hovland, and Jenkins (1961) tasks.
J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn. 2019 Apr;45(2):174-184. doi: 10.1037/xan0000198. Epub 2019 Mar 14.
8
The role of category density in pigeons' tracking of relevant information.
Learn Behav. 2019 Sep;47(3):234-244. doi: 10.3758/s13420-019-00372-x.
9
The neuroscience of perceptual categorization in pigeons: A mechanistic hypothesis.
Learn Behav. 2018 Sep;46(3):229-241. doi: 10.3758/s13420-018-0321-6.

本文引用的文献

1
Attention and associative learning in humans: An integrative review.
Psychol Bull. 2016 Oct;142(10):1111-1140. doi: 10.1037/bul0000064. Epub 2016 Aug 8.
2
Learning in rich networks involves both positive and negative associations.
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2016 Aug;145(8):1062-74. doi: 10.1037/xge0000187. Epub 2016 Jun 23.
3
Attentional shifts in categorization learning: Perseveration but not learned irrelevance.
Behav Processes. 2016 Feb;123:63-73. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2015.11.001. Epub 2015 Nov 5.
4
Executive control and task switching in pigeons.
Cognition. 2016 Jan;146:121-35. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2015.07.014. Epub 2015 Sep 24.
5
Neural basis of visual selective attention.
Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci. 2011 Jul;2(4):392-407. doi: 10.1002/wcs.117. Epub 2010 Oct 4.
6
Combination or Differentiation? Two theories of processing order in classification.
Cogn Psychol. 2015 Aug;80:1-33. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2015.04.002. Epub 2015 Jun 8.
7
Feedback can be superior to observational training for both rule-based and information-integration category structures.
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2015;68(6):1203-22. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2014.978875. Epub 2015 Jan 9.
8
Pigeons' tracking of relevant attributes in categorization learning.
J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn. 2014 Apr;40(2):195-211. doi: 10.1037/xan0000022.
10
Implicit and explicit categorization: a tale of four species.
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2012 Nov;36(10):2355-69. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2012.09.003. Epub 2012 Sep 11.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验