Castro Leyre, Wasserman Edward A
Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, The University of Iowa.
J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn. 2017 Jul;43(3):231-242. doi: 10.1037/xan0000146.
Prior categorization studies have shown that pigeons reliably track features that are perfect predictors of category membership (Castro & Wasserman, 2014, 2016a). One might further ask whether pigeons would also track features that are relevant, but imperfect predictors of category membership. In our present project, pigeons had to categorize multiple exemplars from 2 different artificial categories, in which the exemplars were composed of 4 different features that were associated with 1 of 2 different report responses. Each exemplar contained 1 feature that perfectly predicted category membership; 1 feature that imperfectly predicted category membership; and, 2 irrelevant features that did not predict category membership. We monitored pigeons' choice accuracy as well as the location of their pecks to each of the 4 exemplar features to determine to which attributes the birds attended. As categorization accuracy rose, pecks to the perfect predictor of each category rose as well. Pigeons also showed evidence of attending more to the imperfect predictor than to the irrelevant features, but to a lesser degree. Overall, our results provide evidence of selective attention in pigeons' categorization behavior. (PsycINFO Database Record
先前的分类研究表明,鸽子能够可靠地追踪那些作为类别成员完美预测指标的特征(卡斯特罗和瓦瑟曼,2014年,2016年a)。人们可能会进一步问,鸽子是否也会追踪那些相关但并非完美的类别成员预测指标的特征。在我们目前的项目中,鸽子必须对来自2个不同人工类别的多个范例进行分类,其中范例由4种不同特征组成,这些特征与2种不同报告反应中的1种相关联。每个范例包含1个能完美预测类别成员的特征;1个能不完美预测类别成员的特征;以及2个与类别成员无关的特征。我们监测了鸽子的选择准确性以及它们对4个范例特征中每个特征的啄击位置,以确定鸽子关注哪些属性。随着分类准确性的提高,对每个类别的完美预测指标的啄击次数也增加了。鸽子还表现出比对无关特征更多地关注不完美预测指标的迹象,但程度较小。总体而言,我们的结果为鸽子分类行为中的选择性注意提供了证据。(《心理学文摘数据库记录》