Licata Anna, Puccia Fania, Lombardo Vania, Serruto Antonietta, Minissale Maria G, Morreale Ilaria, Giannitrapani Lydia, Soresi Maurizio, Montalto Giuseppe, Almasio Piero L
Internal Medicine and Hepatology Unit, DIBIMIS.
Clinical Pharmacology Unit, Sicilian Regional Center of Pharmacovigilance, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Policlinico P. Giaccone, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy.
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018 Feb;30(2):226-232. doi: 10.1097/MEG.0000000000001030.
AIM/OBJECTIVE/BACKGROUND: Direct-acting oral anticoagulant drugs are marketed worldwide for the primary and secondary prevention and treatment of thromboembolic disorders. Rivaroxaban, an oral, direct factor Xa inhibitor, is one of the most used. Rivaroxaban-induced hepatotoxicity is unusual, although a number of adverse reports have recently been reported. Here, we report two new cases of rivaroxaban-induced hepatitis.
A systematic search of case reports on the MEDLINE database encompassing the years 2008-2016 was carried out.Additional references were obtained following a manual search of the retrieved papers. We report two new cases of adverse events occurred in patients treated with rivaroxaban (20 mg/die) to prevent systemic embolism, who presented with hepatocellular liver injury with onset at 8 weeks after initiation of the drug intake.
Twenty-six cases were retrieved from MEDLINE (57.7% female, 42.3% male). Using the Roussel Uclaf Causality Assessment Method (RUCAM) scale, liver injury was classified as hepatocellular (42.3%), cholestatic (26.9%), or mixed (15.4%). Older age (≥65 years) was present as a risk factor in 57.7%. The time lapse between initiation of treatment and onset of hepatic injury ranged from 2 to 180 days (median: 15 days). Our two new patients were diagnosed with drug-induced liver injury (hepatocellular pattern) using the 'consensus criteria', for drug-induced liver injury. Their RUCAM scores were calculated and assessed as highly probable and probable, respectively. A clinical recovery after rivaroxaban withdrawal was observed.
Direct-acting oral anticoagulants have been commonly prescribed, even if safety issues regarding the use of these drugs are still an ongoing concern, especially in patients experiencing chronic liver disease. Dedicated postauthorization safety studies should be undertaken to better define rivaroxaban-induced drug-induced liver injury.
目的/目标/背景:直接作用口服抗凝药物在全球范围内用于血栓栓塞性疾病的一级和二级预防及治疗。利伐沙班是一种口服的直接Xa因子抑制剂,是最常用的药物之一。尽管最近有一些不良反应报告,但利伐沙班引起的肝毒性并不常见。在此,我们报告两例利伐沙班所致肝炎的新病例。
对2008 - 2016年MEDLINE数据库中的病例报告进行系统检索。通过对检索到的论文进行人工检索获取其他参考文献。我们报告两例使用利伐沙班(20毫克/天)预防系统性栓塞的患者发生的不良事件,这些患者在开始服药8周后出现肝细胞性肝损伤。
从MEDLINE检索到26例病例(女性占57.7%,男性占42.3%)。使用鲁塞尔·优克福因果关系评估法(RUCAM)量表,肝损伤分为肝细胞性(42.3%)、胆汁淤积性(26.9%)或混合型(15.4%)。57.7%的病例存在年龄较大(≥65岁)这一危险因素。治疗开始至肝损伤出现的时间间隔为2至180天(中位数:15天)。我们的两名新患者根据药物性肝损伤的“共识标准”被诊断为药物性肝损伤(肝细胞型)。计算了他们的RUCAM评分,分别评估为高度可能和很可能。观察到停用利伐沙班后临床症状恢复。
直接作用口服抗凝剂已被广泛处方,尽管这些药物使用的安全性问题仍然是一个持续关注的问题,尤其是在患有慢性肝病的患者中。应开展专门的上市后安全性研究,以更好地界定利伐沙班所致药物性肝损伤。