Suppr超能文献

在不同组织、国家和价值体系中,面部宽高比因社会等级而异。

Facial width-to-height ratio differs by social rank across organizations, countries, and value systems.

作者信息

Hahn Tim, Winter Nils R, Anderl Christine, Notebaert Karolien, Wuttke Alina Marie, Clément Celina Chantal, Windmann Sabine

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Cognitive Psychology II, Johann-Wolfgang-Goethe University, Frankfurt, Germany.

Research Center of Marketing and Consumer Science, Katholieke Universiteit, Leuven, Belgium.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2017 Nov 9;12(11):e0187957. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0187957. eCollection 2017.

Abstract

Facial Width-to-Height Ratio (fWHR) has been linked with dominant and aggressive behavior in human males. We show here that on portrait photographs published online, chief executive officers (CEOs) of companies listed in the Dow Jones stock market index and the Deutscher Aktienindex have a higher-than-normal fWHR, which also correlates positively with their company's donations to charitable causes and environmental awareness. Furthermore, we show that leaders of the world's most influential non-governmental organizations and even the leaders of the Roman Catholic Church, the popes, have higher fWHR compared to controls on public portraits, suggesting that the relationship between displayed fWHR and leadership is not limited to profit-seeking organizations. The data speak against the simplistic view that wider-faced men achieve higher social status through antisocial tendencies and overt aggression, or the mere signaling of such dispositions. Instead they suggest that high fWHR is linked with high social rank in a more subtle fashion in both competitive as well as prosocially oriented settings.

摘要

面部宽高比(fWHR)与人类男性的主导和攻击性行为有关。我们在此表明,在网上发布的肖像照片中,道琼斯股票市场指数和德国股票指数所列出公司的首席执行官(CEO)具有高于正常水平的fWHR,这也与他们公司对慈善事业的捐赠以及环境意识呈正相关。此外,我们表明,世界上最有影响力的非政府组织的领导人,甚至罗马天主教会的领导人教皇,在公开肖像中与对照组相比具有更高的fWHR,这表明所展示的fWHR与领导力之间的关系并不局限于追求利润的组织。这些数据反驳了一种简单化的观点,即脸更宽的男性通过反社会倾向和公然的攻击性,或者仅仅是这种倾向的信号来获得更高的社会地位。相反,它们表明在竞争以及亲社会导向的环境中,高fWHR以一种更微妙的方式与高社会地位相关联。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7345/5679545/d210ebb44525/pone.0187957.g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Facial width-to-height ratio differs by social rank across organizations, countries, and value systems.
PLoS One. 2017 Nov 9;12(11):e0187957. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0187957. eCollection 2017.
2
Predicting Firm Success From the Facial Appearance of Chief Executive Officers of Non-Profit Organizations.
Perception. 2016 Oct;45(10):1137-50. doi: 10.1177/0301006616652043. Epub 2016 Jun 20.
3
Social status moderates the relationship between facial structure and aggression.
Psychol Sci. 2013 Nov 1;24(11):2329-34. doi: 10.1177/0956797613493294. Epub 2013 Sep 25.
4
Facial Width-to-Height Ratio Does Not Predict Self-Reported Behavioral Tendencies.
Psychol Sci. 2017 Nov;28(11):1675-1682. doi: 10.1177/0956797617716929. Epub 2017 Oct 4.
7
The Facial Width-to-Height Ratio Predicts Sex Drive, Sociosexuality, and Intended Infidelity.
Arch Sex Behav. 2018 Jul;47(5):1375-1385. doi: 10.1007/s10508-017-1070-x. Epub 2017 Sep 19.
8
Men's facial width-to-height ratio predicts aggression: a meta-analysis.
PLoS One. 2015 Apr 7;10(4):e0122637. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0122637. eCollection 2015.
9
The influence of income and testosterone on the validity of facial width-to-height ratio as a biomarker for dominance.
PLoS One. 2018 Nov 9;13(11):e0207333. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0207333. eCollection 2018.
10
Facial Width-To-Height Ratio (fWHR) Is Not Associated with Adolescent Testosterone Levels.
PLoS One. 2016 Apr 14;11(4):e0153083. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0153083. eCollection 2016.

引用本文的文献

2
Was facial width-to-height ratio subject to sexual selection pressures? A life course approach.
PLoS One. 2021 Mar 12;16(3):e0240284. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0240284. eCollection 2021.
3
The importance of first impression judgements in interspecies interactions.
Sci Rep. 2020 Feb 10;10(1):2218. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-58867-x.
4
Morphometric traits predict educational attainment independently of socioeconomic background.
BMC Public Health. 2019 Dec 18;19(1):1696. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-8072-7.
5
Facial width-to-height ratio is associated with agonistic and affiliative dominance in bonobos (Pan paniscus).
Biol Lett. 2019 Aug 30;15(8):20190232. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2019.0232. Epub 2019 Aug 28.

本文引用的文献

1
The facial width-to-height ratio determines interpersonal distance preferences in the observer.
Aggress Behav. 2017 Sep;43(5):460-470. doi: 10.1002/ab.21704. Epub 2017 Mar 6.
2
The role of facial appearance on CEO selection after firm misconduct.
J Appl Psychol. 2017 Apr;102(4):617-635. doi: 10.1037/apl0000172. Epub 2016 Dec 19.
3
The Facial Appearance of CEOs: Faces Signal Selection but Not Performance.
PLoS One. 2016 Jul 27;11(7):e0159950. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0159950. eCollection 2016.
4
Facial Width-To-Height Ratio (fWHR) Is Not Associated with Adolescent Testosterone Levels.
PLoS One. 2016 Apr 14;11(4):e0153083. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0153083. eCollection 2016.
5
Focal Length Affects Depicted Shape and Perception of Facial Images.
PLoS One. 2016 Feb 19;11(2):e0149313. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0149313. eCollection 2016.
7
Men's facial width-to-height ratio predicts aggression: a meta-analysis.
PLoS One. 2015 Apr 7;10(4):e0122637. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0122637. eCollection 2015.
9
The face-time continuum: lifespan changes in facial width-to-height ratio impact aging-associated perceptions.
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2014 Dec;40(12):1624-36. doi: 10.1177/0146167214552791. Epub 2014 Oct 2.
10
The facial width-to-height ratio shares stronger links with judgments of aggression than with judgments of trustworthiness.
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2014 Aug;40(4):1526-41. doi: 10.1037/a0036732. Epub 2014 May 12.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验