Department of Psychiatry, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
J Affect Disord. 2011 Oct;133(3):600-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2011.04.033. Epub 2011 Jun 12.
The relationship between anxiety and impulsivity is controversial and not well explored. In a previous study we compared impulsivity, measured by different rating tools, in patients with anxiety disorders vs. healthy controls. In the same sample we now explore the influence of comorbid soft bipolar spectrum disorders on the relationship between anxiety disorders and impulsivity.
A sample including 47 subjects with anxiety disorder(s) and 45 control subjects matched for demographic, educational and work characteristics underwent a diagnostic evaluation by the Mini Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI); a symptomatological evaluation by the Bech-Rafaelsen Depression and Mania Scale (BRDMS), the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI), the Hypomania Check List (HCL-32) and the Clinical Global Impression (CGI); a temperamental and personological evaluation by the Questionnaire for the Affective and Anxious Temperament Evaluation of Memphis, Pisa, Paris and San Diego-Modified (TEMPS-M), the Separation Anxiety Symptoms Inventory (SASI), the Interpersonal Sensitivity Symptoms Inventory (ISSI); and, finally, a psychometric and a neuro-cognitive evaluation of impulsivity by the Barratt Impulsiveness Scale (BIS) and the Immediate and Delayed Memory Task (IMT/DMT). The initial sample of patients with anxiety disorders was then subdivided into two subgroups depending on the presence of comorbid cyclothymia (Cyclo+, n=26 and Cyclo-, n=21). For the diagnosis of cyclothymic disorder, we used both the DSM-IV-TR criteria and also a modified threshold for hypomania with a duration of 2 days. We compared symptomatological, temperamental, personological and impulsivity measures in Cyclo+, Cyclo- and controls.
The comparison between Cyclo+, Cyclo- and controls showed that Cyclo+ are the most impulsive subjects in all the investigated measures and are characterized by greatest symptomatological impairment, highest scores in temperamental scales, and highest levels of interpersonal sensitivity and separation anxiety. Cyclo- subjects resulted to be more impulsive compared to controls concerning the retrospective trait measures, but not in the neuro-cognitive test.
Correlational cross-sectional study.
In our patients with anxiety disorders, without lifetime comorbidity with major mood episodes, trait and state impulsivity resulted to be greater than in controls. In particular impulsivity was highest in patients with both anxiety disorders and cyclothymia. In anxious-cyclothymic patients also separation anxiety and interpersonal sensitivity were more severe than in anxious patients without cyclothymia and controls. Our findings suggest that impulsivity, rather than being directly related to the presence of the anxiety disorder, could be associated with comorbidity with cyclothymia.
焦虑与冲动之间的关系存在争议,尚未得到充分探讨。在之前的一项研究中,我们比较了焦虑障碍患者和健康对照组在不同评定工具下的冲动性。在同一样本中,我们现在探讨了共患软双相谱障碍对焦虑障碍与冲动之间关系的影响。
包括 47 名焦虑障碍患者和 45 名匹配人口统计学、教育和工作特征的对照组在内的样本接受了 Mini 神经精神病学访谈 (MINI) 的诊断评估;贝克-拉斐尔森抑郁和躁狂量表 (BRDMS)、状态-特质焦虑量表 (STAI)、轻躁狂检查表 (HCL-32) 和临床总体印象 (CGI) 的症状评估;情感和焦虑气质评估问卷的特质和人格评估,孟菲斯、比萨、巴黎和圣地亚哥-改良版 (TEMPS-M)、分离焦虑症状量表 (SASI)、人际敏感症状量表 (ISSI);最后,巴雷特冲动量表 (BIS) 和即时和延迟记忆任务 (IMT/DMT) 对冲动进行了心理测量和神经认知评估。然后,根据是否存在共患环性心境障碍 (Cyclo+,n=26 和 Cyclo-,n=21),将最初的焦虑障碍患者样本进一步分为两个亚组。对于环性心境障碍的诊断,我们同时使用了 DSM-IV-TR 标准和持续 2 天的躁狂改良阈值。我们比较了 Cyclo+、Cyclo-和对照组的症状、气质、人格和冲动性测量。
Cyclo+、Cyclo-和对照组之间的比较表明,Cyclo+在所有研究的测量中是最冲动的受试者,并且表现出最大的症状损害、在气质量表中得分最高,以及最高的人际敏感性和分离焦虑水平。与对照组相比,Cyclo-受试者在回溯性特质测量中表现出更强的冲动性,但在神经认知测试中并非如此。
相关性横断面研究。
在我们没有终生共病重性情绪发作的焦虑障碍患者中,特质和状态冲动性大于对照组。特别是,在同时患有焦虑障碍和环性心境障碍的患者中,冲动性最高。在焦虑-环性心境障碍患者中,与无环性心境障碍的焦虑患者和对照组相比,分离焦虑和人际敏感性也更为严重。我们的研究结果表明,冲动性与其说是与焦虑障碍的存在直接相关,不如说是与环性心境障碍共病相关。