Betini Raquel S D, Hirdes John P, Lero Donna S, Cadell Susan, Poss Jeff, Heckman George
University of Waterloo, 200 University Avenue West, Waterloo, ON, N2L 3G1, Canada.
University of Guelph, 50 Stone Rd E, Guelph, ON, N1G 2W1, Canada.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Nov 9;17(1):709. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2671-8.
The unpaid care provided by informal caregivers allows care recipients to live longer in their homes, which often results in fewer unnecessary long term care home (LTCH) admissions. Although the relationship between care recipient's health characteristics and institutionalization is well known, the influence of caregiver distress and caregiving coresidence and relationship on this outcome is less clear. This study examines the association of care recipient care needs, caregiver distress and caregiving coresidence and relationship with care recipient long term care home admission.
A total of 94,957 resident assessment instruments-home care (RAI-HC), completed between April 01st 2013 and April 01st, 2014 as part of a clinical practice by 14 Local Health Integration Networks (LHINs) in Ontario, Canada, were linked to LTCH admissions within 1 year after completion of the first RAI-HC assessment. Cox models were used to examine whether care recipient health care needs, caregiver distress and caregiving characteristics such as coresidence and relationship were associated with LTCH admission. Age, marital status and gender of the care recipient were included as covariates in the model.
Care recipient health care needs and age were the strongest predictors of LTCH admission followed by caregiver distress and caregiving coresidence and relationship. Care recipient marital status was not significant in the survival model. Interestingly, care recipients who were cared for by a coresiding adult child caregiver were less likely to be admitted to a LTCH than care recipients cared for by a spouse caregiver coresiding or not with care recipient. Hazard rates (HR) of admission for care recipients cared for by caregivers coresiding and with other type of relationship with care recipient were not significantly different than HR of care recipients cared for by coresiding child caregivers.
These results emphasize the influence of caregiver distress in LTCH admission and highlight the impact of caregiving relationship and coresidence on this outcome. Policy and decision makers should consider these findings when developing and evaluating interventions aiming to avoid LTCH admissions. Moreover, caregiving coresidence and relationship should be explored in future studies with similar aims, as this information has been neglected in past research.
非正式照料者提供的无偿照料使受照料者能够更长时间地居家生活,这通常会减少不必要的长期护理院(LTCH)入院情况。虽然受照料者的健康特征与入住护理机构之间的关系已为人熟知,但照料者的痛苦以及照料者与受照料者共同居住情况和关系对这一结果的影响尚不清楚。本研究考察受照料者的护理需求、照料者的痛苦以及照料者与受照料者共同居住情况和关系与受照料者长期护理院入院之间的关联。
作为加拿大安大略省14个地方卫生整合网络(LHINs)临床实践的一部分,在2013年4月1日至2014年4月1日期间共完成了94,957份居家护理居民评估工具(RAI-HC),并将其与首次RAI-HC评估完成后1年内的LTCH入院情况相联系。使用Cox模型来检验受照料者的医疗保健需求、照料者的痛苦以及诸如共同居住情况和关系等照料特征是否与LTCH入院有关。受照料者的年龄、婚姻状况和性别作为协变量纳入模型。
受照料者的医疗保健需求和年龄是LTCH入院最强的预测因素,其次是照料者的痛苦以及照料者与受照料者共同居住情况和关系。受照料者的婚姻状况在生存模型中不显著。有趣的是,与由配偶照料者(无论是否与受照料者共同居住)照料相比,由共同居住的成年子女照料者照料的受照料者入住LTCH的可能性更小。由与受照料者共同居住且与受照料者有其他关系类型的照料者照料的受照料者的入院风险率(HR)与由共同居住的子女照料者照料的受照料者的HR没有显著差异。
这些结果强调了照料者痛苦对LTCH入院的影响,并突出了照料关系和共同居住情况对这一结果的影响。政策制定者和决策者在制定和评估旨在避免LTCH入院的干预措施时应考虑这些发现。此外,在未来具有类似目标的研究中应探讨照料者与受照料者共同居住情况和关系,因为这一信息在过去的研究中被忽视了。