Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Leuven University Hospital, Leuven, Belgium.
BMJ Open. 2017 Nov 8;7(11):e016208. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016208.
To assess the prevalence of major obstetric haemorrhage managed with peripartum hysterectomy and/or interventional radiology (IR) in Belgium. To describe women characteristics, the circumstances in which the interventions took place, the management of the obstetric haemorrhage, the outcome and additional morbidity of these women.
Nationwide population-based prospective cohort study.
Emergency obstetric care. Participation of 97% of maternities covering 98.6% of deliveries in Belgium.
All women who underwent peripartum hysterectomy and/or IR procedures in Belgium between January 2012 and December 2013.
We obtained data on 166 women who underwent peripartum hysterectomy (n=84) and/or IR procedures (n=102), corresponding to 1 in 3030 women undergoing a peripartum hysterectomy and another 1 in 3030 women being managed by IR, thereby preserving the uterus. Seventeen women underwent hysterectomy following IR and three women needed further IR despite hysterectomy. Abnormal placentation and/or uterine atony were the reported causes of haemorrhage in 83.7%. Abnormally invasive placenta was not detected antenatally in 34% of cases. The interventions were planned in 15 women. Three women were transferred antenatally and 17 women postnatally to a hospital with emergency IR service. Urgent peripartum hysterectomy was averted in 72% of the women who were transferred, with no significant difference in need for transfusion. IR procedures were able to stop the bleeding in 87.8% of the attempts. Disseminated intravascular coagulation secondary to major haemorrhage was reported in 32 women (19%).
The prevalence in Belgium of major obstetric haemorrhage requiring peripartum hysterectomy and/or IR is estimated at 6.6 (95% CI 5.7 to 7.7) per 10 000 deliveries. Increased clinician awareness of the risk factors of abnormal placentation could further improve the management and outcome of major obstetric haemorrhage. A case-by-case in-depth analysis is necessary to reveal whether the hysterectomies and arterial embolisations performed in this study were appropriate or preventable.
评估比利时因产科大出血而行子宫切除术和/或介入放射学(IR)治疗的流行率。描述妇女的特征、干预发生的情况、产科出血的处理、这些妇女的结局和额外的发病率。
全国性基于人群的前瞻性队列研究。
紧急产科护理。比利时 97%的产妇参与,涵盖了 98.6%的分娩。
2012 年 1 月至 2013 年 12 月期间在比利时行子宫切除术和/或 IR 手术的所有妇女。
我们获得了 166 名妇女的数据,她们行子宫切除术(n=84)和/或 IR 手术(n=102),每 3030 名行子宫切除术的妇女中就有 1 名,每 3030 名行子宫保留的 IR 手术的妇女中也有 1 名。17 名妇女在 IR 后行子宫切除术,3 名妇女尽管行子宫切除术仍需要进一步的 IR。出血的原因报告为异常胎盘和/或子宫收缩乏力,占 83.7%。34%的病例未在产前检测到异常侵袭性胎盘。15 名妇女计划进行干预。3 名妇女在产前转至具有紧急 IR 服务的医院,17 名妇女在产后转至该医院。72%的转院妇女避免了紧急围产期子宫切除术,且输血需求无显著差异。87.8%的尝试中,IR 手术能够止血。32 名妇女(19%)报告了弥散性血管内凝血继发于大出血。
比利时因产科大出血需要行子宫切除术和/或 IR 的流行率估计为每 10000 例分娩 6.6(95%CI 5.7 至 7.7)例。增加临床医生对异常胎盘风险因素的认识可以进一步改善产科大出血的处理和结局。有必要对每一个病例进行深入分析,以揭示本研究中进行的子宫切除术和动脉栓塞术是否合理或可预防。