Kim Hyung Tae, Kim Sae Young, Byun Gyung Jo, Shin Byung Chul, Lee Jin Young, Choi Eun Joo, Choi Jong Bum, Hong Ji Hee, Choi Seung Won, Kim Yeon Dong
Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Presbyterian Hospital, Jeonju, Korea.
Committee on Ultrasound in Pain Medicine, Korean Pain Society, Seoul, Korea.
Korean J Pain. 2017 Oct;30(4):287-295. doi: 10.3344/kjp.2017.30.4.287. Epub 2017 Sep 29.
Recently, the use of ultrasound (US) techniques in regional anesthesia and pain medicine has increased significantly. However, the current extent of training in the use of US-guided pain management procedures in Korea remains unknown. The purpose of the present study was to assess the current state of US training provided during Korean Pain Society (KPS) pain fellowship programs through the comparative analysis between training hospitals.
We conducted an anonymous survey of 51 pain physicians who had completed KPS fellowships in 2017. Items pertained to current US practices and education, as well as the types of techniques and amount of experience with US-guided pain management procedures. Responses were compared based on the tier of the training hospital.
Among the 51 respondents, 14 received training at first- and second-tier hospitals (Group A), while 37 received training at third-tier hospitals (Group B). The mean total duration of pain training during the 1-year fellowship was 7.4 months in Group A and 8.4 months in Group B. Our analysis revealed that 36% and 40% of respondents in Groups A and B received dedicated US training, respectively. Most respondents underwent US training in patient-care settings under the supervision of attending physicians. Cervical root, stellate ganglion, piriformis, and lumbar plexus blocks were more commonly performed by Group B than by Group A ( < 0.05).
Instruction regarding US-guided pain management interventions varied among fellowship training hospitals, highlighting the need for the development of educational standards that mandate a minimum number of US-guided nerve blocks or injections during fellowships in interventional pain management.
最近,超声(US)技术在区域麻醉和疼痛医学中的应用显著增加。然而,韩国目前在超声引导下疼痛管理程序使用方面的培训程度仍不清楚。本研究的目的是通过培训医院之间的比较分析,评估韩国疼痛学会(KPS)疼痛 fellowship 项目期间提供的超声培训的现状。
我们对 2017 年完成 KPS fellowship 的 51 名疼痛科医生进行了匿名调查。调查项目涉及当前的超声实践和教育,以及超声引导下疼痛管理程序的技术类型和经验量。根据培训医院的层级对回复进行比较。
在 51 名受访者中,14 人在一级和二级医院接受培训(A 组),37 人在三级医院接受培训(B 组)。A 组 1 年 fellowship 期间疼痛培训的平均总时长为 7.4 个月,B 组为 8.4 个月。我们的分析显示,A 组和 B 组分别有 36%和 40%的受访者接受了专门的超声培训。大多数受访者在主治医生的监督下在患者护理环境中接受超声培训。B 组比 A 组更常进行颈神经根、星状神经节、梨状肌和腰丛阻滞(<0.05)。
各 fellowship 培训医院之间关于超声引导下疼痛管理干预的指导各不相同,这突出表明需要制定教育标准,规定在介入性疼痛管理 fellowship 期间进行超声引导下神经阻滞或注射的最低次数。