• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
US Preventive Services Task Force prostate-specific antigen screening guidelines result in higher Gleason score diagnoses.美国预防服务工作组前列腺特异性抗原筛查指南导致更高的格里森评分诊断。
Investig Clin Urol. 2017 Nov;58(6):423-428. doi: 10.4111/icu.2017.58.6.423. Epub 2017 Nov 2.
2
Metastatic prostate cancer incidence in Australia after amendment to prostate-specific antigen screening guidelines.澳大利亚前列腺特异性抗原筛查指南修订后转移性前列腺癌的发病率
ANZ J Surg. 2018 Jul-Aug;88(7-8):E589-E593. doi: 10.1111/ans.14275. Epub 2017 Nov 30.
3
Impact of the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendations against prostate specific antigen screening on prostate biopsy and cancer detection rates.美国预防服务工作组关于反对前列腺特异性抗原筛查的建议对前列腺活检及癌症检出率的影响。
J Urol. 2015 May;193(5):1519-24. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2014.11.096. Epub 2014 Dec 3.
4
Changes in the outcome of prostate biopsies after preventive task force recommendation against prostate-specific antigen screening.在预防工作组建议反对前列腺特异性抗原筛查后,前列腺活检结果的变化。
BMC Urol. 2018 Aug 20;18(1):69. doi: 10.1186/s12894-018-0384-x.
5
PSA screening, prostate biopsy, and treatment of prostate cancer in the years surrounding the USPSTF recommendation against prostate cancer screening.美国预防服务工作组建议反对前列腺癌筛查后,对前列腺特异性抗原筛查、前列腺活检和前列腺癌治疗的相关情况。
Cancer. 2018 Jul 1;124(13):2733-2739. doi: 10.1002/cncr.31337. Epub 2018 May 21.
6
Impact of the 2012 United States Preventive Services Task Force statement on prostate-specific antigen screening: analysis of urologic and primary care practices.2012年美国预防服务工作组关于前列腺特异性抗原筛查声明的影响:泌尿外科及初级保健实践分析
Urology. 2015 Jan;85(1):85-9. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2014.07.072. Epub 2014 Nov 11.
7
Change in prostate cancer presentation coinciding with USPSTF screening recommendations at a community-based urology practice.在一家社区泌尿外科诊所,前列腺癌表现的变化与美国预防服务工作组(USPSTF)的筛查建议相符。
Urol Oncol. 2017 Nov;35(11):663.e1-663.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2017.06.059. Epub 2017 Jul 21.
8
Prostate Needle Biopsy Outcomes in the Era of the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation against Prostate Specific Antigen Based Screening.美国预防服务工作组建议反对基于前列腺特异性抗原的筛查时代的前列腺穿刺活检结果
J Urol. 2016 Jan;195(1):66-73. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2015.07.099. Epub 2015 Aug 6.
9
Impact of Prostate-specific Antigen (PSA) Screening Trials and Revised PSA Screening Guidelines on Rates of Prostate Biopsy and Postbiopsy Complications.前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)筛查试验和修订的 PSA 筛查指南对前列腺活检率和活检后并发症的影响。
Eur Urol. 2017 Jan;71(1):55-65. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.03.015. Epub 2016 Mar 16.
10
Changes observed in prostate biopsy practices in an inner city hospital with a high risk patient population following the 2012 uspstf psa screening recommendations.在 2012 年 USPSTF PSA 筛查建议发布后,观察到一家市中心医院高危患者人群中前列腺活检实践的变化。
Int Braz J Urol. 2018 Jul-Aug;44(4):697-703. doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2017.0348.

引用本文的文献

1
Perspectives and Misconceptions of an Online Adult Male Cohort Regarding Prostate Cancer Screening.在线成年男性群体对前列腺癌筛查的观点和误解。
Curr Oncol. 2024 Oct 20;31(10):6395-6405. doi: 10.3390/curroncol31100475.
2
Cancer Associated Macrophage-like Cells Are Prognostic for Highly Aggressive Prostate Cancer in Both the Non-Metastatic and Metastatic Settings.癌症相关巨噬细胞样细胞对非转移性和转移性高侵袭性前列腺癌均具有预后意义。
Cancers (Basel). 2023 Jul 22;15(14):3725. doi: 10.3390/cancers15143725.
3
Increasing aggressive prostate cancer.侵袭性前列腺癌增多。
Can J Urol. 2022 Dec;29(6):11384-11390.
4
Assessment of factors associated with PSA level in prostate cancer cases and controls from three geographical regions.评估来自三个地理区域的前列腺癌病例和对照个体中与 PSA 水平相关的因素。
Sci Rep. 2022 Jan 7;12(1):55. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-04116-8.
5
Prostate Cancer Screening in Brazil: a single center experience in the public health system.巴西的前列腺癌筛查:公共卫生系统中的单中心经验。
Int Braz J Urol. 2021 May-Jun;47(3):558-565. doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2020.0392.
6
Impact on prostate cancer clinical presentation after non-screening policies at a tertiary-care medical center- a retrospective study.非筛查政策对三级医疗中心前列腺癌临床表现的影响-一项回顾性研究。
BMC Urol. 2021 Feb 8;21(1):20. doi: 10.1186/s12894-021-00784-w.
7
A Trend Toward Aggressive Prostate Cancer.侵袭性前列腺癌的一种趋势。
Rev Urol. 2020;22(3):102-109.
8
Impact of PI-RADS Category 3 lesions on the diagnostic accuracy of MRI for detecting prostate cancer and the prevalence of prostate cancer within each PI-RADS category: A systematic review and meta-analysis.PI-RADS 类别 3 病变对 MRI 检测前列腺癌的诊断准确性的影响以及每个 PI-RADS 类别中的前列腺癌患病率:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Br J Radiol. 2021 Feb 1;94(1118):20191050. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20191050. Epub 2020 Oct 22.
9
Prostate Cancer Incidence and Aggressiveness in Appalachia versus Non-Appalachia Populations in Pennsylvania by Urban-Rural Regions, 2004-2014.宾夕法尼亚州城乡地区 2004-2014 年阿巴拉契亚地区与非阿巴拉契亚地区前列腺癌发病和侵袭性比较。
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2020 Jul;29(7):1365-1373. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-19-1232. Epub 2020 Apr 10.
10
Time Trends for Prostate Cancer Incidence from 2003 to 2013 in South Korea: An Age-Period-Cohort Analysis.韩国 2003 至 2013 年前列腺癌发病率的时间趋势:一项年龄-时期-队列分析。
Cancer Res Treat. 2020 Jan;52(1):301-308. doi: 10.4143/crt.2019.194. Epub 2019 Aug 1.

本文引用的文献

1
Decline in Prostate Cancer Screening by Primary Care Physicians: An Analysis of Trends in the Use of Digital Rectal Examination and Prostate Specific Antigen Testing.初级保健医生中前列腺癌筛查的下降:数字直肠检查和前列腺特异性抗原检测使用趋势分析。
J Urol. 2016 Oct;196(4):1047-52. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2016.03.171. Epub 2016 Apr 6.
2
Economic Analysis of Prostate-Specific Antigen Screening and Selective Treatment Strategies.前列腺特异性抗原筛查和选择性治疗策略的经济分析。
JAMA Oncol. 2016 Jul 1;2(7):890-8. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2015.6275.
3
Impact of Prostate-specific Antigen (PSA) Screening Trials and Revised PSA Screening Guidelines on Rates of Prostate Biopsy and Postbiopsy Complications.前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)筛查试验和修订的 PSA 筛查指南对前列腺活检率和活检后并发症的影响。
Eur Urol. 2017 Jan;71(1):55-65. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.03.015. Epub 2016 Mar 16.
4
mp-MRI Prostate Characterised PIRADS 3 Lesions are Associated with a Low Risk of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer - A Retrospective Review of 92 Biopsied PIRADS 3 Lesions.磁共振成像(mp-MRI)特征性前列腺影像报告和数据系统(PIRADS)3类病变与临床显著前列腺癌的低风险相关——对92例经活检的PIRADS 3类病变的回顾性研究
Curr Urol. 2015 Jul;8(2):96-100. doi: 10.1159/000365697. Epub 2015 Jul 10.
5
Management of localized and advanced prostate cancer in Canada: A lifetime cost and quality-adjusted life-year analysis.加拿大局限性和晚期前列腺癌的管理:终生成本与质量调整生命年分析
Cancer. 2016 Apr 1;122(7):1085-96. doi: 10.1002/cncr.29892. Epub 2016 Feb 1.
6
Prostate Cancer Incidence and PSA Testing Patterns in Relation to USPSTF Screening Recommendations.与 USPSTF 筛查建议相关的前列腺癌发病率和 PSA 检测模式。
JAMA. 2015 Nov 17;314(19):2054-61. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.14905.
7
The Pendulum of Prostate Cancer Screening.前列腺癌筛查的钟摆
JAMA. 2015 Nov 17;314(19):2031-3. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.13775.
8
Impact of the US Preventive Services Task Force Grade D Recommendation: Assessment of Evaluations for Elevated Prostate-specific Antigen and Prostate Biopsies in a Large Urology Group Practice Following Statement Revision.美国预防服务工作组D级推荐的影响:声明修订后在一个大型泌尿外科团体诊所中对前列腺特异性抗原升高及前列腺活检评估的评价
Rev Urol. 2015;17(3):171-7.
9
Prostate Needle Biopsy Outcomes in the Era of the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation against Prostate Specific Antigen Based Screening.美国预防服务工作组建议反对基于前列腺特异性抗原的筛查时代的前列腺穿刺活检结果
J Urol. 2016 Jan;195(1):66-73. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2015.07.099. Epub 2015 Aug 6.
10
Trends in Prostate-specific Antigen Screening, Prostate Biopsies, Urology Visits, and Prostate Cancer Treatments From 2000 to 2012.2000年至2012年前列腺特异性抗原筛查、前列腺活检、泌尿科就诊及前列腺癌治疗的趋势
Urology. 2015 Sep;86(3):498-505. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2015.04.063. Epub 2015 Jun 27.

美国预防服务工作组前列腺特异性抗原筛查指南导致更高的格里森评分诊断。

US Preventive Services Task Force prostate-specific antigen screening guidelines result in higher Gleason score diagnoses.

机构信息

New Jersey Urology, Hackensack University Medical Center, Hackensack, NJ, USA.

Division of Urology, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Bloomfield, NJ, USA.

出版信息

Investig Clin Urol. 2017 Nov;58(6):423-428. doi: 10.4111/icu.2017.58.6.423. Epub 2017 Nov 2.

DOI:10.4111/icu.2017.58.6.423
PMID:29124241
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5671961/
Abstract

PURPOSE

To evaluate the impact that the 2012 US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening guidelines have had on the diagnosis of prostate cancer, we compared the incidence and distribution of new cases diagnosed in 2011-before the USPSTF PSA screening recommendations versus 2014 at which time the guidelines were widely adopted.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We identified all prostate biopsies performed by a large urology group practice utilizing a centralized pathology lab. We examined total biopsies performed, percentage of positive biopsies, and for those with positive biopsies examined for differences in patient age, PSA, and Gleason score.

RESULTS

A total of 4,178 biopsies were identified - 2,513 in 2011 and 1,665 in 2014. The percentage of positive biopsies was 27% in 2011 versus 34% in 2014 (p<0.0001). Among patients with positive biopsies, we found statistically significant differences between the 2 cohorts in the median ages and Gleason scores. Patients were about 1 year younger in 2014 compared to 2011 (t-test; p=0.043). High Gleason scores (8-10) were diagnosed in 19% of the 2014 positive biopsies versus 9% in the 2011 positive biopsies (chi square; p<0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

After the widespread implementation of the 2011 USPTF PSA screening guidelines, 34% fewer biopsies were performed with a 29% increase in positive biopsy rates. We found a significantly higher incidence of high grade disease in 2014 compared with 2011. The percentage of patients with positive biopsies having Gleason scores 8-10 more than doubled in 2014. The higher incidence of these more aggressive cancers must be part of the discussion regarding PSA screening.

摘要

目的

为了评估 2012 年美国预防服务工作组(USPSTF)前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)筛查指南对前列腺癌诊断的影响,我们比较了 2011 年(在 USPSTF PSA 筛查建议之前)和 2014 年(当时指南得到广泛采用)新诊断病例的发病率和分布情况。

材料和方法

我们确定了一家大型泌尿科实践利用集中病理实验室进行的所有前列腺活检。我们检查了总活检次数、阳性活检的百分比,并对那些有阳性活检的患者,检查了患者年龄、PSA 和 Gleason 评分的差异。

结果

共确定了 4178 例活检,其中 2011 年为 2513 例,2014 年为 1665 例。2011 年阳性活检的百分比为 27%,而 2014 年为 34%(p<0.0001)。在有阳性活检的患者中,我们发现两个队列在中位数年龄和 Gleason 评分方面存在统计学上的显著差异。2014 年的患者比 2011 年轻约 1 岁(t 检验;p=0.043)。2014 年高 Gleason 评分(8-10)的诊断率为 19%,而 2011 年阳性活检中的诊断率为 9%(卡方检验;p<0.0001)。

结论

在广泛实施 2011 年 USPSTF PSA 筛查指南后,活检次数减少了 34%,而阳性活检率则增加了 29%。我们发现 2014 年与 2011 年相比,高级别疾病的发病率显著升高。2014 年有阳性活检的患者中,Gleason 评分 8-10 的患者比例增加了一倍以上。这些侵袭性更强的癌症的发病率更高,这必须成为 PSA 筛查讨论的一部分。