Patrizi Annalisa, Raone Beatrice, Ravaioli Giulia Maria
Department of Specialized, Diagnostic and Experimental Medicine, Division of Dermatology, University of Bologna, via Massarenti 1, 40138, Bologna, Italy.
Adv Exp Med Biol. 2017;996:319-331. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-56017-5_27.
Atopic Dermatitis (AD), a common skin disease, can occur in patients of all age, gender and ethnicity. It is an inflammatory affection, characterized by chronic and highly debilitating behavior. First-line interventions against AD include environmental measures and topical emollients, corticosteroids or calcineurin inhibitors. When these measures are not sufficient, phototherapy represents an efficient second-line option of treatment; it can be administered on its own, or in the most severe cases combined with systemic medicaments such as corticosteroids.Different types of light therapy, including photochemotherapy, have been tested in the past and in recent years for AD: in particular, ultraviolet A1 (UVA1) and narrow band ultraviolet B (NB-UVB) have been reported in the literature as the most effective resources, respectively for acute and chronic AD. However, to date, no guidelines have been realized concerning the use of phototherapy for AD, as no light form has been defined superior to the others. The most reliable protocols and dosimetry are standardized within the American Academy of Dermatology (AAD) psoriasis guidelines.In adults and children over 12 years (8 years for NB-UVB) phototherapy is recommended with strength B and level of evidence II (excluding home phototherapy, which is recommended with strength C and level of evidence III). It is usually safe and well tolerated; however its short- and long-term adverse effects are the same as those observed when light therapy is performed for other pathologic conditions. Erythema and photodamage are in particular quite frequent; moreover it has not been clarified whether UV radiation may induce neoplastic cellular transformation. For all these reasons, the use of phototherapy must be chosen only after a comprehensive and careful evaluation of the patient's features and compliance, as well as of the limitations of the procedure due to costs and availability.
特应性皮炎(AD)是一种常见的皮肤病,可发生于所有年龄、性别和种族的患者。它是一种炎症性疾病,其特征为具有慢性且严重影响生活的表现。针对AD的一线干预措施包括环境措施和外用润肤剂、皮质类固醇或钙调神经磷酸酶抑制剂。当这些措施不足时,光疗是一种有效的二线治疗选择;它可以单独使用,或在最严重的情况下与皮质类固醇等全身性药物联合使用。
过去和近年来,不同类型的光疗,包括光化学疗法,已针对AD进行了测试:特别是,文献报道紫外线A1(UVA1)和窄谱中波紫外线(NB-UVB)分别是治疗急性和慢性AD最有效的手段。然而,迄今为止,尚未制定关于AD光疗使用的指南,因为尚未确定哪种光形式优于其他光形式。最可靠的方案和剂量测定在美国皮肤科医师学会(AAD)的银屑病指南中是标准化的。
对于成人和12岁以上的儿童(NB-UVB为8岁),推荐使用强度为B且证据级别为II的光疗(家庭光疗除外,其推荐强度为C且证据级别为III)。它通常是安全且耐受性良好的;然而,其短期和长期不良反应与其他病理状况进行光疗时观察到的不良反应相同。尤其是红斑和光损伤相当常见;此外,尚未明确紫外线辐射是否会诱导肿瘤细胞转化。由于所有这些原因,光疗的使用必须仅在对患者的特征和依从性以及由于成本和可用性导致的该程序的局限性进行全面而仔细的评估之后才能选择。