Suppr超能文献

生物安全措施可预防的 24 种传染病的传播途径综述及在六个欧洲国家的猪群中实施这些措施的比较。

Review of transmission routes of 24 infectious diseases preventable by biosecurity measures and comparison of the implementation of these measures in pig herds in six European countries.

机构信息

Veterinary Epidemiology Unit, Department of Reproduction, Obstetrics and Herd Health, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.

Department of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.

出版信息

Transbound Emerg Dis. 2018 Apr;65(2):381-398. doi: 10.1111/tbed.12758. Epub 2017 Nov 9.

Abstract

This study aimed to review the transmission routes of important infectious pig diseases and to translate these into biosecurity measures preventing or reducing the transmission between and within pig herds. Furthermore, it aimed to identify the level of implementation of these measures in different European countries and discuss the observed variations to identify potentials for improvement. First, a literature review was performed to show which direct and indirect transmission routes of 24 infectious pig diseases can be prevented through different biosecurity measures. Second, a quantitative analysis was performed using the Biocheck.UGent™, a risk-based scoring system to evaluate biosecurity in pig herds, to obtain an insight into the implementation of these biosecurity measures. The database contained farm-specific biosecurity data from 574 pig farms in Belgium, Denmark, France, Germany, the Netherlands and Sweden, entered between January 2014 and January 2016. Third, a qualitative analysis based on a review of literature and other relevant information resources was performed for every subcategory of internal and external biosecurity in the Biocheck.UGent™ questionnaire. The quantitative analysis indicated that at the level of internal, external and overall biosecurity, Denmark had a significantly distinct profile with higher external biosecurity scores and less variation than the rest of the countries. This is likely due to a widely used specific pathogen-free (SPF) system with extensive focus on biosecurity since 1971 in Denmark. However, the observed pattern may also be attributed to differences in data collection methods. The qualitative analysis identified differences in applied policies, legislation, disease status, pig farm density, farming culture and habits between countries that can be used for shaping country-specific biosecurity advice to attain improved prevention and control of important pig diseases in European pig farms.

摘要

本研究旨在综述重要传染性猪病的传播途径,并将其转化为防止或减少猪群间和猪场内传播的生物安全措施。此外,还旨在确定这些措施在不同欧洲国家的实施水平,并讨论所观察到的差异,以确定改进的潜力。首先,进行文献综述,以展示 24 种传染性猪病的哪些直接和间接传播途径可以通过不同的生物安全措施来预防。其次,使用基于风险的评分系统 Biocheck.UGent™进行定量分析,以评估猪群的生物安全状况,从而深入了解这些生物安全措施的实施情况。该数据库包含了 2014 年 1 月至 2016 年 1 月期间,来自比利时、丹麦、法国、德国、荷兰和瑞典的 574 个猪场的特定于农场的生物安全数据。第三,对 Biocheck.UGent™问卷中的内部和外部生物安全的每个子类别进行了基于文献综述和其他相关信息资源的定性分析。定量分析表明,在内部、外部和总体生物安全方面,丹麦的特征明显不同,外部生物安全得分较高,且变化幅度小于其他国家。这可能是由于丹麦自 1971 年以来广泛使用特定病原体(SPF)系统,并且非常重视生物安全。然而,观察到的模式也可能归因于数据收集方法的差异。定性分析确定了国家之间在应用政策、立法、疾病状况、猪场密度、养殖文化和习惯方面的差异,可用于制定针对特定国家的生物安全建议,以改善欧洲猪场重要猪病的预防和控制。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验