• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

多运动还是少坐?一项评估两种基于建议的干预措施在肥胖不活跃成年人中可行性的随机试验。

Exercise more or sit less? A randomized trial assessing the feasibility of two advice-based interventions in obese inactive adults.

机构信息

Department of Public Health, Aarhus University, Denmark.

Department of Public Health, Aarhus University, Denmark.

出版信息

J Sci Med Sport. 2018 Jul;21(7):708-713. doi: 10.1016/j.jsams.2017.10.037. Epub 2017 Nov 7.

DOI:10.1016/j.jsams.2017.10.037
PMID:29128417
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The risk of metabolic and cardiovascular disease may be reduced by a healthy pattern of daily physical activity. We investigated the feasibility and preliminary effectiveness of advice-based interventions aiming at either increasing moderate-to-vigorous intensity physical activity (MVPA) or reducing sedentary time (ST) in obese volunteers.

DESIGN

Randomized non-blinded two-armed trial.

METHOD

Inactive, obese adults were randomly assigned to reduce sedentary behavior (SitLess) (n=30) or increase MVPA (ExMore) (n=29) for 4 weeks. Participants wore ActivPAL (AP) and ActiGraph (AG) devices for 7 consecutive days at baseline and during the final week of the intervention period. Cardiometabolic risk factors (waist circumference, BMI, percent body fat, blood pressure, VOmax and blood markers) were measured at baseline and at follow-up. Trial was set in Midtjylland Denmark from 2012 to 2014.

RESULTS

The interventions were completed by 77% (SitLess) and 69% (ExMore) of the participants. The SitLess group reduced sedentary time by 53min/day (95% CI 10; 96; P<0.05) while ExMore increased MVPA by 16min/day (95% CI 5; 27; P<0.05). SitLess and ExMore both improved VOmax by 8% and 11%, respectively (P<0.05). None of the other measured cardiometabolic risk factors changed over the 4 weeks of intervention.

CONCLUSIONS

This trial showed that completion of 4-week, advice-based interventions led to reduced ST or increased MVPA in obese adults. Furthermore, both interventions led to small significant increases in VOmax. Studies of longer duration are needed to determine if these behavioral changes can be maintained, and to quantify possible longterm effects of reduced ST or increased MVPA on cardiometabolic risk factors.

摘要

目的

健康的日常体力活动模式可能降低代谢和心血管疾病的风险。我们研究了旨在增加中等至剧烈强度体力活动(MVPA)或减少久坐时间(ST)的基于建议的干预措施在肥胖志愿者中的可行性和初步效果。

设计

随机非盲双臂试验。

方法

不活跃的肥胖成年人被随机分配到减少久坐行为(SitLess)(n=30)或增加 MVPA(ExMore)(n=29)组,进行 4 周的干预。参与者在基线和干预期的最后一周佩戴 ActivPAL(AP)和 ActiGraph(AG)设备连续 7 天。在基线和随访时测量心血管代谢风险因素(腰围、BMI、体脂百分比、血压、VOmax 和血液标志物)。试验于 2012 年至 2014 年在丹麦米德尔地区进行。

结果

干预完成率分别为 77%(SitLess)和 69%(ExMore)。SitLess 组每天减少静坐时间 53 分钟(95%CI 10;96;P<0.05),而 ExMore 组每天增加 MVPA16 分钟(95%CI 5;27;P<0.05)。SitLess 和 ExMore 分别使 VOmax 提高了 8%和 11%(P<0.05)。在 4 周的干预期间,没有其他测量的心血管代谢风险因素发生变化。

结论

这项试验表明,完成 4 周基于建议的干预措施可导致肥胖成年人减少 ST 或增加 MVPA。此外,两种干预措施都导致 VOmax 显著增加。需要进行更长时间的研究,以确定这些行为变化是否可以维持,并量化减少 ST 或增加 MVPA 对心血管代谢风险因素的可能长期影响。

相似文献

1
Exercise more or sit less? A randomized trial assessing the feasibility of two advice-based interventions in obese inactive adults.多运动还是少坐?一项评估两种基于建议的干预措施在肥胖不活跃成年人中可行性的随机试验。
J Sci Med Sport. 2018 Jul;21(7):708-713. doi: 10.1016/j.jsams.2017.10.037. Epub 2017 Nov 7.
2
Accelerometer-derived sedentary and physical activity time in overweight/obese adults with type 2 diabetes: cross-sectional associations with cardiometabolic biomarkers.超重/肥胖的2型糖尿病成年患者通过加速度计得出的久坐和身体活动时间:与心血管代谢生物标志物的横断面关联
PLoS One. 2015 Mar 16;10(3):e0119140. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0119140. eCollection 2015.
3
The Feasibility of Reducing Sitting Time in Overweight and Obese Older Adults.减少超重和肥胖老年人久坐时间的可行性
Health Educ Behav. 2015 Oct;42(5):669-76. doi: 10.1177/1090198115577378. Epub 2015 Mar 20.
4
5
Sedentary Time, Physical Activity, and Adiposity: Cross-sectional and Longitudinal Associations in CARDIA.久坐时间、身体活动与肥胖:CARDIA 中的横断面和纵向关联。
Am J Prev Med. 2017 Dec;53(6):764-771. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2017.07.009. Epub 2017 Oct 9.
6
Randomized controlled pilot of an intervention to reduce and break-up overweight/obese adults' overall sitting-time.一项旨在减少并打破超重/肥胖成年人总体久坐时间的干预措施的随机对照试验。
Trials. 2015 Nov 2;16:490. doi: 10.1186/s13063-015-1015-4.
7
Effect of a Behavioral Intervention Strategy for Adoption and Maintenance of a Physically Active Lifestyle: The Italian Diabetes and Exercise Study 2 (IDES_2): A Randomized Controlled Trial.行为干预策略对采用和维持积极生活方式的影响:意大利糖尿病与运动研究 2(IDES_2):一项随机对照试验。
Diabetes Care. 2017 Nov;40(11):1444-1452. doi: 10.2337/dc17-0594. Epub 2017 Aug 18.
8
Changes in adiposity, physical activity, cardiometabolic risk factors, diet, physical capacity and well-being in inactive women and men aged 57-74 years with obesity and cardiovascular risk - A 6-month complex lifestyle intervention with 6-month follow-up.肥胖、体力活动、心血管代谢危险因素、饮食、身体能力和幸福感在 57-74 岁肥胖和心血管风险的不活跃女性和男性中的变化 - 一项为期 6 个月的复杂生活方式干预,随访 6 个月。
PLoS One. 2021 Aug 25;16(8):e0256631. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0256631. eCollection 2021.
9
A randomized controlled trial of a wearable technology-based intervention for increasing moderate to vigorous physical activity and reducing sedentary behavior in breast cancer survivors: The ACTIVATE Trial.基于可穿戴技术的干预措施增加乳腺癌幸存者中中等至剧烈体力活动和减少久坐行为的随机对照试验:ACTIVATE 试验。
Cancer. 2019 Aug 15;125(16):2846-2855. doi: 10.1002/cncr.32143. Epub 2019 Apr 23.
10
Reallocating bouted sedentary time to non-bouted sedentary time, light activity and moderate-vigorous physical activity in adults with prediabetes and type 2 diabetes.将2型糖尿病和糖尿病前期成人的有 bouted 久坐时间重新分配为无 bouted 久坐时间、轻度活动和中度至剧烈身体活动。 (注:这里“bouted”可能有误,推测可能是“bout”,但按要求未做修改直接翻译)
PLoS One. 2017 Jul 28;12(7):e0181053. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0181053. eCollection 2017.

引用本文的文献

1
The Effect of Sedentary Behaviour on Cardiorespiratory Fitness: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.久坐行为对心肺适能的影响:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
Sports Med. 2024 Apr;54(4):997-1013. doi: 10.1007/s40279-023-01986-y. Epub 2024 Jan 16.
2
Physiology of sedentary behavior.久坐行为生理学。
Physiol Rev. 2023 Oct 1;103(4):2561-2622. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00022.2022. Epub 2023 Jun 16.
3
Effects of a Dedicated Cardiac Rehabilitation Program for Patients With Obesity on Body Weight, Physical Activity, Sedentary Behavior, and Physical Fitness: The OPTICARE XL Randomized Controlled Trial.
专门的心脏康复计划对肥胖患者体重、身体活动、久坐行为和身体适应性的影响:OPTI-CARE XL 随机对照试验。
Phys Ther. 2023 Sep 1;103(9). doi: 10.1093/ptj/pzad055.
4
Where Does the Time Go? Displacement of Device-Measured Sedentary Time in Effective Sedentary Behaviour Interventions: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.时间都去哪儿了?有效静坐行为干预中设备测量的静坐时间置换:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Sports Med. 2022 Sep;52(9):2177-2207. doi: 10.1007/s40279-022-01682-3. Epub 2022 May 14.
5
Interventions for reducing sedentary behaviour in community-dwelling older adults.减少社区居住老年人久坐行为的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Jun 25;6(6):CD012784. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012784.pub2.
6
Physical Activity and Sedentary Behavior in Cardiac Rehabilitation: Does Body Mass Index Matter?体力活动和心脏康复中的久坐行为:体重指数重要吗?
Phys Ther. 2021 Sep 1;101(9). doi: 10.1093/ptj/pzab142.
7
Interventions outside the workplace for reducing sedentary behaviour in adults under 60 years of age.针对60岁以下成年人减少久坐行为的工作场所以外的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Jul 17;7(7):CD012554. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012554.pub2.
8
The effectiveness and complexity of interventions targeting sedentary behaviour across the lifespan: a systematic review and meta-analysis.针对整个生命周期久坐行为的干预措施的有效性和复杂性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2020 Apr 25;17(1):53. doi: 10.1186/s12966-020-00957-0.
9
Effects of sedentary behaviour interventions on biomarkers of cardiometabolic risk in adults: systematic review with meta-analyses.久坐行为干预对成人心血管代谢风险生物标志物的影响:荟萃分析的系统评价
Br J Sports Med. 2021 Feb;55(3):144-154. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2019-101154. Epub 2020 Apr 8.
10
Effects of a motivational, individual and locally anchored exercise intervention (MILE) on cardiorespiratory fitness: a community-based randomised controlled trial.一项基于社区的随机对照试验:动机性、个体化和本土化运动干预(MILE)对心肺功能适应性的影响。
BMC Public Health. 2019 Feb 28;19(1):239. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-6556-0.