• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Impact of lymph node dissection at the time of radical nephrectomy with tumor thrombectomy on oncological outcomes: Results from the International Renal Cell Carcinoma-Venous Thrombus Consortium (IRCC-VTC).根治性肾切除术联合肿瘤血栓切除术时进行淋巴结清扫对肿瘤学结局的影响:国际肾细胞癌-静脉血栓联盟(IRCC-VTC)的结果
Urol Oncol. 2018 Feb;36(2):79.e11-79.e17. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2017.10.008. Epub 2017 Nov 10.
2
Radical Nephrectomy With or Without Lymph Node Dissection for Nonmetastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Propensity Score-based Analysis.根治性肾切除术联合或不联合淋巴结清扫术治疗非转移性肾细胞癌:基于倾向评分的分析。
Eur Urol. 2017 Apr;71(4):560-567. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.09.019. Epub 2016 Sep 24.
3
The impact of lymph node dissection and positive lymph nodes on cancer-specific mortality in contemporary pT non-metastatic renal cell carcinoma treated with radical nephrectomy.淋巴结清扫和阳性淋巴结对接受根治性肾切除术治疗的当代pT期非转移性肾细胞癌患者癌症特异性死亡率的影响。
BJU Int. 2018 Mar;121(3):383-392. doi: 10.1111/bju.14024. Epub 2017 Oct 12.
4
Prognostic Value of Positive Lymph Nodes in Patients with Renal Cell Carcinoma and Tumor Thrombus Undergoing Nephrectomy and Thrombectomy.肾细胞癌合并肿瘤栓患者行肾切除术和血栓切除术时阳性淋巴结的预后价值。
Urol Int. 2021;105(7-8):657-665. doi: 10.1159/000514057. Epub 2021 Apr 21.
5
Extent of lymphadenectomy does not improve the survival of patients with renal cell carcinoma and nodal metastases: biases associated with the handling of missing data.淋巴结清扫术的范围并不能提高有淋巴结转移的肾细胞癌患者的生存率:与缺失数据处理相关的偏倚。
BJU Int. 2014 Jan;113(1):36-42. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11693.x. Epub 2013 Mar 12.
6
Overall survival in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma and clinical N1 disease undergoing cytoreductive nephrectomy and lymph node dissection.接受减瘤性肾切除术和淋巴结清扫术的转移性肾细胞癌合并临床 N1 期疾病患者的总生存期。
Urol Oncol. 2018 Feb;36(2):79.e19-79.e26. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2017.10.009. Epub 2017 Nov 2.
7
Impact of Microscopic Wall Invasion of the Renal Vein or Inferior Vena Cava on Cancer-specific Survival in Patients with Renal Cell Carcinoma and Tumor Thrombus: A Multi-institutional Analysis from the International Renal Cell Carcinoma-Venous Thrombus Consortium.国际肾细胞癌-静脉血栓形成联盟多机构分析:肾细胞癌合并肿瘤栓子患者肾静脉或下腔静脉镜下壁侵犯对癌症特异性生存的影响。
Eur Urol Focus. 2018 Apr;4(3):435-441. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2017.01.009. Epub 2017 Feb 9.
8
Impact of synchronous metastasis distribution on cancer specific survival in renal cell carcinoma after radical nephrectomy with tumor thrombectomy.根治性肾切除术联合肿瘤血栓切除术治疗后,同步转移分布对肾癌患者的癌症特异性生存的影响。
J Urol. 2015 Feb;193(2):436-42. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2014.07.087. Epub 2014 Jul 22.
9
Does lymph node dissection during nephroureterectomy affect oncological outcomes in upper tract urothelial carcinoma patients without suspicious lymph node metastasis on preoperative imaging studies?在术前影像学检查未发现可疑淋巴结转移的上尿路尿路上皮癌患者中,肾输尿管切除术期间进行淋巴结清扫是否会影响肿瘤学结局?
World J Urol. 2017 Apr;35(4):665-673. doi: 10.1007/s00345-016-1918-z. Epub 2016 Aug 8.
10
Clinical and oncological outcomes in Chinese patients with renal cell carcinoma and venous tumor thrombus extension: single-center experience.中国肾细胞癌伴静脉瘤栓延伸患者的临床和肿瘤学结局:单中心经验
World J Surg Oncol. 2015 Feb 4;13:14. doi: 10.1186/s12957-015-0448-2.

引用本文的文献

1
Potential benefit of lymph node dissection during radical nephrectomy for kidney cancer: A review and critical analysis of current literature.肾癌根治性肾切除术期间淋巴结清扫的潜在益处:当前文献综述与批判性分析
Asian J Urol. 2022 Jul;9(3):215-226. doi: 10.1016/j.ajur.2022.03.007. Epub 2022 May 27.
2
Nomograms for Predicting Overall Survival and Cancer-Specific Survival of Patients With Renal Cell Carcinoma and Venous Tumor Thrombus: A Population-Based Study.预测肾细胞癌合并静脉瘤栓患者总生存和癌症特异性生存的列线图:一项基于人群的研究
Front Surg. 2022 Jun 8;9:929885. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.929885. eCollection 2022.
3
A Predictive Model for Tumor Invasion of the Inferior Vena Cava Wall Using Multimodal Imaging in Patients with Renal Cell Carcinoma and Inferior Vena Cava Tumor Thrombus.基于多模态影像的肾细胞癌合并下腔静脉瘤栓患者下腔静脉壁肿瘤侵犯预测模型。
Biomed Res Int. 2020 Oct 6;2020:9530618. doi: 10.1155/2020/9530618. eCollection 2020.
4
Reassessment of American Joint Committee on Cancer Staging for Stage III Renal Cell Carcinoma With Nodal Involvement: Propensity Score Matched Analyses of a Large Population-Based Study.美国癌症联合委员会对伴有淋巴结转移的Ⅲ期肾细胞癌分期的重新评估:一项基于大人群研究的倾向评分匹配分析
Front Oncol. 2020 Mar 19;10:365. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2020.00365. eCollection 2020.
5
Survival benefit with extended lymphadenectomy for advanced renal malignancy: A population-based analysis.晚期肾恶性肿瘤扩大淋巴结清扫术的生存获益:一项基于人群的分析。
Asian J Urol. 2020 Jan;7(1):29-36. doi: 10.1016/j.ajur.2019.06.004. Epub 2019 Jun 29.
6
Factors affecting lymph node sampling patterns and the impact on survival of lymph node density in patients with Wilms tumor: a Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Result (SEER) database review.影响 Wilms 瘤患者淋巴结采样模式的因素及淋巴结密度对生存的影响:监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)数据库回顾。
J Pediatr Urol. 2020 Feb;16(1):81-88. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2019.10.030. Epub 2019 Nov 6.
7
Is nodal disease burden relevant in patients with renal cell carcinoma and lymph node invasion?淋巴结疾病负担在肾细胞癌伴淋巴结侵犯患者中是否具有相关性?
Ann Transl Med. 2019 Jul;7(Suppl 3):S149. doi: 10.21037/atm.2019.06.31.
8
An analysis of SPECT/CT non-visualization of sentinel lymph nodes in renal tumors.肾肿瘤前哨淋巴结SPECT/CT未显影的分析
EJNMMI Res. 2018 Dec 3;8(1):105. doi: 10.1186/s13550-018-0460-y.

本文引用的文献

1
Renal Cell Carcinoma with Isolated Lymph Node Involvement: Long-term Natural History and Predictors of Oncologic Outcomes Following Surgical Resection.肾细胞癌伴孤立淋巴结受累:手术切除后肿瘤学结局的长期自然史和预测因素。
Eur Urol. 2017 Aug;72(2):300-306. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.12.027. Epub 2017 Jan 13.
2
Management of inferior vena cava tumor thrombus in locally advanced renal cell carcinoma.局部晚期肾细胞癌中 inferior vena cava 肿瘤血栓的管理 。 (注:inferior vena cava 一般译为“下腔静脉” )
Ther Adv Urol. 2015 Aug;7(4):216-29. doi: 10.1177/1756287215576443.
3
Renal cancer.肾癌。
Lancet. 2016 Feb 27;387(10021):894-906. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00046-X. Epub 2015 Aug 25.
4
EAU guidelines on renal cell carcinoma: 2014 update.EAU 指南:肾细胞癌. 2014 年更新版.
Eur Urol. 2015 May;67(5):913-24. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.01.005. Epub 2015 Jan 21.
5
Preoperative predictors of pathological lymph node metastasis in patients with renal cell carcinoma undergoing retroperitoneal lymph node dissection.接受腹膜后淋巴结清扫术的肾癌患者发生病理性淋巴结转移的术前预测因子。
J Urol. 2015 Apr;193(4):1101-7. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2014.10.096. Epub 2014 Oct 25.
6
Impact of synchronous metastasis distribution on cancer specific survival in renal cell carcinoma after radical nephrectomy with tumor thrombectomy.根治性肾切除术联合肿瘤血栓切除术治疗后,同步转移分布对肾癌患者的癌症特异性生存的影响。
J Urol. 2015 Feb;193(2):436-42. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2014.07.087. Epub 2014 Jul 22.
7
Adjuvant therapy for renal cell carcinoma.肾细胞癌的辅助治疗
Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2014 Dec;12(6):408-12. doi: 10.1016/j.clgc.2014.06.012. Epub 2014 Jun 21.
8
The role of lymphadenectomy in the management of renal cell carcinoma.淋巴结清扫术在肾细胞癌治疗中的作用。
World J Urol. 2014 Jun;32(3):643-9. doi: 10.1007/s00345-014-1294-5. Epub 2014 Apr 11.
9
Oncologic outcomes following surgical resection of renal cell carcinoma with inferior vena caval thrombus extending above the hepatic veins: a contemporary multicenter cohort.肾细胞癌合并下腔静脉瘤栓延伸至肝静脉以上患者行外科切除术的肿瘤学结果:一项当代多中心队列研究。
J Urol. 2014 Oct;192(4):1050-6. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2014.03.111. Epub 2014 Apr 2.
10
Lessons learned from the International Renal Cell Carcinoma-Venous Thrombus Consortium (IRCC-VTC).从国际肾细胞癌-静脉血栓形成联盟(IRCC-VTC)中吸取的经验教训。
Curr Urol Rep. 2014 May;15(5):404. doi: 10.1007/s11934-014-0404-7.

根治性肾切除术联合肿瘤血栓切除术时进行淋巴结清扫对肿瘤学结局的影响:国际肾细胞癌-静脉血栓联盟(IRCC-VTC)的结果

Impact of lymph node dissection at the time of radical nephrectomy with tumor thrombectomy on oncological outcomes: Results from the International Renal Cell Carcinoma-Venous Thrombus Consortium (IRCC-VTC).

作者信息

Tilki Derya, Chandrasekar Thenappan, Capitanio Umberto, Ciancio Gaetano, Daneshmand Siamak, Gontero Paolo, Gonzalez Javier, Haferkamp Axel, Hohenfellner Markus, Huang William C, Linares Espinós Estefania, Lorentz Adam, Martinez-Salamanca Juan I, Master Viraj A, McKiernan James M, Montorsi Francesco, Novara Giacomo, Pahernik Sascha, Palou Juan, Pruthi Raj S, Rodriguez-Faba Oscar, Russo Paul, Scherr Douglas S, Shariat Shahrokh F, Spahn Martin, Terrone Carlo, Vera-Donoso Cesar, Zigeuner Richard, Libertino John A, Evans Christopher P

机构信息

Department of Urology, University of California, Davis School of Medicine, Sacramento, CA.

Department of Urology, Hospital San Raffaele, University Vita-Salute, Milano, Italy.

出版信息

Urol Oncol. 2018 Feb;36(2):79.e11-79.e17. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2017.10.008. Epub 2017 Nov 10.

DOI:10.1016/j.urolonc.2017.10.008
PMID:29129353
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8404533/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To study the effect of lymph node dissection (LND) at the time of nephrectomy and tumor thrombectomy on oncological outcomes in patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and tumor thrombus.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The records of 1,978 patients with RCC and tumor thrombus who underwent radical nephrectomy and tumor thrombectomy from 1985 to 2014 at 24 centers were analyzed. None of the patients had distant metastases. Extent and pathologic results of LND were compared with respect to cancer-specific survival (CSS). Multivariable Cox regression models were used to quantify the effect of multiple covariates.

RESULTS

LND was performed in 1,026 patients. In multivariable analysis, the presence of LN metastasis, the number of positive LNs, and LN density were independently associated with cancer-specific mortality (CSM). Clinical node-negative (cN-) disease was documented in 573 patients, 447 of them underwent LND with 43 cN- patients (9.6%) revealing positive LNs at pathology. LN positive cN- patients showed significantly better CSS when compared to LN positive cN+ patients. In multivariable analysis, positive cN status in LN positive patients was a significant predictor of CSM (HR, 2.923; P = 0.015).

CONCLUSIONS

The number of positive nodes harvested during LND and LN density was strong prognostic indicators of CSS, while number of removed LNs did not have a significant effect on CSS. The rate of pN1 patients among clinically node-negative patients was relatively high, and LND in these patients suggested a survival benefit. However, only a randomized trial can determine the absolute benefit of LND in this setting.

摘要

目的

研究肾切除术及肿瘤血栓切除术时进行淋巴结清扫(LND)对肾细胞癌(RCC)合并肿瘤血栓患者肿瘤学结局的影响。

患者与方法

分析了1985年至2014年期间在24个中心接受根治性肾切除术及肿瘤血栓切除术的1978例RCC合并肿瘤血栓患者的记录。所有患者均无远处转移。将LND的范围及病理结果与癌症特异性生存(CSS)进行比较。采用多变量Cox回归模型量化多个协变量的影响。

结果

1026例患者进行了LND。在多变量分析中,淋巴结转移的存在、阳性淋巴结数量及淋巴结密度与癌症特异性死亡率(CSM)独立相关。573例患者记录为临床淋巴结阴性(cN-)疾病,其中447例接受了LND,43例cN-患者(9.6%)病理显示淋巴结阳性。与cN+且淋巴结阳性患者相比,cN-且淋巴结阳性患者的CSS明显更好。在多变量分析中,淋巴结阳性患者的cN阳性状态是CSM的重要预测因素(HR,2.923;P = 0.015)。

结论

LND时获取的阳性淋巴结数量及淋巴结密度是CSS强有力的预后指标,而切除的淋巴结数量对CSS无显著影响。临床淋巴结阴性患者中pN1患者的比例相对较高,对这些患者进行LND显示有生存获益。然而,只有随机试验才能确定在此情况下LND的绝对获益。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/600f/8404533/93b142e6a699/nihms-1676196-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/600f/8404533/375c6da7e05f/nihms-1676196-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/600f/8404533/93b142e6a699/nihms-1676196-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/600f/8404533/375c6da7e05f/nihms-1676196-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/600f/8404533/93b142e6a699/nihms-1676196-f0002.jpg