Han Jianglong, Li Qin, Li Ping, Wang Shijie, Zhang Rui, Qiao Yunfeng, Song Qibin, Fu Zhenming
Cancer Center, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.
Front Oncol. 2020 Mar 19;10:365. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2020.00365. eCollection 2020.
To assess the role of nodal involvement in stage III renal cell carcinoma (RCC) according to the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) 8th staging system. We compared the survival outcomes of RCC patients with pTNM disease and those with pTNM or stage IV (stratified as pTNM and pTNM) disease in a large population-based cohort. A cohort of 3,112 eligible patients with RCC was identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database, registered between January 2004 and December 2015. Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards models were used to evaluate the overall survival (OS), and cancer-specific survival (CSS). The prognostic value of the modified stage for pTNM disease was assessed by nomogram-based analyses. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to adjust for potential baseline confounding. Patients with pTNM disease showed similar survival outcomes (median OS 41.0 vs. 38.0 months, = 0.77; CSS 45.0 vs. 39.0 months, = 0.59) to pTNM patients, whereas the significantly better survival outcome was found for pTNM patients. After PSM, comparable survival rates were observed between pTNM group and pTNM group, which were still significantly worse than the survival of pTNM patients. The modified stage IIIA (pTNM), IIIB (pTNM, pTNM), and IV (pTNM) showed higher predictive accuracy than AJCC stage system in the nomogram-based analyses (concordance index: 0.70 vs. 0.68, < 0.001 for OS; 0.71 vs. 0.69, < 0.001 for CSS). The pTNM RCC might be reclassified as stage IIIB together with pTNM disease for better prediction of prognosis, further examination and validation are warranted.
根据美国癌症联合委员会(AJCC)第8版分期系统评估淋巴结受累在Ⅲ期肾细胞癌(RCC)中的作用。我们在一个基于人群的大型队列中比较了pTNM疾病的RCC患者与pTNM或Ⅳ期(分为pTNM和pTNM)疾病患者的生存结局。从监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)数据库中识别出一组3112例符合条件的RCC患者,这些患者于2004年1月至2015年12月期间注册。采用Kaplan-Meier法和Cox比例风险模型评估总生存期(OS)和癌症特异性生存期(CSS)。通过基于列线图的分析评估pTNM疾病改良分期的预后价值。采用倾向评分匹配(PSM)来调整潜在的基线混杂因素。pTNM疾病患者与pTNM患者的生存结局相似(中位OS 41.0个月对38.0个月,P = 0.77;CSS 45.0个月对39.0个月,P = 0.59),而pTNM患者的生存结局明显更好。PSM后,pTNM组和pTNM组的生存率相当,但仍明显低于pTNM患者的生存率。在基于列线图的分析中,改良的ⅢA期(pTNM)、ⅢB期(pTNM、pTNM)和Ⅳ期(pTNM)比AJCC分期系统具有更高的预测准确性(一致性指数:OS为0.70对0.68,P < 0.001;CSS为0.71对0.69,P < 0.001)。pTNM RCC可能与pTNM疾病一起重新分类为ⅢB期,以便更好地预测预后,有必要进行进一步的检查和验证。