• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美国癌症联合委员会对伴有淋巴结转移的Ⅲ期肾细胞癌分期的重新评估:一项基于大人群研究的倾向评分匹配分析

Reassessment of American Joint Committee on Cancer Staging for Stage III Renal Cell Carcinoma With Nodal Involvement: Propensity Score Matched Analyses of a Large Population-Based Study.

作者信息

Han Jianglong, Li Qin, Li Ping, Wang Shijie, Zhang Rui, Qiao Yunfeng, Song Qibin, Fu Zhenming

机构信息

Cancer Center, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.

出版信息

Front Oncol. 2020 Mar 19;10:365. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2020.00365. eCollection 2020.

DOI:10.3389/fonc.2020.00365
PMID:32266145
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7096477/
Abstract

To assess the role of nodal involvement in stage III renal cell carcinoma (RCC) according to the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) 8th staging system. We compared the survival outcomes of RCC patients with pTNM disease and those with pTNM or stage IV (stratified as pTNM and pTNM) disease in a large population-based cohort. A cohort of 3,112 eligible patients with RCC was identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database, registered between January 2004 and December 2015. Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards models were used to evaluate the overall survival (OS), and cancer-specific survival (CSS). The prognostic value of the modified stage for pTNM disease was assessed by nomogram-based analyses. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to adjust for potential baseline confounding. Patients with pTNM disease showed similar survival outcomes (median OS 41.0 vs. 38.0 months, = 0.77; CSS 45.0 vs. 39.0 months, = 0.59) to pTNM patients, whereas the significantly better survival outcome was found for pTNM patients. After PSM, comparable survival rates were observed between pTNM group and pTNM group, which were still significantly worse than the survival of pTNM patients. The modified stage IIIA (pTNM), IIIB (pTNM, pTNM), and IV (pTNM) showed higher predictive accuracy than AJCC stage system in the nomogram-based analyses (concordance index: 0.70 vs. 0.68, < 0.001 for OS; 0.71 vs. 0.69, < 0.001 for CSS). The pTNM RCC might be reclassified as stage IIIB together with pTNM disease for better prediction of prognosis, further examination and validation are warranted.

摘要

根据美国癌症联合委员会(AJCC)第8版分期系统评估淋巴结受累在Ⅲ期肾细胞癌(RCC)中的作用。我们在一个基于人群的大型队列中比较了pTNM疾病的RCC患者与pTNM或Ⅳ期(分为pTNM和pTNM)疾病患者的生存结局。从监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)数据库中识别出一组3112例符合条件的RCC患者,这些患者于2004年1月至2015年12月期间注册。采用Kaplan-Meier法和Cox比例风险模型评估总生存期(OS)和癌症特异性生存期(CSS)。通过基于列线图的分析评估pTNM疾病改良分期的预后价值。采用倾向评分匹配(PSM)来调整潜在的基线混杂因素。pTNM疾病患者与pTNM患者的生存结局相似(中位OS 41.0个月对38.0个月,P = 0.77;CSS 45.0个月对39.0个月,P = 0.59),而pTNM患者的生存结局明显更好。PSM后,pTNM组和pTNM组的生存率相当,但仍明显低于pTNM患者的生存率。在基于列线图的分析中,改良的ⅢA期(pTNM)、ⅢB期(pTNM、pTNM)和Ⅳ期(pTNM)比AJCC分期系统具有更高的预测准确性(一致性指数:OS为0.70对0.68,P < 0.001;CSS为0.71对0.69,P < 0.001)。pTNM RCC可能与pTNM疾病一起重新分类为ⅢB期,以便更好地预测预后,有必要进行进一步的检查和验证。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/17d0/7096477/81f5a7a43dab/fonc-10-00365-g0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/17d0/7096477/1c0b6b371b0e/fonc-10-00365-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/17d0/7096477/f67ce0912377/fonc-10-00365-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/17d0/7096477/ad3df888400e/fonc-10-00365-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/17d0/7096477/81f5a7a43dab/fonc-10-00365-g0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/17d0/7096477/1c0b6b371b0e/fonc-10-00365-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/17d0/7096477/f67ce0912377/fonc-10-00365-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/17d0/7096477/ad3df888400e/fonc-10-00365-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/17d0/7096477/81f5a7a43dab/fonc-10-00365-g0004.jpg

相似文献

1
Reassessment of American Joint Committee on Cancer Staging for Stage III Renal Cell Carcinoma With Nodal Involvement: Propensity Score Matched Analyses of a Large Population-Based Study.美国癌症联合委员会对伴有淋巴结转移的Ⅲ期肾细胞癌分期的重新评估:一项基于大人群研究的倾向评分匹配分析
Front Oncol. 2020 Mar 19;10:365. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2020.00365. eCollection 2020.
2
Impact of pathologic lymph node-positive renal cell carcinoma on survival in patients without metastasis: Evidence in support of expanding the definition of stage IV kidney cancer.病理淋巴结阳性的肾细胞癌对无转移患者生存的影响:支持扩大 IV 期肾癌定义的证据。
Cancer. 2020 Jul 1;126(13):2991-3001. doi: 10.1002/cncr.32912. Epub 2020 Apr 24.
3
Should Patients with Renal Cell Carcinoma and Pathological Nodal Invasion Be Classified As Having Stage IV Disease?肾细胞癌伴病理性淋巴结转移患者应被归类为Ⅳ期疾病吗?
Ann Surg Oncol. 2023 Aug;30(8):5286-5294. doi: 10.1245/s10434-022-12979-y. Epub 2023 Jun 8.
4
Modification of American Joint Committee on cancer prognostic groups for renal cell carcinoma.美国癌症联合委员会肾癌预后分组的修正。
Cancer Med. 2018 Nov;7(11):5431-5438. doi: 10.1002/cam4.1790. Epub 2018 Oct 10.
5
Prognostic nomograms based on log odds of positive lymph nodes for patients with renal cell carcinoma: A retrospective cohort study.基于淋巴结阳性对数优势比的肾细胞癌患者预后列线图:一项回顾性队列研究。
Int J Surg. 2018 Dec;60:28-40. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2018.10.038. Epub 2018 Oct 30.
6
Modification of the 8th American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system for gallbladder carcinoma to improve prognostic precision.修改第 8 版美国癌症联合委员会胆囊癌分期系统以提高预后准确性。
BMC Cancer. 2020 Nov 23;20(1):1129. doi: 10.1186/s12885-020-07578-7.
7
Developing and validating a prognostic nomogram for ovarian clear cell carcinoma patients: A retrospective comparison of lymph node staging schemes with competing risk analysis.开发并验证卵巢透明细胞癌患者的预后列线图:基于竞争风险分析的淋巴结分期方案回顾性比较
Front Oncol. 2022 Nov 9;12:940601. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.940601. eCollection 2022.
8
Renal cell carcinoma and pathologic nodal disease: Implications for American Joint Committee on Cancer staging.肾细胞癌和病理性淋巴结病:对美国癌症联合委员会分期的影响。
Cancer. 2018 Oct 15;124(20):4023-4031. doi: 10.1002/cncr.31661. Epub 2018 Oct 1.
9
Extent of lymph node dissection improves overall survival in pT3N0 non-metastatic renal cell carcinoma patients treated with radical nephrectomy: a propensity score-based analysis.淋巴结清扫范围改善了根治性肾切除术后 pT3N0 无转移肾细胞癌患者的总生存:基于倾向评分的分析。
World J Urol. 2020 Jun;38(6):1579-1585. doi: 10.1007/s00345-019-02788-6. Epub 2019 May 7.
10
Prognostic Factors and a Nomogram Predicting Overall Survival and Cancer-Specific Survival for Patients with Collecting Duct Renal Cell Carcinoma.预测肾集合管细胞癌患者总生存和癌症特异性生存的预后因素和列线图。
Biomed Res Int. 2021 Nov 11;2021:6736008. doi: 10.1155/2021/6736008. eCollection 2021.

引用本文的文献

1
To Be or "Node" to Be: Nodal Disease and the Role of Lymphadenectomy in the Treatment of Renal Cell Carcinoma.存在还是“结节”存在:淋巴结疾病及淋巴结切除术在肾细胞癌治疗中的作用
Med Res Arch. 2020 May;8(5). doi: 10.18103/mra.v8i5.2091. Epub 2020 May 25.

本文引用的文献

1
Impact of pathologic lymph node-positive renal cell carcinoma on survival in patients without metastasis: Evidence in support of expanding the definition of stage IV kidney cancer.病理淋巴结阳性的肾细胞癌对无转移患者生存的影响:支持扩大 IV 期肾癌定义的证据。
Cancer. 2020 Jul 1;126(13):2991-3001. doi: 10.1002/cncr.32912. Epub 2020 Apr 24.
2
Strengthening the foundation of kidney cancer treatment and research: revising the AJCC staging system.加强肾癌治疗与研究基础:修订美国癌症联合委员会(AJCC)分期系统。
Ann Transl Med. 2019 Mar;7(Suppl 1):S33. doi: 10.21037/atm.2019.02.19.
3
Modification of American Joint Committee on cancer prognostic groups for renal cell carcinoma.
美国癌症联合委员会肾癌预后分组的修正。
Cancer Med. 2018 Nov;7(11):5431-5438. doi: 10.1002/cam4.1790. Epub 2018 Oct 10.
4
Renal cell carcinoma and pathologic nodal disease: Implications for American Joint Committee on Cancer staging.肾细胞癌和病理性淋巴结病:对美国癌症联合委员会分期的影响。
Cancer. 2018 Oct 15;124(20):4023-4031. doi: 10.1002/cncr.31661. Epub 2018 Oct 1.
5
Comparison of prognostic prediction between nomogram based on lymph node ratio and AJCC 8th staging system for patients with resected pancreatic head carcinoma: a SEER analysis.基于淋巴结比率的列线图与美国癌症联合委员会第八版分期系统对切除的胰头癌患者预后预测的比较:一项监测、流行病学和最终结果分析
Cancer Manag Res. 2018 Feb 5;10:227-238. doi: 10.2147/CMAR.S157940. eCollection 2018.
6
Impact of lymph node dissection at the time of radical nephrectomy with tumor thrombectomy on oncological outcomes: Results from the International Renal Cell Carcinoma-Venous Thrombus Consortium (IRCC-VTC).根治性肾切除术联合肿瘤血栓切除术时进行淋巴结清扫对肿瘤学结局的影响:国际肾细胞癌-静脉血栓联盟(IRCC-VTC)的结果
Urol Oncol. 2018 Feb;36(2):79.e11-79.e17. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2017.10.008. Epub 2017 Nov 10.
7
Adjuvant Sunitinib for High-risk Renal Cell Carcinoma After Nephrectomy: Subgroup Analyses and Updated Overall Survival Results.辅助舒尼替尼治疗肾切除术后高危肾细胞癌:亚组分析和更新的总生存结果。
Eur Urol. 2018 Jan;73(1):62-68. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2017.09.008. Epub 2017 Sep 28.
8
Adjuvant Sunitinib in High-Risk Renal-Cell Carcinoma after Nephrectomy.辅助舒尼替尼治疗肾切除术后高危肾细胞癌。
N Engl J Med. 2016 Dec 8;375(23):2246-2254. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1611406. Epub 2016 Oct 9.
9
Life Expectancy and Variation in Treatment for Early Stage Kidney Cancer.预期寿命与早期肾癌治疗的变化。
J Urol. 2016 Sep;196(3):672-7. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2016.03.133. Epub 2016 Mar 21.
10
Patterns of Care in Patients with Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Among a U.S. Payer Population with Commercial or Medicare Advantage Membership.美国具有商业保险或医疗保险优势会员资格的医保人群中转移性肾细胞癌患者的护理模式
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2016 Mar;22(3):219-26. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2016.22.3.219.