Centre for Public Health, Queen's University Belfast, United Kingdom.
Department of Prosthodontics, Gerostomatology and Biomaterials, Center for Oral Health, University Medicine Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany.
J Dent. 2018 Jan;68:66-71. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2017.11.003. Epub 2017 Nov 10.
With a decreased number of teeth, a reduction in chewing function can contribute to changes in food choices and ultimately impact on overall nutritional status. This study compared the impact of two tooth replacement strategies for partially dentate older patients on masticatory performance and nutritional status.
Patients aged 65 years and older were randomly allocated to two different treatment groups. For the RPDP-group (removable partial dental prostheses) each participant was restored to complete dental arches with cobalt-chromium removable prostheses. For the SDA-group (shortened dental arch), participants were restored to 10 occluding pairs of natural and replacement teeth using adhesive bridgework. Masticatory performance was assessed with a colour-mixing ability test. Each patient provided haematological samples that were screened for biochemical markers of nutritional status. Patients were also assessed using the Mini Nutritional Assessment (MNA).
Eighty-nine patients completed the test for masticatory performance and provided blood samples and MNA scores at baseline (BL) and after 12 months (12m). Masticatory performance (p<0.001) and MNA (p<0.05) increased significantly in both groups, but no significant between group differences were noted. A mixed picture was observed for nutrition biomarkers. Mixed-effect linear regression models did not demonstrate that nutritional status could be predicted from masticatory performance.
These results indicate that prosthodontic rehabilitation according to the principles of the SDA is equivalent to RPDPs in terms of restoration of chewing capacity for partially dentate older patients. However, masticatory performance may only have minor associations with nutritional status for this patient group.
Replacing teeth with either RPDPs or SDA provides a prerequisite for efficient chewing. Further research is required to determine the impact of oral rehabilitation coupled with nutritional counselling for this patient population.
随着牙齿数量的减少,咀嚼功能的下降可能会导致食物选择的改变,并最终影响整体营养状况。本研究比较了两种牙列缺损老年患者的牙列修复策略对咀嚼功能和营养状况的影响。
将年龄在 65 岁及以上的患者随机分配到两个不同的治疗组。对于 RPDP 组(可摘局部义齿),每位患者都用钴铬可摘义齿修复至完整的牙弓。对于 SDA 组(短牙弓),使用粘接桥修复 10 对天然牙和修复牙的咬合。通过颜色混合能力测试评估咀嚼功能。每位患者提供血液样本,筛选生化标志物以评估营养状况。患者还接受了 Mini Nutritional Assessment(MNA)评估。
89 例患者完成了咀嚼性能测试,并在基线(BL)和 12 个月(12m)时提供了血液样本和 MNA 评分。两组的咀嚼功能(p<0.001)和 MNA(p<0.05)均显著提高,但组间无显著差异。营养生物标志物的情况较为复杂。混合效应线性回归模型表明,咀嚼功能不能预测营养状况。
这些结果表明,SDA 原则下的修复治疗在恢复部分牙列缺损老年患者的咀嚼能力方面与 RPDP 相当。然而,对于这组患者,咀嚼功能与营养状况之间可能只有很小的关联。
用 RPDP 或 SDA 替换牙齿为有效咀嚼提供了前提。需要进一步研究口腔修复与营养咨询对这一患者群体的影响。