Weisberg Jill, Hubbard Amy Lynn, Emmorey Karen
Laboratory for Language and Cognitive Neuroscience, San Diego State University, 6495 Alvarado Rd., Suite 200, San Diego, CA 92120, USA, 619-594-8069,
Lang Cogn Neurosci. 2017;32(2):158-174. doi: 10.1080/23273798.2016.1245426. Epub 2016 Oct 28.
To examine whether more ecologically valid co-speech gesture stimuli elicit brain responses consistent with those found by studies that relied on scripted stimuli, we presented participants with spontaneously produced, meaningful co-speech gesture during fMRI scanning (n = 28). Speech presented with gesture (versus either presented alone) elicited heightened activity in bilateral posterior superior temporal, premotor, and inferior frontal regions. Within left temporal and premotor, but not inferior frontal regions, we identified small clusters with superadditive responses, suggesting that these discrete regions support both sensory and semantic integration. In contrast, surrounding areas and the inferior frontal gyrus may support either sensory semantic integration. Reduced activation for speech with gesture in language-related regions indicates allocation of fewer neural resources when meaningful gestures accompany speech. Sign language experience did not affect co-speech gesture activation. Overall, our results indicate that scripted stimuli have minimal confounding influences; however, they may miss subtle superadditive effects.
为了检验更符合生态效度的伴随言语手势刺激是否会引发与那些依赖于脚本化刺激的研究中所发现的大脑反应一致的反应,我们在功能磁共振成像扫描期间向参与者呈现自发产生的、有意义的伴随言语手势(n = 28)。与单独呈现言语相比,伴随手势呈现的言语会引发双侧后颞上回、运动前区和额下回区域的活动增强。在左侧颞叶和运动前区而非额下回区域内,我们识别出了具有超相加反应的小簇,这表明这些离散区域支持感觉和语义整合。相比之下,周围区域和额下回可能仅支持感觉或语义整合。与手势一起呈现的言语在语言相关区域的激活减少,这表明当有意义的手势伴随言语时,分配的神经资源较少。手语经验并未影响伴随言语手势的激活。总体而言,我们的结果表明脚本化刺激的混杂影响最小;然而,它们可能会遗漏细微的超相加效应。