Suppr超能文献

以设备为导向的主观结果(DOSO)是否独立于人格?

Is the Device-Oriented Subjective Outcome (DOSO) Independent of Personality?

作者信息

Wu Yu-Hsiang, Dumanch Kelsey, Stangl Elizabeth, Miller Christi, Tremblay Kelly, Bentler Ruth

机构信息

University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA.

University of Washington, Seattle, WA.

出版信息

J Am Acad Audiol. 2017 Nov/Dec;28(10):932-940. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.16142.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Self-report questionnaires are a frequently used method of evaluating hearing aid outcomes. Studies have shown that personality can account for 5-20% of the variance in response to self-report measures. As a result, these influences can impact results and limit their generalizability when the purpose of the study is to examine the technological merit of hearing aids. To reduce personality influences on self-report outcome data, the Device-Oriented Subjective Outcome (DOSO) was developed. The DOSO is meant to demonstrate outcomes of the amplification device relatively independent of the individual's personality. Still, it is unknown if the DOSO achieves its original goal.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to examine the relationship between personality and the DOSO. The relationship between personality and several widely used hearing-related questionnaires was also examined.

RESEARCH DESIGN

This is a nonexperimental study using a correlational design.

STUDY SAMPLE

A total of 119 adult hearing aid wearers participated in the study.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

The NEO Five-Factor Inventory was used to measure five personality traits (Neuroticism, Extraversion, Openness, Agreeableness, and Conscientiousness). The initial (unaided) hearing disablement, residual (aided) hearing disablement, and hearing aid benefit and satisfaction was measured using the DOSO, Hearing Handicap Inventory for the Elderly/Adult, Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit, and Satisfaction with Amplification in Daily Life. The relationship between personality and each questionnaire was examined using a correlation analysis.

RESULTS

All of the DOSO subscales were found to be significantly correlated to personality, regardless of whether age and better-ear hearing thresholds were controlled. Individuals who reported poorer hearing aid outcomes tended to have higher Neuroticism scores, while those who scored higher in Extraversion, Openness, and Agreeableness were more likely to report better outcomes. Across DOSO subscales, the maximum variance explained by personality traits ranged from 6% to 11%. Consistent with the literature, ∼3-18% of the variance of other hearing-related questionnaires was attributable to personality.

CONCLUSIONS

The degree to which personality affects the DOSO is similar to other hearing-related questionnaires. Although the variance accounted for by personality is not large, researchers and clinicians should not assume that the results of the DOSO are independent of personality.

摘要

背景

自我报告问卷是评估助听器效果的常用方法。研究表明,人格因素可解释自我报告测量结果中5%-20%的差异。因此,当研究目的是检验助听器的技术优点时,这些影响可能会影响结果并限制其普遍性。为了减少人格因素对自我报告结果数据的影响,开发了面向设备的主观结果(DOSO)。DOSO旨在展示放大设备的效果,相对独立于个体的人格。然而,DOSO是否实现了其最初目标尚不清楚。

目的

本研究的目的是检验人格与DOSO之间的关系。还检验了人格与几份广泛使用的听力相关问卷之间的关系。

研究设计

这是一项采用相关设计的非实验性研究。

研究样本

共有119名成年助听器佩戴者参与了该研究。

数据收集与分析

使用大五人格量表测量五种人格特质(神经质、外向性、开放性、宜人性和尽责性)。使用DOSO、老年人/成年人听力障碍量表、助听器益处简要概况和日常生活中对放大效果的满意度来测量初始(未佩戴助听器时)听力障碍、残余(佩戴助听器后)听力障碍以及助听器益处和满意度。使用相关分析检验人格与每份问卷之间的关系。

结果

发现所有DOSO分量表均与人格显著相关,无论是否控制了年龄和较好耳的听力阈值。报告助听器效果较差的个体往往神经质得分较高,而外向性、开放性和宜人性得分较高的个体更有可能报告较好的效果。在DOSO各分量表中,人格特质解释的最大方差范围为6%至11%。与文献一致,其他听力相关问卷约3%-18%的方差可归因于人格。

结论

人格对DOSO的影响程度与其他听力相关问卷相似。虽然人格因素解释的方差不大,但研究人员和临床医生不应认为DOSO的结果独立于人格。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

10
Personality trait structure as a human universal.作为人类共性的人格特质结构
Am Psychol. 1997 May;52(5):509-16. doi: 10.1037//0003-066x.52.5.509.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验