Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Division of General Internal Medicine and Health Services Research, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California.
JAMA Health Forum. 2022 Mar 18;3(3):e220120. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2022.0120. eCollection 2022 Mar.
As US hospital expenditures continue to rise, understanding drivers of high-severity billing for hospitalized patients among inpatient physicians is critically important.
To evaluate high-severity billing trends of Medicare beneficiaries treated by hospitalists vs nonhospitalists.
This cohort study used Medicare fee-for-service claims of hospitalized patients from 2009 through 2018 to compare the proportion of high-severity billing between general medicine physicians classified as hospitalists vs nonhospitalists across initial, subsequent, and discharge hospital encounters. We compared physicians within the same hospital using hospital fixed effects and adjusted for patient demographics and comorbidities. Changes in the billing practices were assessed by investigating differences in slopes using an interaction term between physician type and time. Analyses were conducted between August 2021 and January 2022.
Treatment by hospitalists vs nonhospitalists.
High-severity billing for initial, subsequent, and discharge hospital encounters.
The sample included 3 121 260 and 1 855 678 Medicare beneficiaries treated by hospitalists vs nonhospitalists, respectively. In each year, mean age, proportion female, proportion Black and Hispanic dual status, and mean number of chronic conditions were similar among those treated by hospitalists vs nonhospitalists (standardized mean difference < .01). The number of hospitalists grew by 76%, from 23 390 in 2009 to 41 084 in 2018, whereas nonhospitalists decreased by 43.6% (53 758 to 30 289). The proportion of encounters performed by hospitalists increased for the initial hospital encounters (46.3% to 76%), subsequent encounters (46.8% to 76.7%), and discharge encounters (46.1% to 78.5%) over the 10-year period. The proportion of high-severity billing across the hospital, subsequent, and discharge encounters was consistently higher among hospitalists relative to nonhospitalists across all years. Compared with the trends for nonhospitalists, the proportion of high-severity billing grew by 0.46% per year (95% CI, 0.44% to 0.49%; < .001) for initial encounters, 0.38% per year (95% CI, 0.37% to 0.39%; < .001) for subsequent encounters, and by 1.1% per year (95% CI, 1.1% to 1.15%; < .001) for discharge encounters among hospitalists.
In this cohort study of Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries treated in hospitals, high-severity billing increased over time for hospital encounters at higher rates for hospitalists than for nonhospitalists. These differences do not appear to be explained by patient complexity. The increase in the number of hospitalists over time may be contributing to rising national costs related to hospital care.
随着美国医院支出持续攀升,了解住院医师对住院患者进行高严重程度计费的驱动因素至关重要。
评估住院医师与非住院医师治疗的医疗保险受益人的高严重程度计费趋势。
设计、设置和参与者:本队列研究使用了 2009 年至 2018 年住院患者的医疗保险按服务收费数据,比较了在初始、后续和出院住院就诊中,被归类为住院医师的内科医生与非住院医师之间高严重程度计费的比例。我们使用医院固定效应比较了同一医院内的医生,并根据患者的人口统计学特征和合并症进行了调整。通过调查使用医生类型和时间的交互项的斜率差异来评估计费做法的变化。分析于 2021 年 8 月至 2022 年 1 月进行。
由住院医师与非住院医师治疗。
初始、后续和出院医院就诊的高严重程度计费。
样本包括分别由住院医师与非住院医师治疗的 3121260 名和 1855678 名医疗保险受益人的数据。在每年中,接受住院医师与非住院医师治疗的患者的平均年龄、女性比例、黑人和西班牙裔双重身份比例以及平均慢性疾病数量相似(标准化均差<.01)。住院医师的数量增长了 76%,从 2009 年的 23390 人增加到 2018 年的 41084 人,而非住院医师的数量减少了 43.6%(从 53758 人减少到 30289 人)。在 10 年期间,住院医师进行初始住院就诊(46.3%至 76%)、后续就诊(46.8%至 76.7%)和出院就诊(46.1%至 78.5%)的比例有所增加。在所有年份中,与非住院医师相比,住院医师的高严重程度计费比例在整个医院、后续和出院就诊中均始终更高。与非住院医师的趋势相比,高严重程度计费的比例每年增长 0.46%(95%CI,0.44%至 0.49%;<.001),初始就诊时增长 0.38%(95%CI,0.37%至 0.39%;<.001),后续就诊时增长 1.1%(95%CI,1.1%至 1.15%;<.001),而在出院就诊时则增长 1.1%(95%CI,1.1%至 1.15%;<.001)。
在这项对接受医院治疗的医疗保险按服务收费受益人的队列研究中,高严重程度计费随着时间的推移而增加,并且在住院就诊中,住院医师的计费增加速度高于非住院医师。这些差异似乎不是由患者的复杂性造成的。随着时间的推移,住院医师数量的增加可能是导致与医院护理相关的国家成本上升的原因之一。