• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腹腔镜胆囊切除术后持续腹痛与增加的医疗保健消费和病假有关。

Persistent abdominal pain after laparoscopic cholecystectomy is associated with increased healthcare consumption and sick leave.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

Clinical Research Unit, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Surgery. 2018 Apr;163(4):661-666. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2017.09.004. Epub 2017 Nov 10.

DOI:10.1016/j.surg.2017.09.004
PMID:29133112
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Although, 33% to 40% of symptomatic gallstone patients reported persistent abdominal pain after laparoscopic cholecystectomy, there is no data on the burden of this pain to the healthcare system and society at large. This study determined healthcare consumption, sick leave, and costs in patients with persistent abdominal pain after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Secondly, predictive factors for healthcare consumption were assessed.

METHODS

This cross-sectional study included all 146 patients with persistent abdominal pain (patient-reported on Gastro-Intestinal Quality of Life Index (score 0-3) 24 weeks after laparoscopic cholecystectomy, derived from a previous prospective cohort. Healthcare consumption was assessed using Medical Consumption Questionnaire and medical records, and sick leave using Productivity Cost Questionnaire. Costs were calculated according "Guideline for performing economic evaluations in healthcare." Predictors of healthcare consumption were assessed using logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS

In the study, 124/146 patients (85%) responded after mean follow-up of 31.0 months (standard deviation 6.5); 104 were female, mean age of responders was 52 years. Sixty-nine patients needed additional healthcare; 30.6% primary care; 37.1% secondary care; 16% emergency department admission; 8.9% hospital admission; 33.9% diagnostic procedures; 17.7% medication; 5.6% other interventions. Medical costs were $555 (BCa 95% confidence interval, $329-$852) and costs of sick leave were $361 (Bias-corrected and accelerated (BCa) 95% confidence interval, $189-$566) per year per patient. Younger age (odds ratio 0.95, 95% confidence interval, 0.92-0.98) and higher postoperative pain score (odds ratio 1.02, 95% confidence interval, 1.01-1.04) were associated with increased healthcare consumption.

CONCLUSION

Persistent abdominal pain after laparoscopic cholecystectomy is associated with additional healthcare in 56% of patients. Yearly, medical costs and costs of sick leave are 20% of the initial costs of laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

摘要

背景

尽管有 33%至 40%的有症状胆石症患者在腹腔镜胆囊切除术后仍持续存在腹痛,但尚无关于此类疼痛给医疗保健系统和整个社会带来的负担的数据。本研究旨在确定腹腔镜胆囊切除术后持续性腹痛患者的医疗保健消费、病假和成本。其次,评估了医疗保健消费的预测因素。

方法

本横断面研究纳入了 146 例腹腔镜胆囊切除术后持续性腹痛患者(患者在腹腔镜胆囊切除术后 24 周使用胃肠道生活质量指数(评分 0-3)报告,该数据来自先前的前瞻性队列研究)。使用医疗消费问卷和医疗记录评估医疗保健消费,使用生产效率成本问卷评估病假。根据“医疗保健中进行经济评估的指南”计算成本。使用逻辑回归分析评估医疗保健消费的预测因素。

结果

在这项研究中,在平均 31.0 个月(标准差 6.5)的随访后,146 例患者中有 124 例(85%)做出了回应;104 例为女性,应答者的平均年龄为 52 岁。69 例患者需要额外的医疗保健;30.6%为初级保健;37.1%为二级保健;16%为急诊就诊;8.9%为住院治疗;33.9%为诊断程序;17.7%为药物治疗;5.6%为其他干预措施。每位患者每年的医疗费用为 555 美元(BCa 95%置信区间为 329-852 美元),病假费用为 361 美元(经校正和加速(BCa)95%置信区间为 189-566 美元)。年龄较小(比值比 0.95,95%置信区间为 0.92-0.98)和术后疼痛评分较高(比值比 1.02,95%置信区间为 1.01-1.04)与医疗保健消费增加相关。

结论

腹腔镜胆囊切除术后持续性腹痛导致 56%的患者需要额外的医疗保健。每年,医疗费用和病假费用占腹腔镜胆囊切除术初始费用的 20%。

相似文献

1
Persistent abdominal pain after laparoscopic cholecystectomy is associated with increased healthcare consumption and sick leave.腹腔镜胆囊切除术后持续腹痛与增加的医疗保健消费和病假有关。
Surgery. 2018 Apr;163(4):661-666. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2017.09.004. Epub 2017 Nov 10.
2
A randomized multicenter study of minilaparotomy cholecystectomy versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy with ultrasonic dissection in both groups.一项关于小切口胆囊切除术与两组均采用超声刀分离的腹腔镜胆囊切除术的随机多中心研究。
Scand J Gastroenterol. 2016 Mar;51(3):354-9. doi: 10.3109/00365521.2015.1091496. Epub 2015 Sep 28.
3
Economic and medical benefits of ultrasound screenings for gallstone disease.胆结石疾病超声筛查的经济和医学益处。
World J Gastroenterol. 2015 Mar 21;21(11):3337-43. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i11.3337.
4
Cost-minimization analysis in a blind randomized trial on small-incision versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy from a societal perspective: sick leave outweighs efforts in hospital savings.从社会角度对小切口胆囊切除术与腹腔镜胆囊切除术进行的盲法随机试验中的成本最小化分析:病假天数超过了医院节省的费用。
Trials. 2009 Sep 4;10:80. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-10-80.
5
Factors relevant to persistent upper abdominal pain after cholecystectomy.胆囊切除术后持续性上腹部疼痛的相关因素。
HPB (Oxford). 2017 Jul;19(7):629-637. doi: 10.1016/j.hpb.2017.04.003. Epub 2017 May 8.
6
Factors Associated With Outcomes and Costs After Pediatric Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy.小儿腹腔镜胆囊切除术的结果和费用相关因素。
JAMA Surg. 2018 Jun 1;153(6):551-557. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2017.5461.
7
Prospective multicentre cohort study of patient-reported outcomes after cholecystectomy for uncomplicated symptomatic cholecystolithiasis.胆囊切除术治疗单纯症状性胆囊结石病的患者报告结局的前瞻性多中心队列研究。
Br J Surg. 2015 Oct;102(11):1402-9. doi: 10.1002/bjs.9887. Epub 2015 Jul 22.
8
Laparoendoscopic single site (LESS) versus classic video-laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized prospective study.腹腔镜单部位(LESS)与传统腹腔镜胆囊切除术的随机前瞻性研究。
J Surg Res. 2011 Apr;166(2):e109-12. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2010.11.885. Epub 2010 Dec 22.
9
Cost-effectiveness of same-admission versus interval cholecystectomy after mild gallstone pancreatitis in the PONCHO trial.PONCHO 试验中轻度胆石性胰腺炎患者即刻与间期胆囊切除术的成本效果比较。
Br J Surg. 2016 Nov;103(12):1695-1703. doi: 10.1002/bjs.10222. Epub 2016 Aug 12.
10
Normalization of Serum Lipase Levels Versus Resolution of Abdominal Pain: A Comparison of Preoperative Management in Children With Biliary Pancreatitis.血清脂肪酶水平正常化与腹痛缓解情况对比:小儿胆源性胰腺炎术前管理的比较
J Surg Res. 2020 Aug;252:133-138. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2020.03.012. Epub 2020 Apr 9.

引用本文的文献

1
Research progress in the treatment of gallstones with laparoscopic and endoscopic surgery: a narrative review.腹腔镜与内镜手术治疗胆结石的研究进展:一项叙述性综述
BMC Surg. 2025 May 29;25(1):238. doi: 10.1186/s12893-025-02977-8.
2
Cholecystectomy and risk of cardiovascular disease, all-cause and cause-specific mortality: a systematic review and updated meta-analysis.胆囊切除术与心血管疾病、全因和病因特异性死亡率的关系:系统评价和更新的荟萃分析。
PeerJ. 2024 Sep 30;12:e18174. doi: 10.7717/peerj.18174. eCollection 2024.
3
Analgesic efficacy of intra-peritoneal instillation of dexamethasone and bupivacaine versus bupivacaine following laparoscopic cholecystectomy - A randomised, double-blind controlled study.
腹腔镜胆囊切除术后腹腔内注入地塞米松和布比卡因与单纯布比卡因相比的镇痛效果——一项随机、双盲对照研究。
Indian J Anaesth. 2023 Nov;67(11):999-1003. doi: 10.4103/ija.ija_275_23. Epub 2023 Nov 7.
4
Presurgical sleep and pain behaviors predict insomnia symptoms and pain after total knee arthroplasty: a 12-month longitudinal, observational study.术前睡眠和疼痛行为可预测全膝关节置换术后的失眠症状和疼痛:一项为期 12 个月的纵向观察研究。
Pain Med. 2023 Nov 2;24(11):1224-1233. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnad106.
5
Evidence-based clinical practice guidelines for cholelithiasis 2021.2021 年胆石病循证临床实践指南。
J Gastroenterol. 2023 Sep;58(9):801-833. doi: 10.1007/s00535-023-02014-6. Epub 2023 Jul 15.
6
Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: systematic review.腹腔镜胆囊切除术(LC)后的患者报告结局测量(PROM):系统评价。
BJS Open. 2022 May 2;6(3). doi: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrac062.
7
Efficacy and safety of different doses of ropivacaine for laparoscopy-assisted infiltration analgesia in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A prospective randomized control trial.不同剂量罗哌卡因用于腹腔镜胆囊切除术患者腹腔镜辅助浸润镇痛的疗效与安全性:一项前瞻性随机对照试验
Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Nov 13;99(46):e22540. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000022540.
8
Etiologies of Long-Term Postcholecystectomy Symptoms: A Systematic Review.胆囊切除术后长期症状的病因:一项系统评价
Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2019 Apr 14;2019:4278373. doi: 10.1155/2019/4278373. eCollection 2019.
9
Statistical analysis plan of a randomized controlled trial to compare a restrictive strategy to usual care for the effectiveness of cholecystectomy (SECURE trial).一项比较胆囊切除术限制性策略与常规护理有效性的随机对照试验的统计分析计划(SECURE试验)。
Trials. 2018 Nov 3;19(1):604. doi: 10.1186/s13063-018-2989-5.