Suppr超能文献

一项关于小切口胆囊切除术与两组均采用超声刀分离的腹腔镜胆囊切除术的随机多中心研究。

A randomized multicenter study of minilaparotomy cholecystectomy versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy with ultrasonic dissection in both groups.

作者信息

Aspinen Samuli, Harju Jukka, Kinnunen Mari, Juvonen Petri, Kokki Hannu, Eskelinen Matti

机构信息

a Department of Surgery , Kuopio University Hospital and School of Medicine, University of Eastern Finland , Kuopio , Finland ;

b Department of Surgery , Helsinki University Central Hospital , Helsinki , Finland ;

出版信息

Scand J Gastroenterol. 2016 Mar;51(3):354-9. doi: 10.3109/00365521.2015.1091496. Epub 2015 Sep 28.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Ultrasonic dissection (UsD) has been used in laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC), though it is not the golden standard technique. Applying UsD to cholecystectomy by minilaparotomy (MC) is less common and there are no prospective randomized trials comparing these two techniques. Therefore, we conducted the present study to investigate the use of the UsD in the MC versus the LC procedure.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Initially 104 patients with non-complicated symptomatic gallstone disease were randomized into MC (n = 53) or LC (n = 51) groups, both groups using UsD, over a period of 2 years (2013-2015). The study groups were similar in terms of age and American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status score.

RESULTS

The demographic variables and the surgical data were similar in the study groups. Similar low postoperative pain scores were reported in the two study groups during the first four hours after surgery. The incidence of nausea/vomiting was similar between the two study groups, 47% in the MC group versus 42% in the LC group. However, the patients in the MC group were treated more frequently with antiemetics, the incidence being 39% in the MC group versus 21% in the LC group (p = 0.02). The pain at rest at 24h after the surgery was similar in the two study groups, but the LC patients reported less pain at the normal activity, the mean of numerical rating scale (NRS) of 0-10 score being 3.9 in the MC group versus 2.9 in the LC group (p = 0.05), and the pain at the quick movement/coughing, the mean NRS being 4.9 in the MC group versus 3.2 in the LC group (p = 0.005). The length of sick leave was 17.4 days in the MC group and 14.4 days in the LC group (p = 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Our results suggest that both MC and LC are feasible and safe options for mini-invasive cholecystectomy. A new finding with clinical relevance in the present work is a relatively similar short-term outcome in the MC and LC although the LC patients reported significantly lower pain score 24 hours postoperatively and a shorter convalescence.

摘要

目的

超声解剖(UsD)已用于腹腔镜胆囊切除术(LC),尽管它并非金标准技术。将UsD应用于小切口胆囊切除术(MC)的情况较少见,且尚无比较这两种技术的前瞻性随机试验。因此,我们开展本研究以调查在MC与LC手术中使用UsD的情况。

材料与方法

在2年期间(2013 - 2015年),最初将104例患有非复杂性症状性胆结石疾病的患者随机分为MC组(n = 53)或LC组(n = 51),两组均使用UsD。研究组在年龄和美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)身体状况评分方面相似。

结果

研究组的人口统计学变量和手术数据相似。两个研究组在术后头四个小时报告的术后疼痛评分相似。两组恶心/呕吐的发生率相似,MC组为47%,LC组为42%。然而,MC组患者使用止吐药治疗的频率更高,MC组发生率为39%,LC组为21%(p = 0.02)。术后24小时静息时的疼痛在两个研究组中相似,但LC组患者在正常活动时报告的疼痛较轻,数字评分量表(NRS)0 - 10分的平均值在MC组为3.9,在LC组为2.9(p = 0.05),在快速移动/咳嗽时的疼痛,NRS平均值在MC组为4.9,在LC组为3.2(p = 0.005)。MC组病假时长为17.4天,LC组为14.4天(p = 0.05)。

结论

我们的结果表明,MC和LC都是微创胆囊切除术可行且安全的选择。本研究中有临床意义的一项新发现是,MC和LC的短期结果相对相似,尽管LC组患者术后24小时疼痛评分显著更低且康复期更短。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验