From the Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine, Jichi Medical University School of Medicine, Tochigi, Japan (S.H., H.M., K.K.); Department of Preventive Medicine, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson (Y.Y.); and Genki Plaza Medical Center for Health Care, Tokyo, Japan (H.K.).
Hypertension. 2018 Jan;71(1):177-184. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.117.10385. Epub 2017 Nov 13.
We assessed the relationship between day-by-day home blood pressure (BP) variability and incident cardiovascular disease (CVD) in clinical practice. J-HOP study (Japan Morning Surge-Home Blood Pressure) participants underwent home BP monitoring in the morning and evening for a 14-day period, and their BP levels and BP variability independent of the mean (VIM) were assessed. Incident CVD events included coronary heart disease and stroke. Cox models were fitted to assess the home BP variability-CVD risk association. Among 4231 participants (mean±SD age, 64.9±10.9 years; 53.3% women; 79.1% taking antihypertensive medication), mean (SD) home systolic BP (SBP) levels over time and VIM were 134.2 (14.3) and 6.8 (2.5) mm Hg, respectively. During a 4-year follow-up period (16 750.3 person-years), 148 CVD events occurred. VIM was associated with CVD risk (hazard ratio per 1-SD increase, 1.32; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.15-1.52), independently of mean home SBP levels over time and circulating B-type natriuretic peptide levels or urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio. Adding VIM to the CVD prediction model improved the discrimination (C statistic, 0.785 versus 0.770; C statistic difference, 0.015; 95% CI, 0.003-0.028). Changes in continuous net reclassification improvement (0.259; 95% CI, 0.052-0.537), absolute integrated discrimination improvement (0.010; 95% CI, 0.003-0.016), and relative integrated discrimination improvement (0.104; 95% CI, 0.037-0.166) were also observed with the addition of VIM to the CVD prediction models. In addition to the assessments of mean home SBP levels and cardiovascular end-organ damage, home BP variability measurements may provide a clinically useful distinction between high- and low-risk groups among Japanese outpatients.
我们评估了日常家庭血压(BP)变异性与临床实践中心血管疾病(CVD)事件之间的关系。J-HOP 研究(日本晨间血压-家庭血压)参与者进行了为期 14 天的早晚家庭血压监测,并评估了他们的血压水平和独立于均值的血压变异性(VIM)。心血管疾病事件包括冠心病和中风。采用 Cox 模型评估家庭 BP 变异性与 CVD 风险的关联。在 4231 名参与者(平均年龄±标准差,64.9±10.9 岁;53.3%为女性;79.1%服用降压药)中,随着时间的推移,平均(标准差)家庭收缩压(SBP)水平和 VIM 分别为 134.2(14.3)和 6.8(2.5)mmHg。在 4 年的随访期间(16750.3 人年),发生了 148 例 CVD 事件。VIM 与 CVD 风险相关(每增加 1-SD 的危险比,1.32;95%置信区间[CI],1.15-1.52),独立于随时间推移的平均家庭 SBP 水平以及循环 B 型利钠肽水平或尿白蛋白与肌酐比值。将 VIM 添加到 CVD 预测模型中提高了区分度(C 统计量,0.785 与 0.770;C 统计量差异,0.015;95%CI,0.003-0.028)。连续净重新分类改善(0.259;95%CI,0.052-0.537)、绝对综合判别改善(0.010;95%CI,0.003-0.016)和相对综合判别改善(0.104;95%CI,0.037-0.166)也随着 VIM 添加到 CVD 预测模型中而得到改善。除了评估平均家庭 SBP 水平和心血管终末器官损伤外,家庭 BP 变异性测量可能为日本门诊患者的高危和低危人群之间提供了一种有临床意义的区分。