NIHR Greater Manchester Primary Care Patient Safety Translational Research Centre, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
Centre for Health Economics, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.
Ann Fam Med. 2017 Nov;15(6):570-577. doi: 10.1370/afm.2150.
Multimorbidity challenges health systems globally. New models of care are urgently needed to better manage patients with multimorbidity; however, there is no agreed framework for designing and reporting models of care for multimorbidity and their evaluation.
Based on findings from a literature search to identify models of care for multimorbidity, we developed a framework to describe these models. We illustrate the application of the framework by identifying the focus and gaps in current models of care, and by describing the evolution of models over time.
Our framework describes each model in terms of its theoretical basis and target population (the foundations of the model) and of the elements of care implemented to deliver the model. We categorized elements of care into 3 types: (1) clinical focus, (2) organization of care, (3) support for model delivery. Application of the framework identified a limited use of theory in model design and a strong focus on some patient groups (elderly, high users) more than others (younger patients, deprived populations). We found changes in elements with time, with a decrease in models implementing home care and an increase in models offering extended appointments.
By encouragin greater clarity about the underpinning theory and target population, and by categorizing the wide range of potentially important elements of an intervention to improve care for patients with multimorbidity, the framework may be useful in designing and reporting models of care and help advance the currently limited evidence base.
多种疾病给全球的医疗体系带来了挑战。急需新的医疗模式来更好地管理患有多种疾病的患者;然而,目前还没有一个被广泛认可的框架来设计和报告多种疾病的医疗模式及其评估方法。
根据一项旨在确定多种疾病管理模式的文献检索结果,我们制定了一个框架来描述这些模式。我们通过确定当前多种疾病管理模式的重点和差距,并描述模型随时间的演变,说明了该框架的应用。
我们的框架从理论基础和目标人群(模型的基础)以及实施护理的要素两个方面描述了每个模型。我们将护理要素分为 3 种类型:(1)临床重点,(2)护理组织,(3)模型实施支持。该框架的应用确定了理论在模型设计中的应用有限,并且对某些患者群体(老年人、高使用者)的关注程度超过了其他群体(年轻患者、贫困人群)。我们发现随着时间的推移,要素发生了变化,实施家庭护理的模型减少,提供延长预约的模型增加。
通过鼓励更清楚地说明基础理论和目标人群,并对改善多种疾病患者护理的广泛潜在重要干预要素进行分类,该框架可能有助于设计和报告医疗模式,并有助于推进目前有限的证据基础。