• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

动机性访谈和尿可替宁反馈以阻止易患哮喘儿童的被动吸烟暴露:一项随机对照试验。

Motivational interviewing and urine cotinine feedback to stop passive smoke exposure in children predisposed to asthma: a randomised controlled trial.

作者信息

Hutchinson Sasha G, van Breukelen Gerard, van Schayck Constant P, Essers Brigitte, Hammond S Katharine, Muris Jean W M, Feron Frans J M, Dompeling Edward

机构信息

Department of Paediatric Pulmonology, Maastricht University Medical Center (MUMC+)/CAPHRI School for Public Health and Primary Care, P.O. Box 616, 6200 MD, Maastricht, The Netherlands.

Department of Methodology and Statistics, MUMC+/CAPHRI, P.O. Box 616, 6200 MD, Maastricht, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2017 Nov 13;7(1):15473. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-15158-2.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-017-15158-2
PMID:29133798
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5684321/
Abstract

We tested the effectiveness of a program consisting of motivational interviewing (MI) and feedback of urine cotinine to stop passive smoking (PS) in children at risk for asthma. Fifty-eight families with children 0-13 years with a high risk of asthma and PS exposure were randomised in a one-year follow-up study. The intervention group received the intervention program during 6 sessions (1/month) and the control group received measurements (questionnaires, urine cotinine, and lung function) only. The primary outcome measure was the percentage of families stopping PS (parental report verified and unverified with the child's urine cotinine concentration <10 μg/l) in children during the intervention program. The analyses were performed with Mixed Logistic Regression. After 6 months, a significant group difference was observed for the unverified parental report of stopping PS in children: 27% of parents in the intervention group versus 7% in the control group. For the verified parental report, the difference was similar (23% versus 7%) but was not statistically significant. Despite a limited sample size, the results suggest that the intervention program is probably an effective strategy to stop PS in children. A program longer than 6 months might be necessary for a longer lasting intervention effect.

摘要

我们测试了一项由动机性访谈(MI)和尿可替宁反馈组成的项目在有哮喘风险的儿童中阻止被动吸烟(PS)的效果。在一项为期一年的随访研究中,将58个有0至13岁儿童且有高哮喘风险和被动吸烟暴露的家庭随机分组。干预组在6次 sessions(每月1次)期间接受干预项目,而对照组仅接受测量(问卷调查、尿可替宁和肺功能)。主要结局指标是在干预项目期间儿童中停止被动吸烟的家庭百分比(父母报告经核实和未经核实且儿童尿可替宁浓度<10μg/l)。分析采用混合逻辑回归进行。6个月后,在儿童停止被动吸烟的未经核实的父母报告方面观察到显著的组间差异:干预组中27%的父母报告,而对照组为7%。对于经核实的父母报告,差异相似(23%对7%)但无统计学意义。尽管样本量有限,但结果表明该干预项目可能是阻止儿童被动吸烟的有效策略。可能需要一个超过6个月的项目以获得更持久的干预效果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/465c/5684321/65fcae6704c3/41598_2017_15158_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/465c/5684321/0dddfe1149af/41598_2017_15158_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/465c/5684321/65fcae6704c3/41598_2017_15158_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/465c/5684321/0dddfe1149af/41598_2017_15158_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/465c/5684321/65fcae6704c3/41598_2017_15158_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Motivational interviewing and urine cotinine feedback to stop passive smoke exposure in children predisposed to asthma: a randomised controlled trial.动机性访谈和尿可替宁反馈以阻止易患哮喘儿童的被动吸烟暴露:一项随机对照试验。
Sci Rep. 2017 Nov 13;7(1):15473. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-15158-2.
2
A motivational interviewing intervention to PREvent PAssive Smoke Exposure (PREPASE) in children with a high risk of asthma: design of a randomised controlled trial.一项预防哮喘高危儿童被动吸烟暴露(PREPASE)的动机性访谈干预研究:一项随机对照试验的设计。
BMC Public Health. 2013 Feb 27;13:177. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-13-177.
3
A randomized trial of parental behavioral counseling and cotinine feedback for lowering environmental tobacco smoke exposure in children with asthma: results of the LET'S Manage Asthma trial.一项针对父母行为咨询和可替宁反馈降低哮喘儿童环境烟草烟雾暴露的随机试验:LET'S Manage Asthma 试验结果。
Chest. 2011 Mar;139(3):581-590. doi: 10.1378/chest.10-0772. Epub 2010 Sep 23.
4
Secondhand tobacco smoke in children with asthma: sources of and parental perceptions about exposure in children and parental readiness to change.哮喘儿童中的二手烟草烟雾:儿童接触的来源、父母对其的认知以及父母改变的意愿。
Chest. 2008 Jun;133(6):1367-1374. doi: 10.1378/chest.07-2369. Epub 2008 Mar 13.
5
Urinary cotinine as a measure of passive smoke exposure in asthmatic children.尿可替宁作为哮喘儿童被动吸烟暴露的一项指标。
Clin Pediatr (Phila). 1994 Apr;33(4):220-6. doi: 10.1177/000992289403300406.
6
Reducing tobacco smoke in the environment of the child with asthma: a cotinine-assisted, minimal-contact intervention.减少哮喘儿童环境中的烟草烟雾:一项可替宁辅助的、接触最少的干预措施。
J Asthma. 1994;31(6):453-62. doi: 10.3109/02770909409089487.
7
Advising parents of asthmatic children on passive smoking: randomised controlled trial.就被动吸烟问题向哮喘儿童家长提供建议:随机对照试验。
BMJ. 1999 May 29;318(7196):1456-9. doi: 10.1136/bmj.318.7196.1456.
8
Association between Parental Cotinine-verified Smoking Status and Childhood Asthma: a Population-based Nationally Representative Analysis.父母可替烟检测吸烟状况与儿童哮喘的关系:基于人群的全国代表性分析。
J Korean Med Sci. 2021 Aug 2;36(30):e193. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2021.36.e193.
9
Does passive smoke exposure trigger acute asthma attack in children?被动接触烟雾会引发儿童急性哮喘发作吗?
Allergol Immunopathol (Madr). 2003 Nov-Dec;31(6):318-23. doi: 10.1016/s0301-0546(03)79205-2.
10
A controlled trial of an environmental tobacco smoke reduction intervention in low-income children with asthma.一项针对低收入哮喘儿童的减少环境烟草烟雾干预措施的对照试验。
Chest. 2001 Nov;120(5):1709-22. doi: 10.1378/chest.120.5.1709.

引用本文的文献

1
Towards Prepared mums (TOP-mums) for a healthy start, a lifestyle intervention for women with overweight and a child wish: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial in the Netherlands.迈向健康起点的有准备妈妈(TOP-mums):针对超重且有生育意愿妇女的生活方式干预:荷兰一项随机对照试验的研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2019 Nov 19;9(11):e030236. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030236.
2
Motivational interviewing for smoking cessation.用于戒烟的动机性访谈。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Jul 31;7(7):CD006936. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006936.pub4.

本文引用的文献

1
Addressing passive smoking in children.解决儿童被动吸烟问题。
PLoS One. 2014 May 8;9(5):e93220. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0093220. eCollection 2014.
2
Family and carer smoking control programmes for reducing children's exposure to environmental tobacco smoke.减少儿童接触环境烟草烟雾的家庭及照料者吸烟控制项目。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Mar 1(3):CD001746. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001746.pub3.
3
Reducing children's exposure to secondhand smoke at home: a randomized trial.减少儿童在家中接触二手烟:一项随机试验。
Pediatrics. 2013 Dec;132(6):1071-80. doi: 10.1542/peds.2012-2351. Epub 2013 Nov 4.
4
Multifactorial intervention for children with asthma and overweight (Mikado): study design of a randomised controlled trial.多因素干预对哮喘合并超重儿童的影响(Mikado):一项随机对照试验的研究设计。
BMC Public Health. 2013 May 21;13:494. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-13-494.
5
How to minimize children's environmental tobacco smoke exposure: an intervention in a clinical setting in high risk areas.如何将儿童的环境烟草烟雾暴露降至最低:在高风险地区临床环境中的一项干预措施。
BMC Pediatr. 2013 May 15;13:76. doi: 10.1186/1471-2431-13-76.
6
Meta-analysis of the association between secondhand smoke exposure and physician-diagnosed childhood asthma.二手烟暴露与医生诊断的儿童哮喘关联性的荟萃分析。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2013 Sep;15(9):1475-83. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntt033. Epub 2013 Mar 28.
7
A motivational interviewing intervention to PREvent PAssive Smoke Exposure (PREPASE) in children with a high risk of asthma: design of a randomised controlled trial.一项预防哮喘高危儿童被动吸烟暴露(PREPASE)的动机性访谈干预研究:一项随机对照试验的设计。
BMC Public Health. 2013 Feb 27;13:177. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-13-177.
8
Intervention to reduce secondhand smoke exposure among children with cancer: a controlled trial.减少癌症患儿二手烟暴露的干预措施:一项对照试验。
Psychooncology. 2013 May;22(5):1104-11. doi: 10.1002/pon.3117. Epub 2012 Jun 8.
9
REFRESH--reducing families' exposure to secondhand smoke in the home: a feasibility study.REFRESH--减少家庭中二手烟暴露:一项可行性研究。
Tob Control. 2013 Sep;22(5):e8. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2011-050212. Epub 2012 May 21.
10
Is the socioeconomic gap in childhood exposure to secondhand smoke widening or narrowing?儿童期二手烟暴露的社会经济差距是扩大还是缩小了?
Tob Control. 2013 Sep;22(5):344-8. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2011-050297. Epub 2012 Mar 30.