Suppr超能文献

就被动吸烟问题向哮喘儿童家长提供建议:随机对照试验。

Advising parents of asthmatic children on passive smoking: randomised controlled trial.

作者信息

Irvine L, Crombie I K, Clark R A, Slane P W, Feyerabend C, Goodman K E, Cater J I

机构信息

Department of Child Health, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, Dundee DD1 9SY.

出版信息

BMJ. 1999 May 29;318(7196):1456-9. doi: 10.1136/bmj.318.7196.1456.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To investigate whether parents of asthmatic children would stop smoking or alter their smoking habits to protect their children from environmental tobacco smoke.

DESIGN

Randomised controlled trial.

SETTING

Tayside and Fife, Scotland.

PARTICIPANTS

501 families with an asthmatic child aged 2-12 years living with a parent who smoked.

INTERVENTION

Parents were told about the impact of passive smoking on asthma and were advised to stop smoking or change their smoking habits to protect their child's health.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Salivary cotinine concentrations in children, and changes in reported smoking habits of the parents 1 year after the intervention.

RESULTS

At the second visit, about 1 year after the baseline visit, a small decrease in salivary cotinine concentrations was found in both groups of children: the mean decrease in the intervention group (0.70 ng/ml) was slightly smaller than that of the control group (0.88 ng/ml), but the net difference of 0.19 ng/ml had a wide 95% confidence interval (-0.86 to 0.48). Overall, 98% of parents in both groups still smoked at follow up. However, there was a non-significant tendency for parents in the intervention group to report smoking more at follow up and to having a reduced desire to stop smoking.

CONCLUSIONS

A brief intervention to advise parents of asthmatic children about the risks from passive smoking was ineffective in reducing their children's exposure to environmental tobacco smoke. The intervention may have made some parents less inclined to stop smoking. If a clinician believes that a child's health is being affected by parental smoking, the parent's smoking needs to be addressed as a separate issue from the child's health.

摘要

目的

调查哮喘儿童的父母是否会为保护孩子免受环境烟草烟雾危害而戒烟或改变吸烟习惯。

设计

随机对照试验。

地点

苏格兰泰赛德和法夫。

参与者

501个家庭,家中有一名2至12岁的哮喘儿童,且有一位家长吸烟。

干预措施

告知家长被动吸烟对哮喘的影响,并建议他们戒烟或改变吸烟习惯以保护孩子的健康。

主要观察指标

干预1年后儿童唾液中可替宁的浓度,以及家长报告的吸烟习惯变化。

结果

在基线访视约1年后的第二次访视时,两组儿童的唾液可替宁浓度均有小幅下降:干预组的平均下降值(0.70纳克/毫升)略低于对照组(0.88纳克/毫升),但0.19纳克/毫升的净差异有较宽的95%置信区间(-0.86至0.48)。总体而言,两组中98%的家长在随访时仍在吸烟。然而,干预组的家长在随访时报告吸烟量增加且戒烟意愿降低,这一趋势无统计学意义。

结论

向哮喘儿童家长简要告知被动吸烟的风险,对于减少其孩子接触环境烟草烟雾并无效果。该干预措施可能使一些家长更不愿意戒烟。如果临床医生认为儿童健康受到家长吸烟的影响,家长吸烟问题需要与儿童健康问题分开处理。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

9
Asthma Exacerbations: Pathogenesis, Prevention, and Treatment.哮喘恶化:发病机制、预防和治疗。
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2017 Jul-Aug;5(4):918-927. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2017.05.001.

本文引用的文献

4
Evaluation of antismoking advertising campaigns.反吸烟广告活动评估。
JAMA. 1998 Mar 11;279(10):772-7. doi: 10.1001/jama.279.10.772.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验