• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

度拉糖肽1.5mg与艾塞那肽每日一次用于治疗法国2型糖尿病患者的成本效益分析

The Cost-effectiveness of Dulaglutide 1.5mg versus Exenatide QW for the Treatment of Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in France.

作者信息

Basson Mickael, Ntais Dionysios, Ayyub Ruba, Wright Donna, Lowin Julia, Chartier Florence, Roze Stéphane, Norrbacka Kirsi

机构信息

Eli Lilly, Neuilly-sur-Seine, France.

QuintilesIMS, London, UK.

出版信息

Diabetes Ther. 2018 Feb;9(1):13-25. doi: 10.1007/s13300-017-0321-0. Epub 2017 Nov 13.

DOI:10.1007/s13300-017-0321-0
PMID:29134607
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5801216/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Dulaglutide is a novel onceweekly administered glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonist (GLP-1 RA) for the management of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). The objective of this analysis was to estimate the cost-effectiveness of dulaglutide 1.5 mg versus exenatide QW for the management of T2DM in France.

METHODS

The QuintilesIMS CORE Diabetes Model was used to estimate the expected lifetime direct medical costs and outcomes of T2DM from the perspective of the French National Health Service. In the absence of head-to-head data, relative efficacy was derived from a network meta-analysis. Patient cohort characteristics were derived from the AWARD-2 trial. All patients were assumed to remain on treatment for 2 years before escalating to insulin therapy. Costs included treatment costs and costs associated with long-term complications of T2DM. Utilities were estimated based on a recent systematic review. One-way sensitivity analyses (OWSA) and probabilistic sensitivity analysis (PSA) were conducted. Cost-effectiveness acceptability curves (CEACs) were generated.

RESULTS

Dulaglutide 1.5 mg was associated with lower costs (lifetime costs €41,562 vs €43,021) and increased health benefits (lifetime quality-adjusted life years: QALYs 9.804 vs 9.757) versus exenatide QW for the treatment of T2DM in France. OWSA and PSA indicated that results were robust across a range of plausible input parameters. The CEAC indicated a 99.5% probability that dulaglutide would be considered cost-effective at a willingness to pay of €30,000.

CONCLUSION

Dulaglutide 1.5 mg reduced expected costs and increased expected QALYs when compared against exenatide QW for the treatment of T2DM in France. Compared with exenatide QW, dulaglutide 1.5 mg can provide additional health benefits for patients with T2DM and may result in cost savings for payers.

FUNDING

Eli Lilly.

摘要

简介

度拉糖肽是一种新型的每周一次给药的胰高血糖素样肽-1受体激动剂(GLP-1 RA),用于治疗2型糖尿病(T2DM)。本分析的目的是评估度拉糖肽1.5毫克与艾塞那肽每周一次给药方案在法国治疗T2DM的成本效益。

方法

采用昆泰IMS核心糖尿病模型,从法国国家医疗服务体系的角度估算T2DM的预期终身直接医疗成本和治疗效果。在缺乏直接对比数据的情况下,相对疗效来自网络荟萃分析。患者队列特征来自AWARD-2试验。所有患者假定在升级为胰岛素治疗前持续治疗2年。成本包括治疗成本以及与T2DM长期并发症相关的成本。效用值基于近期的一项系统评价进行估算。进行了单因素敏感性分析(OWSA)和概率敏感性分析(PSA)。生成了成本效益可接受性曲线(CEAC)。

结果

在法国治疗T2DM时,与艾塞那肽每周一次给药方案相比,度拉糖肽1.5毫克的成本更低(终身成本41,562欧元对43,021欧元),健康效益更高(终身质量调整生命年:QALYs 9.804对9.757)。OWSA和PSA表明,在一系列合理的输入参数范围内,结果是稳健的。CEAC表明,在支付意愿为30,000欧元时;度拉糖肽被认为具有成本效益的概率为99.5%。

结论

在法国治疗T2DM时,与艾塞那肽每周一次给药方案相比,度拉糖肽1.5毫克降低了预期成本,提高了预期QALYs。与艾塞那肽每周一次给药方案相比,度拉糖肽1.5毫克可为T2DM患者提供额外的健康效益,并可能为支付方节省成本。

资助

礼来公司。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/00db/5801216/ab736598ff8b/13300_2017_321_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/00db/5801216/4cc42eee69e2/13300_2017_321_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/00db/5801216/ab736598ff8b/13300_2017_321_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/00db/5801216/4cc42eee69e2/13300_2017_321_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/00db/5801216/ab736598ff8b/13300_2017_321_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
The Cost-effectiveness of Dulaglutide 1.5mg versus Exenatide QW for the Treatment of Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in France.度拉糖肽1.5mg与艾塞那肽每日一次用于治疗法国2型糖尿病患者的成本效益分析
Diabetes Ther. 2018 Feb;9(1):13-25. doi: 10.1007/s13300-017-0321-0. Epub 2017 Nov 13.
2
The cost-effectiveness of dulaglutide versus liraglutide for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus in Spain in patients with BMI ≥30 kg/m.度拉糖肽与利拉鲁肽治疗西班牙体重指数(BMI)≥30kg/m²的2型糖尿病患者的成本效益
J Med Econ. 2017 May;20(5):443-452. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2016.1275651. Epub 2017 Jan 13.
3
Cost-effectiveness analysis of exenatide once-weekly versus dulaglutide, liraglutide, and lixisenatide for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus: an analysis from the UK NHS perspective.从英国国家医疗服务体系(NHS)角度分析,度拉糖肽、利拉鲁肽和利司那肽与艾塞那肽每周一次治疗2型糖尿病的成本效益分析。
J Med Econ. 2016 Dec;19(12):1127-1134. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2016.1203329. Epub 2016 Jun 28.
4
Treatment Patterns and Persistence With GLP-1 RA Treatments Among Patients With Type 2 Diabetes in France: A Retrospective Cohort Analysis.法国2型糖尿病患者中GLP-1受体激动剂治疗模式及持续性:一项回顾性队列分析
Diabetes Ther. 2021 May;12(5):1553-1567. doi: 10.1007/s13300-021-01055-5. Epub 2021 Apr 17.
5
Glucagon-Like Peptide 1 Receptor Agonists in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: Data from a Real-World Study in Spain.2型糖尿病中胰高血糖素样肽1受体激动剂:来自西班牙一项真实世界研究的数据。
Diabetes Ther. 2021 May;12(5):1535-1551. doi: 10.1007/s13300-021-01039-5. Epub 2021 Apr 16.
6
Management of Patients with Type 2 Diabetes with Once-Weekly Semaglutide Versus Dulaglutide, Exenatide ER, Liraglutide and Lixisenatide: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis in the Danish Setting.在丹麦环境下,每周一次司美格鲁肽与度拉鲁肽、艾塞那肽缓释剂、利拉鲁肽和利司那肽治疗2型糖尿病患者的成本效益分析
Diabetes Ther. 2019 Aug;10(4):1297-1317. doi: 10.1007/s13300-019-0630-6. Epub 2019 May 16.
7
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Exenatide versus GLP-1 Receptor Agonists in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.艾塞那肽与GLP-1受体激动剂治疗2型糖尿病患者的成本效益分析
Pharmacoecon Open. 2020 Jun;4(2):277-286. doi: 10.1007/s41669-019-0171-y.
8
The Management of Type 2 Diabetes with Once-Weekly Semaglutide Versus Dulaglutide: A Long-Term Cost-Effectiveness Analysis in Slovakia.在斯洛伐克,每周一次司美格鲁肽与每周一次度拉鲁肽治疗 2 型糖尿病的管理:一项长期成本效益分析。
Adv Ther. 2019 Aug;36(8):2034-2051. doi: 10.1007/s12325-019-00965-y. Epub 2019 Jun 5.
9
The short-term cost-effectiveness of once-daily liraglutide versus once-weekly exenatide for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus in the United States.在美国,每日一次利拉鲁肽与每周一次艾塞那肽治疗2型糖尿病的短期成本效益比较
PLoS One. 2015 Apr 7;10(4):e0121915. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0121915. eCollection 2015.
10
The long-term cost-effectiveness of oral semaglutide versus empagliflozin and dulaglutide in Portugal.在葡萄牙,口服司美格鲁肽与恩格列净和度拉鲁肽的长期成本效益比较
Diabetol Metab Syndr. 2022 Feb 14;14(1):32. doi: 10.1186/s13098-022-00801-4.

引用本文的文献

1
Adverse drug events in cost-effectiveness models of pharmacological interventions for diabetes, diabetic retinopathy, and diabetic macular edema: a scoping review.糖尿病、糖尿病视网膜病变和糖尿病黄斑水肿药物干预成本效益模型中的药物不良事件:一项范围综述
JBI Evid Synth. 2024 Nov 1;22(11):2194-2266. doi: 10.11124/JBIES-23-00511.
2
A Systematic Review of Cost-Effectiveness Studies of Newer Non-Insulin Antidiabetic Drugs: Trends in Decision-Analytical Models for Modelling of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.新型非胰岛素抗糖尿病药物成本效益研究的系统评价:用于模拟 2 型糖尿病的决策分析模型的趋势。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2023 Nov;41(11):1469-1514. doi: 10.1007/s40273-023-01268-5. Epub 2023 Jul 6.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Evaluation of the long-term cost-effectiveness of liraglutide therapy for patients with type 2 diabetes in France.法国2型糖尿病患者使用利拉鲁肽治疗的长期成本效益评估。
J Med Econ. 2016;19(2):121-34. doi: 10.3111/13696998.2015.1100998. Epub 2015 Nov 5.
2
Efficacy and Safety of Once-Weekly Dulaglutide Versus Insulin Glargine in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes on Metformin and Glimepiride (AWARD-2).在二甲双胍和格列美脲治疗的 2 型糖尿病患者中,每周一次度拉鲁肽与甘精胰岛素的疗效和安全性(AWARD-2)。
Diabetes Care. 2015 Dec;38(12):2241-9. doi: 10.2337/dc14-1625. Epub 2015 Jun 18.
3
Once-weekly dulaglutide versus bedtime insulin glargine, both in combination with prandial insulin lispro, in patients with type 2 diabetes (AWARD-4): a randomised, open-label, phase 3, non-inferiority study.
Cost-Utility Analysis of Once-Weekly Semaglutide, Dulaglutide, and Exenatide for Type 2 Diabetes Patients Receiving Metformin-Based Background Therapy in China.
在中国,接受以二甲双胍为基础背景治疗的2型糖尿病患者使用司美格鲁肽、度拉糖肽和艾塞那肽每周一次治疗的成本-效用分析
Front Pharmacol. 2022 Feb 18;13:831364. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2022.831364. eCollection 2022.
4
Costs and where to find them: identifying unit costs for health economic evaluations of diabetes in France, Germany and Italy.成本及其来源:确定法国、德国和意大利糖尿病卫生经济评价的单位成本。
Eur J Health Econ. 2020 Nov;21(8):1179-1196. doi: 10.1007/s10198-020-01229-1. Epub 2020 Oct 6.
5
Cost-Utility Analysis of Dapagliflozin Versus Saxagliptin Treatment as Monotherapy or Combination Therapy as Add-on to Metformin for Treating Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.达格列净与沙格列汀单药治疗或作为二甲双胍附加联合治疗2型糖尿病的成本-效用分析
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2021 Jan;19(1):69-79. doi: 10.1007/s40258-020-00603-7.
6
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Exenatide versus GLP-1 Receptor Agonists in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.艾塞那肽与GLP-1受体激动剂治疗2型糖尿病患者的成本效益分析
Pharmacoecon Open. 2020 Jun;4(2):277-286. doi: 10.1007/s41669-019-0171-y.
7
Cost Effectiveness of Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) Inhibitors, Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 (GLP-1) Receptor Agonists, and Dipeptidyl Peptidase-4 (DPP-4) Inhibitors: A Systematic Review.钠-葡萄糖共转运蛋白 2(SGLT2)抑制剂、胰高血糖素样肽-1(GLP-1)受体激动剂和二肽基肽酶-4(DPP-4)抑制剂的成本效益:系统评价。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2019 Jun;37(6):777-818. doi: 10.1007/s40273-019-00774-9.
每周一次度拉鲁肽对比睡前胰岛素甘精,均联合餐时胰岛素赖脯氨酸,用于治疗 2 型糖尿病患者(AWARD-4):一项随机、开放标签、3 期、非劣效性研究。
Lancet. 2015 May 23;385(9982):2057-66. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)60936-9.
4
Glucagon-like Peptide-1 receptor agonist treatment patterns among type 2 diabetes patients in six European countries.六个欧洲国家2型糖尿病患者中胰高血糖素样肽-1受体激动剂的治疗模式
Diabetes Ther. 2014 Dec;5(2):499-520. doi: 10.1007/s13300-014-0087-6. Epub 2014 Nov 4.
5
Validation of the IMS CORE Diabetes Model.IMS核心糖尿病模型的验证
Value Health. 2014 Sep;17(6):714-24. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2014.07.007.
6
Once-weekly dulaglutide versus once-daily liraglutide in metformin-treated patients with type 2 diabetes (AWARD-6): a randomised, open-label, phase 3, non-inferiority trial.每周一次度拉鲁肽对比每日一次利拉鲁肽治疗二甲双胍控制不佳的 2 型糖尿病患者(AWARD-6):一项随机、开放标签、3 期、非劣效性试验。
Lancet. 2014 Oct 11;384(9951):1349-57. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60976-4. Epub 2014 Jul 10.
7
Review of utility values for economic modeling in type 2 diabetes.2 型糖尿病经济建模效用值的评价。
Value Health. 2014 Jun;17(4):462-70. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2014.03.003. Epub 2014 May 17.
8
Efficacy and safety of dulaglutide added onto pioglitazone and metformin versus exenatide in type 2 diabetes in a randomized controlled trial (AWARD-1).在一项随机对照试验(AWARD-1)中,与艾塞那肽相比,将度拉糖肽加用在吡格列酮和二甲双胍基础上治疗 2 型糖尿病的疗效和安全性。
Diabetes Care. 2014 Aug;37(8):2159-67. doi: 10.2337/dc13-2760. Epub 2014 May 30.
9
Efficacy and safety of dulaglutide monotherapy versus metformin in type 2 diabetes in a randomized controlled trial (AWARD-3).在一项随机对照试验(AWARD-3)中,度拉鲁肽单药治疗与二甲双胍治疗 2 型糖尿病的疗效和安全性。
Diabetes Care. 2014 Aug;37(8):2168-76. doi: 10.2337/dc13-2759. Epub 2014 May 19.
10
Outcomes and treatment patterns of adding a third agent to 2 OADs in patients with type 2 diabetes.在接受两种口服降糖药治疗的 2 型糖尿病患者中添加第三种药物的治疗结局和治疗模式。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2014 May;20(5):501-12. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2014.20.5.501.