Murtaugh C M, Kemper P, Spillman B C
Medical Technology and Practice Patterns Institute, Washington DC 20007-2258, USA.
Inquiry. 1995 Fall;32(3):271-84.
Private insurance is one strategy for financing the large and growing cost of long-term care. Little is known, however, about the extent to which medical underwriting may limit the potential of private insurance to cover nursing home care, or whether the underwriting criteria used in this relatively new market successfully identify high-cost groups. This paper uses data from the National Mortality Followback Survey to address these two questions. We estimate that between 12% and 23% of the population would be rejected for private long-term care insurance because of their health if everyone applied at age 65. These figures rise to between 20% and 31% at age 75. Our simulation results suggest that long-term care insurance underwriting criteria identify individuals who vary substantially in the financial risk they pose to insurers. In most cases, whether a criterion identifies a high-cost group is sensitive to the policy individuals are assumed to buy.
私人保险是为长期护理的巨大且不断增长的成本融资的一种策略。然而,对于医学核保在多大程度上可能限制私人保险覆盖养老院护理的潜力,或者在这个相对较新的市场中使用的核保标准是否成功识别出高成本群体,人们知之甚少。本文利用全国死亡率跟踪调查的数据来回答这两个问题。我们估计,如果每个人都在65岁时申请私人长期护理保险,那么由于健康原因,12%至23%的人口会被拒绝。在75岁时,这些数字升至20%至31%。我们的模拟结果表明,长期护理保险核保标准识别出的个体对保险公司构成的财务风险差异很大。在大多数情况下,一个标准是否能识别出高成本群体对假设个体购买的保单很敏感。