Suppr超能文献

有创机械通气患者急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者驱动压与死亡率的相关性:系统评价和荟萃分析。

Association of Driving Pressure With Mortality Among Ventilated Patients With Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

机构信息

Interdepartmental Division of Critical Care Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.

Department of Anesthesia, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.

出版信息

Crit Care Med. 2018 Feb;46(2):300-306. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000002838.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

A recent post hoc analysis suggested that driving pressure may be more important than traditional ventilatory variables in determining outcome in mechanically ventilated patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to summarize the risk of mortality for higher versus lower driving pressure.

DATA SOURCES

MEDLINE, EMBASE, PubMed, CINAHL, and Cochrane CENTRAL from inception to February 10, 2017.

STUDY SELECTION

Studies including mechanically ventilated adult patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome, reporting driving pressure and mortality.

DATA EXTRACTION

Seven studies including five secondary analysis of previous randomized controlled trials and two observational studies (6,062 patients) were eligible for study. All studies were judged as having a low risk of bias. Median (interquartile range) driving pressure between higher and lower driving pressure groups was 15 cm H2O (14-16 cm H2O). Median (interquartile range) mortality of all included studies was 34% (32-38%).

DATA SYNTHESIS

In the meta-analyses of four studies (3,252 patients), higher driving pressure was associated with a significantly higher mortality (pooled risk ratio, 1.44; 95% [CI], 1.11-1.88; I = 85%). A sensitivity analysis restricted to the three studies with similar driving pressure cutoffs (13-15 cm H2O) demonstrated similar results (pooled risk ratio, 1.28; 95% CI, 1.14-1.43; I = 0%).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study confirmed an association between higher driving pressure and higher mortality in mechanically ventilated patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome. These findings suggest a possible range of driving pressure to be evaluated in clinical trials. Future research is needed to ascertain the benefit of ventilatory strategies targeting driving pressure in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome.

摘要

目的

最近的事后分析表明,在机械通气治疗急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者中,驱动压可能比传统通气变量更能决定预后。我们进行了一项系统评价和荟萃分析,以总结较高与较低驱动压与死亡率之间的关系。

资料来源

从建库到 2017 年 2 月 10 日,检索 MEDLINE、EMBASE、PubMed、CINAHL 和 Cochrane CENTRAL。

研究选择

纳入了机械通气治疗的急性呼吸窘迫综合征成年患者,报告了驱动压和死亡率。

资料提取

有 7 项研究(包括 5 项先前随机对照试验的二次分析和 2 项观察性研究)符合纳入标准,共纳入 6062 例患者。所有研究均被判定为低偏倚风险。较高与较低驱动压组之间的中位(四分位间距)驱动压为 15cmH2O(14-16cmH2O)。所有纳入研究的中位(四分位间距)死亡率为 34%(32-38%)。

资料综合

在 4 项研究(3252 例患者)的荟萃分析中,较高的驱动压与死亡率显著升高相关(合并风险比 1.44;95%CI 1.11-1.88;I = 85%)。敏感性分析限制于驱动压截断值相似的 3 项研究(13-15cmH2O),结果类似(合并风险比 1.28;95%CI 1.14-1.43;I = 0%)。

结论

本研究证实了机械通气治疗急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者中,较高的驱动压与较高的死亡率相关。这些发现提示在临床试验中可能需要评估一个驱动压范围。需要进一步研究以确定针对急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者的驱动压通气策略的获益。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验