Suppr超能文献

贝伐单抗在肿瘤治疗实践中的扩散:一项观察性研究。

Diffusion of Bevacizumab Across Oncology Practices: An Observational Study.

作者信息

Keating Nancy L, Huskamp Haiden A, Schrag Deborah, McWilliams John M, McNeil Barbara J, Landon Bruce E, Chernew Michael E, Normand Sharon-Lise T

机构信息

Department of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School.

Division of General Internal Medicine.

出版信息

Med Care. 2018 Jan;56(1):69-77. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000840.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Technological advances can improve care and outcomes but are a primary driver of health care spending growth. Understanding diffusion and use of new oncology therapies is important, given substantial increases in prices and spending on such treatments.

OBJECTIVES

Examine diffusion of bevacizumab, a novel (in 2004) and high-priced biologic cancer therapy, among US oncology practices during 2005-2012 and assess variation in use across practices.

RESEARCH DESIGN

Population-based observational study.

SETTING

A total of 2329 US practices providing cancer chemotherapy.

PARTICIPANTS

Random 20% sample of 236,304 Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries aged above 65 years in 2004-2012 undergoing infused chemotherapy for cancer.

MEASURES

Diffusion of bevacizumab (cumulative time to first use and 10% use) in practices, variation in use across practices overall and by higher versus lower-value use. We used hierarchical models with practice random effects to estimate the between-practice variation in the probability of receiving bevacizumab and to identify factors associated with use.

RESULTS

We observed relatively rapid diffusion of bevacizumab, particularly in independent practices and larger versus smaller practices. We observed substantial variation in use; the adjusted odds ratio (95% confidence interval) of bevacizumab use was 2.90 higher (2.73-3.08) for practices 1 SD above versus one standard deviation below the mean. Variation was less for higher-value [odds ratio=2.72 (2.56-2.89)] than lower-value uses [odds ratio=3.61 (3.21-4.06)].

CONCLUSIONS

Use of bevacizumab varied widely across oncology practices, particularly for lower-value indications. These findings suggest that interventions targeted to practices have potential for decreasing low-value use of high-cost cancer therapies.

摘要

背景

技术进步可改善医疗服务及结果,但也是医疗支出增长的主要推动因素。鉴于此类治疗的价格和支出大幅增加,了解新型肿瘤治疗方法的传播和使用情况很重要。

目的

研究2005 - 2012年期间贝伐单抗(一种2004年上市的新型高价生物癌症治疗药物)在美国肿瘤医疗实践中的传播情况,并评估各医疗实践中使用情况的差异。

研究设计

基于人群的观察性研究。

研究地点

美国2329家提供癌症化疗的医疗实践机构。

研究对象

2004 - 2012年期间年龄在65岁以上、接受癌症静脉化疗的236304名医疗保险按服务收费受益人的20%随机样本。

测量指标

贝伐单抗在各医疗实践中的传播情况(首次使用和10%使用率的累积时间),各医疗实践总体及高价值与低价值使用情况的使用差异。我们使用具有医疗实践随机效应的分层模型来估计接受贝伐单抗概率的医疗实践间差异,并确定与使用相关的因素。

结果

我们观察到贝伐单抗的传播相对较快,尤其是在独立医疗实践机构以及规模较大与较小的医疗实践机构中。我们观察到使用情况存在显著差异;与平均水平相差一个标准差以上的医疗实践机构使用贝伐单抗的调整优势比(95%置信区间)比低于平均水平一个标准差的机构高2.90倍(2.73 - 3.08)。高价值使用情况的差异[优势比 = 2.72(2.56 - 2.89)]小于低价值使用情况[优势比 = 3.61(3.21 - 4.06)]。

结论

贝伐单抗在肿瘤医疗实践中的使用差异很大,尤其是在低价值适应症方面。这些发现表明,针对医疗实践机构的干预措施有可能减少高成本癌症治疗的低价值使用情况。

相似文献

1
Diffusion of Bevacizumab Across Oncology Practices: An Observational Study.
Med Care. 2018 Jan;56(1):69-77. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000840.
2
Association of Physician Peer Influence With Subsequent Physician Adoption and Use of Bevacizumab.
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Jan 3;3(1):e1918586. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.18586.
3
Critical Lessons From High-Value Oncology Practices.
JAMA Oncol. 2018 Feb 1;4(2):164-171. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2017.3803.
6
Variation in Physician Spending and Association With Patient Outcomes.
JAMA Intern Med. 2017 May 1;177(5):675-682. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2017.0059.
9
Variation in prostate-specific antigen screening in men aged 80 and older in fee-for-service Medicare.
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2010 Apr;58(4):674-80. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2010.02761.x. Epub 2010 Mar 22.
10
Evaluation of Practice Patterns Among Oncologists Participating in the Oncology Care Model.
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 May 1;3(5):e205165. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.5165.

引用本文的文献

1
Off-Label Use of First-Line Immunotherapy for Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2025 Jun;23(3):102330. doi: 10.1016/j.clgc.2025.102330. Epub 2025 Mar 15.
2
Race and Ethnicity and Diffusion of Telemedicine in Medicaid for Schizophrenia Care After Onset of the COVID-19 Pandemic.
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Jan 2;8(1):e2454776. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.54776.
3
Commercial Versus Medicaid Insurance and Use of High-Priced Anticancer Treatments.
Oncologist. 2024 Jun 3;29(6):527-533. doi: 10.1093/oncolo/oyae035.
5
How are new drugs disseminated in Japan? Analysis using the National Database of Health Insurance Claims of Japan.
Cancer Sci. 2022 May;113(5):1771-1778. doi: 10.1111/cas.15322. Epub 2022 Mar 28.
7
Barriers and facilitators to the uptake of new medicines into clinical practice: a systematic review.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Nov 5;21(1):1198. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-07196-4.
8
Assessment of Second-Generation Diabetes Medication Initiation Among Medicare Enrollees From 2007 to 2015.
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 May 1;3(5):e205411. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.5411.
9
Association of Physician Peer Influence With Subsequent Physician Adoption and Use of Bevacizumab.
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Jan 3;3(1):e1918586. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.18586.
10
Adoption of immunotherapy in the community for patients diagnosed with metastatic melanoma.
J Immunother Cancer. 2019 Nov 7;7(1):289. doi: 10.1186/s40425-019-0782-y.

本文引用的文献

1
Trends in Antineoplastic Receipt after Medicare Payment Reform: Implications for Future Oncology Payment Design.
J Cancer Policy. 2018 Sep;17:51-58. doi: 10.1016/j.jcpo.2016.09.008. Epub 2016 Sep 28.
2
Payer View of High-Quality Clinical Pathways for Cancer.
J Oncol Pract. 2017 Mar;13(3):148-150. doi: 10.1200/JOP.2016.020503.
3
Updating the American Society of Clinical Oncology Value Framework: Revisions and Reflections in Response to Comments Received.
J Clin Oncol. 2016 Aug 20;34(24):2925-34. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2016.68.2518. Epub 2016 May 31.
4
Town and Gown Differences Among the 100 Largest Medical Groups in the United States.
Acad Med. 2016 Jul;91(7):1007-14. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000001240.
5
A Pathway Through the Bundle Jungle.
J Oncol Pract. 2016 Jun;12(6):504-9. doi: 10.1200/JOP.2015.008789. Epub 2016 May 12.
7
Technology Diffusion and Productivity Growth in Health Care.
Rev Econ Stat. 2015 Dec;97(5):951-964. doi: 10.1162/REST_a_00535. Epub 2015 Dec 8.
8
Association of Financial Integration Between Physicians and Hospitals With Commercial Health Care Prices.
JAMA Intern Med. 2015 Dec;175(12):1932-9. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.4610.
10
American Society of Clinical Oncology Statement: A Conceptual Framework to Assess the Value of Cancer Treatment Options.
J Clin Oncol. 2015 Aug 10;33(23):2563-77. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2015.61.6706. Epub 2015 Jun 22.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验