Medicine Optimisation Research Group, School of Pharmacy and Medical Sciences, University of Bradford, Richmond Road, Bradford, BD7 1DP, UK.
Medicine Management and Pharmacy Services, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Nov 5;21(1):1198. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-07196-4.
Implementation and uptake of novel and cost-effective medicines can improve patient health outcomes and healthcare efficiency. However, the uptake of new medicines into practice faces a wide range of obstacles. Earlier reviews provided insights into determinants for new medicine uptake (such as medicine, prescriber, patient, organization, and external environment factors). However, the methodological approaches used had limitations (e.g., single author, narrative review, narrow search, no quality assessment of reviewed evidence). This systematic review aims to identify barriers and facilitators affecting the uptake of new medicines into clinical practice and identify areas for future research.
A systematic search of literature was undertaken within seven databases: Medline, EMBASE, Web of Science, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, SCOPUS, and PsychINFO. Included in the review were qualitative, quantitative, and mixed-methods studies focused on adult participants (18 years and older) requiring or taking new medicine(s) for any condition, in the context of healthcare organizations and which identified factors affecting the uptake of new medicines. The methodological quality was assessed using QATSDD tool. A narrative synthesis of reported factors was conducted using framework analysis and a conceptual framework was utilised to group them.
A total of 66 studies were included. Most studies (n = 62) were quantitative and used secondary data (n = 46) from various databases, e.g., insurance databases. The identified factors had a varied impact on the uptake of the different studied new medicines. Differently from earlier reviews, patient factors (patient education, engagement with treatment, therapy preferences), cost of new medicine, reimbursement and formulary conditions, and guidelines were suggested to influence the uptake. Also, the review highlighted that health economics, wider organizational factors, and underlying behaviours of adopters were not or under explored.
This systematic review has identified a broad range of factors affecting the uptake of new medicines within healthcare organizations, which were grouped into patient, prescriber, medicine, organizational, and external environment factors. This systematic review also identifies additional factors affecting new medicine use not reported in earlier reviews, which included patient influence and education level, cost of new medicines, formulary and reimbursement restrictions, and guidelines.
PROSPERO database (CRD42018108536).
新型、具有成本效益的药物的应用和推广可以改善患者的健康结果和医疗效率。然而,新药物在实践中的应用面临着广泛的障碍。早期的综述提供了新药物采用的决定因素的见解(如药物、处方者、患者、组织和外部环境因素)。然而,所使用的方法学方法存在局限性(例如,单一作者、叙述性综述、搜索范围狭窄、未对综述证据进行质量评估)。本系统评价旨在确定影响新药物临床应用的障碍和促进因素,并确定未来研究的领域。
在七个数据库中进行了文献系统搜索:Medline、EMBASE、Web of Science、CINAHL、Cochrane 图书馆、SCOPUS 和 PsychINFO。本综述纳入了关注成人参与者(18 岁及以上)的定性、定量和混合方法研究,这些参与者需要或正在服用任何疾病的新药物,并在医疗保健组织的背景下确定了影响新药物采用的因素。使用 QATSDD 工具评估方法学质量。使用框架分析对报告的因素进行了叙述性综合,并使用概念框架对其进行了分组。
共纳入 66 项研究。大多数研究(n=62)为定量研究,使用了来自各种数据库(如保险数据库)的二次数据(n=46)。所确定的因素对不同研究的新药物的采用有不同的影响。与早期的综述不同,患者因素(患者教育、参与治疗、治疗偏好)、新药的成本、报销和处方条件以及指南被认为会影响采用。此外,该综述还强调,健康经济学、更广泛的组织因素以及采用者的潜在行为没有得到或没有得到充分探索。
本系统评价确定了影响医疗保健组织内新药物采用的广泛因素,并将其分为患者、处方者、药物、组织和外部环境因素。本系统评价还确定了早期综述中未报告的影响新药物使用的其他因素,包括患者的影响和教育水平、新药的成本、处方和报销限制以及指南。
PROSPERO 数据库(CRD42018108536)。