Monk Rebecca L, Qureshi Adam W, McNeill Adam, Erskine-Shaw Marianne, Heim Derek
Department of Psychology, Edge Hill University, St Helens Rd, Ormskirk L39 4QP, UK.
Alcohol Alcohol. 2018 May 1;53(3):228-234. doi: 10.1093/alcalc/agx084.
To implement a modified bogus taste test (BTT) and to examine the interactive effects of environmental and social contexts on levels of 'alcohol' consumption.
University students (Study 1 n = 38, Study 2 n = 80), recruited via opportunity sampling, completed a modified BTT under the pretence of assessing garnish preference for gin and tonic. All participants were tested alone or as part of an existing friendship group. In Study 1 participants were in a laboratory setting but were exposed to different contextual cues (alcohol-related or neutral) by way of posters displayed on the walls. In Study 2, participants assessed the drinks in either a pub or a library setting.
In Study 1 participants tested in a group consumed significantly more when exposed to pub-related stimuli in contrast to those who were exposed to library-related stimuli. Participants who were alone and exposed to library-related cues consumed significantly more than those in a group and exposed to these cues. In Study 2, as in Study 1, participants tested in a group condition consumed significantly more of what they believed to be alcohol when in the pub compared to those who were tested in the library. Higher group consumption was also evident in the library condition, although the size of this difference was not as large as in the pub testing condition.
In the absence of any pharmacological effects of alcohol, social and environmental context have an interactive impact on shaping consumption.
实施一种改良的假味觉测试(BTT),并研究环境和社会背景对“酒精”消费水平的交互作用。
通过机会抽样招募大学生(研究1中n = 38,研究2中n = 80),在评估对杜松子酒和奎宁水装饰偏好的幌子下完成改良的BTT。所有参与者单独接受测试或作为现有友谊团体的一部分接受测试。在研究1中,参与者处于实验室环境,但通过墙上展示的海报接触不同的情境线索(与酒精相关或中性)。在研究2中,参与者在酒吧或图书馆环境中评估饮品。
在研究1中,与接触图书馆相关刺激的参与者相比,在团体中接受测试且接触酒吧相关刺激的参与者消费显著更多。单独接受测试且接触图书馆相关线索的参与者比团体中接触这些线索的参与者消费显著更多。在研究2中,与研究1一样,与在图书馆接受测试的参与者相比,在团体条件下接受测试的参与者在酒吧中认为是酒精的饮品消费显著更多。在图书馆环境中团体消费也更高,尽管这种差异的幅度不如在酒吧测试环境中那么大。
在没有酒精任何药理作用的情况下,社会和环境背景对消费形成具有交互影响。