Li Dongyang, Lv Hang, Hao Xuanyu, Dong Yudi, Dai Huixu, Song Yongsheng
Department of Urology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning 110004, P.R. China.
Department of Urology, Liaoning Cancer Hospital and Institute, Cancer Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning 110042, P.R. China.
Oncotarget. 2017 Jul 29;8(48):84449-84458. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.19680. eCollection 2017 Oct 13.
The prognostic value of the bone scan index (BSI) in metastatic prostate cancer (mPCa) remained controversial. Therefore, we performed a meta-analysis to determine the predictive value of BSI and survival in patients with mPCa.
A literature search was performed in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and Cochrane library databases. Hazard ratios (HRs), concordance indices (C-indices) were extracted to estimate the relationship between BSI and survival in patients with mPCa. Subgroup analyses were conducted on different types of mPCa, ethnics, cut-off values and sample sizes.
14 high quality studies involving 1295 patients with mPCa were included in this meta-analysis. The pooled results indicated that high basline BSI and elevated BSI change on treatment (ΔBSI) were significantly predictive of poor overall survial (HR = 1.29, < 0.001; HR = 1.27, < 0.001, respectively). Baseline BSI was also significantly related to cancer specific survival (HR = 1.65, = 0.019) and prostate specific antigen recurrence survival (HR = 2.26, < 0.001). Subgroup analysis supported main results. Moreover, BSI could increase the C-indices of predictive models.
Baseline BSI and ΔBSI may be beneficial to mPCa prognosis in clinical monitor and treatment. Further high quality studies with larger sample size are required in the future.
骨扫描指数(BSI)在转移性前列腺癌(mPCa)中的预后价值仍存在争议。因此,我们进行了一项荟萃分析,以确定BSI对mPCa患者的预测价值及生存率。
在PubMed、Embase、Web of Science和Cochrane图书馆数据库中进行文献检索。提取风险比(HRs)、一致性指数(C指数),以评估BSI与mPCa患者生存率之间的关系。对不同类型的mPCa、种族、临界值和样本量进行亚组分析。
本荟萃分析纳入了14项高质量研究,共1295例mPCa患者。汇总结果表明,高基线BSI和治疗期间BSI升高变化(ΔBSI)显著预测总体生存率较差(HR分别为1.29,P<0.001;HR为1.27,P<0.001)。基线BSI也与癌症特异性生存率(HR = 1.65,P = 0.019)和前列腺特异性抗原复发生存率(HR = 2.26,P<0.001)显著相关。亚组分析支持主要结果。此外,BSI可提高预测模型的C指数。
基线BSI和ΔBSI在临床监测和治疗中可能有助于mPCa的预后判断。未来需要开展样本量更大的高质量研究。