Kwon Won Joo, Ko Joo Yeon, Ro Young Suck, Kim Myung Hwa, Kim Byung Soo, Kim Hye One, Nam Jae Hui, Lee Ga-Young, Park Mi Youn, Son Sang Wook, Yang Jun Mo, Lee Dong Hun, Lee Ai Young, Lee Jun Young, Chang Sung Eun, Choi Hae Young, Park Eun Joo
Department of Dermatology, Hallym University Sacred Heart Hospital, Anyang, Korea.
Department of Dermatology, Hanyang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Eur J Dermatol. 2017 Dec 1;27(6):573-578. doi: 10.1684/ejd.2017.3139.
A comparison between responses to allergens based on the TRUE Test(TT) and IQ Chamber (IQC) in Europeans has been previously reported, however, no such study has been performed in Asians. To compare allergen responses using the TT and IQC (using the Korean standard series) in order to gather more information regarding the positive response rates for each allergen and the clinical value of IQC. Suspected contact dermatitis patients were enrolled and tested with 18 allergens using the TT and IQC. The test was performed in 214 patients. Simultaneous positive results for both tests were recorded in 242 cases (positive concordance rate: 66.7%). IQC yielded more positive results. Allergens with a high positive concordance rate were nickel sulphate (82.1%), thimerosal (78.6%), and p-phenylenediamine (73.3%). IQC mostly showed similar or higher positive rates than TT, with high concordance. We recommend the IQC method as a screening test in patients with suspected contact dermatitis. To compensate for possible false positive results, careful history taking and a different patch test should be performed when appropriate.
此前已有关于欧洲人基于TRUE测试(TT)和IQ测试箱(IQC)对过敏原反应的比较报道,然而,尚未在亚洲人身上进行过此类研究。为了收集更多关于每种过敏原阳性反应率和IQC临床价值的信息,比较使用TT和IQC(采用韩国标准系列)对过敏原的反应。纳入疑似接触性皮炎患者,使用TT和IQC对18种过敏原进行检测。对214例患者进行了检测。两种测试同时呈阳性结果的有242例(阳性一致率:66.7%)。IQC产生的阳性结果更多。阳性一致率高的过敏原是硫酸镍(82.1%)、硫柳汞(78.6%)和对苯二胺(73.3%)。IQC大多显示出与TT相似或更高的阳性率,且一致性高。我们建议将IQC方法作为疑似接触性皮炎患者的筛查测试。为弥补可能出现的假阳性结果,应在适当的时候仔细询问病史并进行不同的斑贴试验。