Suppr超能文献

双侧植入衍射三焦点人工晶状体与将扩展景深人工晶状体与衍射双焦点人工晶状体混合植入后的视觉效果比较。

Comparison of visual outcomes after bilateral implantation of a diffractive trifocal intraocular lens and blended implantation of an extended depth of focus intraocular lens with a diffractive bifocal intraocular lens.

作者信息

de Medeiros André Lins, de Araújo Rolim André Gustavo, Motta Antonio Francisco Pimenta, Ventura Bruna Vieira, Vilar César, Chaves Mário Augusto Pereira Dias, Carricondo Pedro Carlos, Hida Wilson Takashi

机构信息

Cataract Department, Hospital Oftalmológico de Brasília.

Cataract Department, Centro de Estudos Oftalmológicos Renato Ambrósio, Brasília.

出版信息

Clin Ophthalmol. 2017 Oct 26;11:1911-1916. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S145945. eCollection 2017.

Abstract

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to compare the visual outcomes and subjective visual quality between bilateral implantation of a diffractive trifocal intraocular lens, Alcon Acrysof IQ PanOptix TNFT00 (group A), and blended implantation of an extended depth of focus lens, J&J Tecnis Symfony ZXR00 with a diffractive bifocal intraocular lens, J&J Vision Tecnis ZMB00 (group B).

METHODS

This prospective, nonrandomized, consecutive, comparative study included the assessment of 40 eyes in 20 patients implanted with multifocal intraocular lens. Exclusion criteria were existence of any corneal, retina, or optic nerve disease, previous eye surgery, illiteracy, previous refractive surgery, high axial myopia, expected postoperative corneal astigmatism of >1.00 cylindrical diopter (D), and intraoperative or postoperative complications. Binocular visual acuity was tested in all cases. Ophthalmological evaluation included the measurement of uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), uncorrected near visual acuity (UNVA), and uncorrected intermediate visual acuity (UIVA), with the analysis of contrast sensitivity (CS), and visual defocus curve.

RESULTS

Postoperative UDVA was 0.01 and -0.096 logMAR (<0.01) in groups A and B, respectively; postoperative CDVA was -0.07 and -0.16 logMAR (<0.01) in groups A and B, respectively; UIVA was 0.14 and 0.20 logMAR (<0.01) in groups A and B, respectively; UNVA was -0.03 and 0.11 logMAR (<0.01) in groups A and B, respectively. Under photopic conditions group B had better CS at low frequencies with and without glare.

CONCLUSION

Both groups promoted good quality of vision for long, intermediate, and short distances. Group B exhibited a better performance for very short distances and for intermediate and long distances ≥-1.50 D of vergence. Group A exhibited a better performance for UIVA at 60 cm and for UNVA at 40 cm.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在比较双侧植入衍射三焦点人工晶状体爱尔康Acrysof IQ PanOptix TNFT00(A组)与将扩展景深晶状体强生Tecnis Symfony ZXR00与衍射双焦点人工晶状体强生眼力健Tecnis ZMB00混合植入(B组)后的视觉效果和主观视觉质量。

方法

这项前瞻性、非随机、连续的对照研究纳入了20例植入多焦点人工晶状体的患者的40只眼。排除标准包括存在任何角膜、视网膜或视神经疾病、既往眼部手术史、文盲、既往屈光手术史、高度轴性近视、预计术后角膜散光>1.00柱镜度(D)以及术中或术后并发症。所有病例均进行双眼视力测试。眼科评估包括测量未矫正远视力(UDVA)、矫正远视力(CDVA)、未矫正近视力(UNVA)和未矫正中视力(UIVA),并分析对比敏感度(CS)和视觉离焦曲线。

结果

A组和B组术后UDVA分别为0.01和-0.096 logMAR(<0.01);A组和B组术后CDVA分别为-0.07和-0.16 logMAR(<0.01);A组和B组UIVA分别为0.14和0.20 logMAR(<0.01);A组和B组UNVA分别为-0.03和0.11 logMAR(<0.01)。在明视条件下,B组在有无眩光的低频情况下CS更好。

结论

两组均能在远、中、近距离促进良好的视觉质量。B组在极近距离以及聚散度≥-1.50 D的中、远距离表现更佳。A组在60 cm处的UIVA和40 cm处的UNVA表现更佳。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8cd1/5667791/2dad85eca418/opth-11-1911Fig1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验