Suppr超能文献

双眼植入衍射三焦点人工晶状体与扩展景深人工晶状体的视觉效果比较评估。

Comparative Evaluation of Visual Outcomes After Bilateral Implantation of a Diffractive Trifocal Intraocular Lens and an Extended Depth of Focus Intraocular Lens.

机构信息

Bharti Eye Foundation and Hospital, New Delhi, India.

出版信息

Eye Contact Lens. 2020 Sep;46(5):314-318. doi: 10.1097/ICL.0000000000000637.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To compare visual outcomes and clinical performance of diffractive trifocal and extended depth of focus (EDOF) intraocular lenses (IOLs).

METHODS

This prospective, consecutive, nonrandomized, comparative study of 6-month duration included assessment of 160 eyes of 80 patients (40 patients in each group). The patients had bilateral cataract surgery with implantation of a trifocal (FineVision Micro F; PhysIOL SA, Liège, Belgium) or EDOF IOL (TECNIS Symfony; Abbott Medical Optics, Inc., Abbott Park, IL) in both eyes. Ophthalmological evaluation included measurement of monocular uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) and corrected distance VA (CDVA), uncorrected intermediate VA (UIVA) and distance-corrected intermediate VA (DCIVA), uncorrected near VA (UNVA) and distance-corrected near VA (DCNVA). Analysis of point-spread function and modulation transfer function was also performed postoperatively, and quality of vision and spectacle-dependence questionnaires were assessed.

RESULTS

There was no statistically significant difference between groups in monocular UDVA (P=0.65), CDVA (P=0.82), and binocular UDVA (P=0.81). The monocular UIVA, monocular DCIVA, and binocular UIVA were also comparable among the two groups (P=0.70, 0.74, and 0.81, respectively). Monocular UNVA, DCNVA, and binocular UNVA were statistically and significantly better for the trifocal group than for the EDOF (P=0.01, P=0.009, and P=0.001, respectively). There were no differences in visual symptoms and quality among groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Trifocal IOL had a clear advantage over EDOF IOLs in near VA, while both IOLs showed excellent performance in distance and intermediate VA. Both IOLs provided high percentage of spectacle independence and patient satisfaction with minimal level of disturbing photic phenomena.

摘要

目的

比较衍射三焦点和扩展景深(EDOF)人工晶状体(IOL)的视觉效果和临床性能。

方法

本前瞻性、连续、非随机、对照研究为期 6 个月,纳入 80 例患者(每组 40 例)的 160 只眼。患者双眼均行白内障手术,并植入三焦点(FineVision Micro F;PhysIOL SA,Liège,比利时)或 EDOF IOL(TECNIS Symfony;Abbott Medical Optics,Inc.,Abbott Park,IL)。眼科评估包括单眼未矫正远视力(UDVA)和矫正远视力(CDVA)、未矫正中间视力(UIVA)和距离矫正中间视力(DCIVA)、未矫正近视力(UNVA)和距离矫正近视力(DCNVA)的测量。术后还进行了点扩散函数和调制传递函数分析,并评估了视觉质量和眼镜依赖问卷。

结果

两组患者单眼 UDVA(P=0.65)、CDVA(P=0.82)和双眼 UDVA(P=0.81)差异均无统计学意义。两组间单眼 UIVA、单眼 DCIVA 和双眼 UIVA 也无差异(P=0.70、0.74 和 0.81)。三焦点组的单眼 UNVA、DCNVA 和双眼 UNVA 均显著优于 EDOF 组(P=0.01、P=0.009 和 P=0.001)。两组间视觉症状和质量无差异。

结论

三焦点 IOL 在近视力方面明显优于 EDOF IOL,而两种 IOL 在远距和中距视力方面均表现出优异的性能。两种 IOL 都提供了高比例的不依赖眼镜和患者满意度,同时最小化了恼人的光觉现象。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验