• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

三焦点与扩展景深人工晶状体在中国白内障患者中的临床结果:一项前瞻性队列研究。

Clinical Outcomes of a Trifocal Versus an Extended Depth of Field Intraocular Lens in Chinese Patients With Cataract: A Prospective Cohort Study.

作者信息

Chen Qingzhong, Zhang Guangbin

机构信息

Xiamen Eye Center and Eye Institute of Xiamen University, Xiamen, China.

Xiamen Clinical Research Center for Eye Diseases, Xiamen, Fujian, China.

出版信息

J Ophthalmol. 2024 Oct 15;2024:5571802. doi: 10.1155/2024/5571802. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.1155/2024/5571802
PMID:39444423
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11496590/
Abstract

To compare the standard outcomes between the PanOptix and Symfony multifocal intraocular lenses (MIOLs) in Chinese patients. This prospective observational cohort study enrolled patients with cataracts between April 2021 and December 2021 at Xiamen Eye Center Affiliated to Xiamen University. The patients were grouped in the PanOptix (TIOL group) and Symfony (EDF group) according to the IOLs implanted. Uncorrected distant, corrected distance, binocular uncorrected intermediate, and near visual acuity (UNVA), distance-corrected intermediate and near VA (DCNVA) , defocus curve, spectacle independence, contrast sensitivity (CS), and visual disturbances were evaluated after 3 months. Forty patients (80 eyes) were enrolled in the study (20/group). Three months after the operation, UNVA (0.13 ± 0.16) and DCNVA (0.08 ± 0.08) were better in the TIOL group than in the EDF group (0.22 ± 0.08 and 0.22 ± 0.08, respectively, =0.003 and < 0.001, respectively). The TIOL group achieved a better-than-0.15-logMAR VA from +0.5 D to -2.5 D (40 cm). VAs of the TIOL group from -1 D (100 cm) to -4 D (25 cm) were better than in the EDF group ( < 0.05). There were no significant differences in the intermediate and far vision outcomes ( > 0.05). Total near-vision spectacle independence was higher in the TIOL group (80%) than in the EDF group (50%) (=0.039). Compared with EDF, TIOL leads to better near-vision outcomes without significant differences for intermediate and distant vision outcomes. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: ChiCTR2100044558.

摘要

比较中国患者中PanOptix和Symfony多焦点人工晶状体(MIOLs)的标准结局。这项前瞻性观察性队列研究纳入了2021年4月至2021年12月在厦门大学附属厦门眼科中心就诊的白内障患者。根据植入的人工晶状体,将患者分为PanOptix组(TIOL组)和Symfony组(EDF组)。术后3个月评估未矫正远视力、矫正远视力、双眼未矫正中视力和近视力(UNVA)、距离矫正中视力和近视力(DCNVA)、散焦曲线、眼镜独立性、对比敏感度(CS)和视觉干扰。40例患者(80只眼)纳入研究(每组20例)。术后3个月,TIOL组的UNVA(0.13±0.16)和DCNVA(0.08±0.08)优于EDF组(分别为0.22±0.08和0.22±0.08,P分别为0.003和<0.001)。TIOL组在+0.5 D至-2.5 D(40 cm)时达到优于0.15 logMAR的视力。TIOL组从-1 D(100 cm)至-4 D(25 cm)的视力优于EDF组(P<0.05)。中视力和远视力结局无显著差异(P>0.05)。TIOL组的总近视力眼镜独立性(80%)高于EDF组(50%)(P=0.039)。与EDF相比,TIOL可带来更好的近视力结局,而中视力和远视力结局无显著差异。ClinicalTrials.gov标识符:ChiCTR2100044558。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/90b3/11496590/30f3154f6256/JOPH2024-5571802.002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/90b3/11496590/f38b5fa76ae6/JOPH2024-5571802.001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/90b3/11496590/30f3154f6256/JOPH2024-5571802.002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/90b3/11496590/f38b5fa76ae6/JOPH2024-5571802.001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/90b3/11496590/30f3154f6256/JOPH2024-5571802.002.jpg

相似文献

1
Clinical Outcomes of a Trifocal Versus an Extended Depth of Field Intraocular Lens in Chinese Patients With Cataract: A Prospective Cohort Study.三焦点与扩展景深人工晶状体在中国白内障患者中的临床结果:一项前瞻性队列研究。
J Ophthalmol. 2024 Oct 15;2024:5571802. doi: 10.1155/2024/5571802. eCollection 2024.
2
Trifocal versus extended depth of focus (EDOF) intraocular lenses after cataract extraction.白内障摘除术后三焦点与扩展景深(EDOF)人工晶状体的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Jul 10;7(7):CD014891. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014891.pub2.
3
A comparative study of the visual outcomes between a new trifocal and an extended depth of focus intraocular lens.新型三焦点人工晶状体与扩展景深人工晶状体视觉效果的比较研究
Eur J Ophthalmol. 2018 Mar;28(2):182-187. doi: 10.5301/ejo.5001029. Epub 2017 Aug 9.
4
Trifocal intraocular lenses versus bifocal intraocular lenses after cataract extraction among participants with presbyopia.老花眼患者白内障摘除术后三焦点人工晶状体与双焦点人工晶状体的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Jun 18;6(6):CD012648. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012648.pub2.
5
Comparison between bilateral implantation of a trifocal intraocular lens (Alcon Acrysof IQ® PanOptix) and extended depth of focus lens (Tecnis® Symfony® ZXR00 lens).三焦点人工晶状体(爱尔康 Acrysof IQ® PanOptix)与扩展景深人工晶状体(Tecnis® Symfony® ZXR00 晶状体)双侧植入的比较。
Int Ophthalmol. 2021 Feb;41(2):567-573. doi: 10.1007/s10792-020-01608-w. Epub 2020 Oct 10.
6
Trifocal intraocular lenses versus bifocal intraocular lenses after cataract extraction among participants with presbyopia.多焦点人工晶状体与白内障摘除术后老视患者的双焦点人工晶状体比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Jan 27;1(1):CD012648. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012648.pub3.
7
Visual satisfaction and spectacle independence with monofocal intraocular lens with enhanced intermediate vision and trifocal intraocular lenses in the prepresbyopic age group patients with cataracts.在白内障前期老花眼年龄组患者中,单焦点人工晶状体增强中视力以及三焦点人工晶状体的视觉满意度和眼镜独立性。
Oman J Ophthalmol. 2023 Oct 18;16(3):482-488. doi: 10.4103/ojo.ojo_167_22. eCollection 2023 Sep-Dec.
8
Comparison of visual outcomes after implantation of AtLisa tri 839 MP and Symfony intraocular lenses.AtLisa tri 839 MP 与 Symfony 人工晶状体植入术后的视觉效果比较。
Int Ophthalmol. 2020 Oct;40(10):2553-2562. doi: 10.1007/s10792-020-01435-z. Epub 2020 Jun 2.
9
Clinical Outcomes after Bilateral Implantation of Trifocal Diffractive Intraocular Lenses and Extended Depth of Focus Intraocular Lenses.双焦点衍射人工晶状体和扩展焦深人工晶状体双侧植入后的临床结果
J Clin Med. 2022 Sep 27;11(19):5729. doi: 10.3390/jcm11195729.
10
Comparative analysis of visual outcomes, reading skills, contrast sensitivity, and patient satisfaction with two models of trifocal diffractive intraocular lenses and an extended range of vision intraocular lens.两种三焦点衍射人工晶状体和一种扩展视力范围人工晶状体在视觉效果、阅读技能、对比敏感度及患者满意度方面的比较分析
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2018 Oct;256(10):1913-1922. doi: 10.1007/s00417-018-4052-3. Epub 2018 Jul 6.

本文引用的文献

1
Screening of positive dysphotopsia before multifocal intraocular lens implantation.多焦点人工晶状体植入术前阳性像差的筛查。
Indian J Ophthalmol. 2024 Feb 1;72(Suppl 2):S211-S217. doi: 10.4103/IJO.IJO_1038_23. Epub 2024 Jan 25.
2
Objective cataract grading methods and expected contrast sensitivity reestablishment with multifocal intraocular lenses.目的白内障分级方法和多焦点人工晶状体预期对比度敏感度的重建。
Int Ophthalmol. 2023 Aug;43(8):2825-2832. doi: 10.1007/s10792-023-02680-8. Epub 2023 Mar 4.
3
Comparative Visual Outcome Analysis of a Diffractive Multifocal Intraocular Lens and a New Diffractive Multifocal Lens with Extended Depth of Focus.
衍射多焦点人工晶状体与新型扩展焦深衍射多焦点晶状体的视觉效果对比分析
J Clin Med. 2022 Dec 12;11(24):7374. doi: 10.3390/jcm11247374.
4
Evaluation of Refractive Accuracy of ORA and the Factors Impacting Residual Astigmatism in Patients Implanted with Trifocal IOLs During Cataract Surgery: A Retrospective Observational Study.白内障手术中植入三焦点人工晶状体患者ORA屈光准确性及影响残余散光因素的评估:一项回顾性观察研究
Clin Ophthalmol. 2022 Aug 10;16:2491-2503. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S371555. eCollection 2022.
5
Patients' dissatisfaction with multifocal intraocular lenses managed by exchange with other multifocal lenses of different optical profiles.患者对通过更换为其他具有不同光学轮廓的多焦点人工晶状体来处理多焦点人工晶状体的方式不满意。
Eye Vis (Lond). 2022 Mar 1;9(1):8. doi: 10.1186/s40662-022-00280-8.
6
Development and Validation of a Visual Symptom-Specific Patient-Reported Outcomes Instrument for Adults With Cataract Intraocular Lens Implants.成人白内障人工晶状体植入视觉症状特异性患者报告结局工具的开发与验证
Am J Ophthalmol. 2022 May;237:91-103. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2021.10.023. Epub 2021 Nov 3.
7
The Effect of Age, Postoperative Refraction, and Pre- and Postoperative Pupil Size on Halo Size and Intensity in Eyes Implanted with a Trifocal or Extended Depth-of-Focus Lens.年龄、术后屈光状态以及术前和术后瞳孔大小对植入三焦点或扩展景深人工晶状体眼的光晕大小和强度的影响
Clin Ophthalmol. 2021 Oct 14;15:4141-4152. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S327660. eCollection 2021.
8
Comparison of the Visual Outcomes of an Extended Depth-of-Focus Lens and a Trifocal Lens.扩展景深人工晶状体与三焦点人工晶状体视觉效果的比较。
Clin Ophthalmol. 2021 Jul 16;15:3051-3063. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S321779. eCollection 2021.
9
Comparison of an aspheric monofocal intraocular lens with the new generation monofocal lens using defocus curve.比较非球面单焦点人工晶状体与新一代单焦点人工晶状体的离焦曲线。
Indian J Ophthalmol. 2020 Dec;68(12):3025-3029. doi: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_985_20.
10
Comparative analysis of objective and subjective outcomes of two different intraocular lenses: trifocal and extended range of vision.两种不同人工晶状体的客观和主观结果比较分析:三焦点和扩展视力范围人工晶状体
BMJ Open Ophthalmol. 2020 Oct 14;5(1):e000497. doi: 10.1136/bmjophth-2020-000497. eCollection 2020.