Liang Jing-Li, Tian Fang, Zhang Hong, Teng He
Tianjin Medical University Eye Hospital, Tianjin 300384, China.
Int J Ophthalmol. 2016 Dec 18;9(12):1766-1771. doi: 10.18240/ijo.2016.12.11. eCollection 2016.
To assess the binocular visual function in bilateral cataract patients with unilateral astigmatism after combined implantations of Toric with multifocal intraocular lens (IOL), and to compare with that of Toric and monofocal IOL implantation.
All the 30 patients with unilateral astigmatism suffered bilateral cataract were randomly divided into two groups: Toric plus multifocal IOL group and Toric plus monofocal IOL group. Uncorrected and corrected visual acuity at distance (5.0 m), intermediate distance (0.6 m), and near (0.33 m), contrast sensitivity, and stereopsis were assessed 6mo after surgery. Patients were also surveyed for visual disturbances and spectacle dependence.
Binocular uncorrected visual acuity (LogMAR) of Toric/multifocal IOL eyes at distance, intermediate, near were 0.05±0.05, 0.24±0.10, and 0.14±0.06 respectively. The values of Toric plus monofocal IOL eyes were 0.06±0.07, 0.26±0.08, and 0.37±0.10 respectively. These values did not indicate significant differences between two groups with exception of near visual acuity. In the photopic condition (with or without glare), the contrast sensitivity of multifocal IOL eyes was significant lower than the monofocal IOL eyes in 18 cpd. In the mesopic condition, the contrast sensitivity of multifocal group was significant lower than monofocal group in 12 cpd, and in mesopic glare condition, this significant difference was found both in 6 cpd and 12 cpd. The stereopsis of Toric/multifocal IOL eyes decreased slightly (100±80 seconds of arc, =2.222, =0.136). Mean near vision for patient satisfaction was statistically significantly higher in Toric/multifocal IOL group patients versus than that in Toric/monofocal IOL group (80% 25.5%, =0.000). Visual disturbance was not noticed in either group.
Although the combination of Toric and multifocal IOL implantation results in compromising stereoacuity, it can still provide patients with high levels of spectacle freedom and good overall binocular visual acuity.
评估在植入散光人工晶状体(IOL)联合多焦点人工晶状体后,双侧白内障合并单眼散光患者的双眼视觉功能,并与植入散光人工晶状体和单焦点人工晶状体的情况进行比较。
将30例双侧白内障合并单眼散光患者随机分为两组:散光联合多焦点人工晶状体组和散光联合单焦点人工晶状体组。术后6个月评估远距离(5.0米)、中距离(0.6米)和近距离(0.33米)的未矫正和矫正视力、对比敏感度和立体视。还对患者的视觉干扰和眼镜依赖情况进行了调查。
散光/多焦点人工晶状体眼在远距离、中距离、近距离的双眼未矫正视力(LogMAR)分别为0.05±0.05、0.24±0.10和0.14±0.06。散光联合单焦点人工晶状体眼的值分别为0.06±0.07、0.26±0.08和0.37±0.10。除了近距离视力外,两组之间这些值没有显著差异。在明视条件下(有或无眩光),多焦点人工晶状体眼在18周/度时的对比敏感度显著低于单焦点人工晶状体眼。在中间视觉条件下,多焦点组在12周/度时的对比敏感度显著低于单焦点组,在中间视觉眩光条件下,在6周/度和12周/度时均发现了显著差异。散光/多焦点人工晶状体眼的立体视略有下降(100±80角秒,=2.222,=0.136)。散光/多焦点人工晶状体组患者对近距离视力的平均满意度在统计学上显著高于散光/单焦点人工晶状体组(80% 25.5%,=0.000)。两组均未发现视觉干扰。
虽然植入散光人工晶状体联合多焦点人工晶状体会导致立体视锐度下降,但仍可为患者提供高水平的无眼镜自由度和良好的总体双眼视力。