Suppr超能文献

超声评估肘窝静脉穿刺部位的安全性。

Safety of Venipuncture Sites at the Cubital Fossa as Assessed by Ultrasonography.

机构信息

From the Department of Nursing Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, Institute of Medical, Pharmaceutical and Health Sciences.

Department of Clinical Nursing, Graduate Course of Nursing Science, Division of Health Sciences, Graduate School of Medical Sciences.

出版信息

J Patient Saf. 2020 Mar;16(1):98-105. doi: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000000441.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the present observational study was to identify safe and suitable venipuncture sites for nursing in the clinical setting using ultrasonography to measure the depth and cross-sectional area of each superficial vein before and after tourniquet application as well as the distance between each superficial vein and the median nerve or brachial artery.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Twenty healthy volunteers (21.8 [0.6] y) were recruited. The visible rate of each superficial vein before and after tourniquet application was 65% for the basilic vein, 90% to 95% for the median cubital vein, and 65% to 80% for the cephalic vein. The cross-sectional area of the median cubital vein after tourniquet application was significantly larger than that of the basilic vein and cephalic vein. The distance between the basilic vein or median cubital vein and median nerve was significantly smaller than that between the cephalic vein and median nerve. The distance between the basilic vein or median cubital vein and brachial artery was significantly smaller than that between the cephalic vein and brachial artery.

CONCLUSIONS

These results demonstrated that the cephalic vein at the cubital fossa is a relatively safe venipuncture site because of its distance from the median nerve and brachial artery. When puncturing the cephalic vein is difficult because it is not visible, the median cubital vein at the cubital fossa may be selected for venipuncture due to its cross-sectional area and visibility; however, care is needed to avoid penetrating the vein because the median nerve and brachial artery are located underneath.

摘要

目的

本观察性研究旨在使用超声测量止血带应用前后每条浅静脉的深度和横截面积以及每条浅静脉与正中神经或肱动脉之间的距离,从而确定临床环境中安全且合适的静脉穿刺部位。

方法和结果

共招募了 20 名健康志愿者(21.8[0.6]岁)。止血带应用前后每条浅静脉的可见率分别为:贵要静脉 65%,肘正中静脉 90%95%,头静脉 65%80%。止血带应用后头静脉的横截面积明显大于贵要静脉和头静脉。贵要静脉或肘正中静脉与正中神经之间的距离明显小于头静脉与正中神经之间的距离。贵要静脉或肘正中静脉与肱动脉之间的距离明显小于头静脉与肱动脉之间的距离。

结论

这些结果表明,由于头静脉与正中神经和肱动脉的距离较远,因此肘窝的头静脉是相对安全的静脉穿刺部位。当头静脉因不可见而难以穿刺时,可以选择肘窝的肘正中静脉进行静脉穿刺,因为它的横截面积和可见性较大;但是,需要小心避免刺穿静脉,因为正中神经和肱动脉就在其下方。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ba15/7046143/175df95e7e91/pts-16-098-g002.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验