Suppr超能文献

提高静脉采血程序(静脉穿刺术)的质量:避免使用止血带。

Improving the Quality of Venous Blood Sampling Procedure (Phlebotomy): Avoiding Tourniquet Use.

作者信息

Freitas Francisco, Alves Mónica

机构信息

Microbiology Laboratory, Clinical Pathology Service, Centro Hospitalar Tondela-Viseu, Viseu, Portugal.

Central Laboratory, Clinical Pathology Service, Centro Hospitalar Tondela-Viseu, Viseu, Portugal.

出版信息

J Lab Physicians. 2021 Sep 22;14(2):218-222. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1735584. eCollection 2022 Jun.

Abstract

Phlebotomy guidelines discourage tourniquet use whenever possible. We assessed phlebotomists' capability of not using the tourniquet in venous blood sampling, hypothesizing it to be equal to 50% of the patients attended, and identifying the most frequent venipuncture site.  We assigned two phlebotomists of the same age (41 years) and experience (20 years) to record 10 phlebotomy days, the first with prioritized and the latter with nonprioritized patients. Each acquired daily data for the number of attended patients, age, gender, frequency of nontourniquet usage, and punctured vein. To test our work hypothesis we used the two-tailed single sample -test. Differences between age-group means and nontourniquet use means by each phlebotomist were tested by two-tailed -test for independent means.  In 10 phlebotomy days, 683 patients were attended (males 43.2%). We found no statistically significant difference between age-group means. The combined capability of nontourniquet use was 50.5%, which did not differ from our null hypothesis, but the difference in individual group means was statistically significant, the means being 33% and 66.9% (prioritized vs. nonprioritized). The medial cubital vein was the most prone to be punctured (77.7%).  Performing phlebotomies without tourniquet was possible in at least half of the attended patients, though it was more limited in specific group populations.

摘要

放血指南尽可能不鼓励使用止血带。我们评估了采血人员在静脉采血时不使用止血带的能力,假设其等于所服务患者的50%,并确定最常穿刺的静脉部位。

我们安排了两名年龄相同(41岁)且经验相同(20年)的采血人员记录10个采血日,第一个采血日优先为患者采血,第二个采血日为非优先患者采血。每人获取每日所服务患者数量、年龄、性别、不使用止血带的频率以及穿刺静脉的相关数据。为检验我们的工作假设,我们使用了双尾单样本t检验。每位采血人员所采患者年龄组均值与不使用止血带均值之间的差异,通过双尾独立样本t检验进行检验。

在10个采血日中,共服务了683名患者(男性占43.2%)。我们发现年龄组均值之间无统计学显著差异。不使用止血带的综合能力为50.5%,与我们的零假设无差异,但各分组均值之间的差异具有统计学显著性,优先患者组均值为33%,非优先患者组均值为66.9%。肘正中静脉最常被穿刺(77.7%)。

在至少一半的所服务患者中可以不使用止血带进行放血操作,尽管在特定人群中这种操作更受限制。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

3
Preanalytic Factors Associated With Hemolysis in Emergency Department Blood Samples.急诊血样溶血的分析前相关因素。
Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2018 Feb;142(2):229-235. doi: 10.5858/arpa.2016-0400-OA. Epub 2017 Nov 6.
4
Laboratory Diagnostics and Quality of Blood Collection.实验室诊断与血液采集质量
J Med Biochem. 2015 Jul;34(3):288-294. doi: 10.2478/jomb-2014-0043. Epub 2015 Jul 14.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验