Luño José, Varas Javier, Ramos Rosa, Merello Ignacio, Aljama Pedro, MartinMalo Alejandro, Pascual Julio, Praga Manuel
Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain.
Fresenius Medical Care of Spain, Madrid, Spain.
Kidney Int Rep. 2017 Mar 7;2(4):665-675. doi: 10.1016/j.ekir.2017.03.001. eCollection 2017 Jul.
Although several studies suggest that the prognosis of hypertensive dialysis patients can be improved by using antihypertensive drug therapy, it is unknown whether the prescription of a particular class or combination of antihypertensive drugs is beneficial during hemodialysis.
We performed a propensity score matching study to compare the effectiveness of various classes of antihypertensive drugs on cardiovascular (CV) mortality in 2518 incident hemodialysis patients in Spain. The patients had initially received antihypertensive therapy with a renin-angiotensin system (RAS) blocker (728 patients), a ß-blocker (679 patients), antihypertensive drugs other than a RAS blocker or a ß-blocker (787 patients), or the combination of a ß-blocker and a RAS inhibitor (324 patients). These patients were followed for a maximum of 5 years (median: 2.21 yr; range: 1.04-3.34 yr).
After adjustment for baseline CV risk covariates, no significant differences were observed in the risk of CV mortality between patients taking a RAS blocker and patients treated with ß-blocker-based antihypertensive therapy. The combination of a RAS blocker with a ß-blocker was associated with better CV survival than either agent alone (RAS blocker: hazard ratio [HR]: 1.68; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.05-2.69; ß-blocker: HR: 1.59; 95% CI: 1.01-2.50; antihypertensive medication other than a RAS blocker or ß-blocker: HR: 1.67; 95% CI: 1.08-2.58).
Our data suggested that the combination of a RAS blocker and a ß-blocker could improve survival in hemodialysis patients. Further prospective randomized controlled trials are necessary to confirm the beneficial effects of this combination of antihypertensive drugs in patients undergoing hemodialysis.
尽管多项研究表明,使用抗高血压药物治疗可改善高血压透析患者的预后,但在血液透析期间,特定类别或联合使用的抗高血压药物处方是否有益尚不清楚。
我们进行了一项倾向评分匹配研究,以比较各类抗高血压药物对西班牙2518例新发血液透析患者心血管(CV)死亡率的有效性。这些患者最初接受了肾素-血管紧张素系统(RAS)阻滞剂抗高血压治疗(728例患者)、β受体阻滞剂(679例患者)、RAS阻滞剂或β受体阻滞剂以外的抗高血压药物(787例患者),或β受体阻滞剂与RAS抑制剂联合治疗(324例患者)。这些患者随访时间最长为5年(中位数:2.21年;范围:1.04 - 3.34年)。
在对基线CV风险协变量进行调整后,服用RAS阻滞剂的患者与接受基于β受体阻滞剂的抗高血压治疗的患者在CV死亡风险方面未观察到显著差异。RAS阻滞剂与β受体阻滞剂联合使用比单独使用任何一种药物都具有更好的CV生存率(RAS阻滞剂:风险比[HR]:1.68;95%置信区间[CI] 1.05 - 2.69;β受体阻滞剂:HR:1.59;95% CI:1.01 - 2.50;RAS阻滞剂或β受体阻滞剂以外的抗高血压药物:HR:1.67;95% CI:1.08 - 2.58)。
我们的数据表明,RAS阻滞剂与β受体阻滞剂联合使用可提高血液透析患者的生存率。需要进一步的前瞻性随机对照试验来证实这种抗高血压药物联合使用对接受血液透析患者的有益效果。