Zanderigo Francesca, Kang Yeona, Kumar Dileep, Nikolopoulou Anastasia, Mozley P David, Kothari Paresh J, He Bin, Schlyer David, Rapoport Stanley I, Oquendo Maria A, Vallabhajosula Shankar, Mann J John, Sublette M Elizabeth
Molecular Imaging and Neuropathology Division, New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York, New York.
Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University, New York, New York.
Synapse. 2018 Feb;72(2). doi: 10.1002/syn.22018. Epub 2017 Nov 27.
Arachidonic acid (AA) is involved in signal transduction, neuroinflammation, and production of eicosanoid metabolites. The AA brain incorporation coefficient (K*) is quantifiable in vivo using [ C]AA positron emission tomography, although repeatability remains undetermined. We evaluated K* estimates obtained with population-based metabolite correction (PBMC) and image-derived input function (IDIF) in comparison to arterial blood-based estimates, and compared repeatability. Eleven healthy volunteers underwent a [ C]AA scan; five repeated the scan 6 weeks later, simulating a pre- and post-treatment study design. For all scans, arterial blood was sampled to measure [ C]AA plasma radioactivity. Plasma [ C]AA parent fraction was measured in 5 scans. K* was quantified using both blood data and IDIF, corrected for [ C]AA parent fraction using both PBMC (from published values) and individually measured values (when available). K* repeatability was calculated in the test-retest subset. K* estimates based on blood and individual metabolites were highly correlated with estimates using PBMC with arterial input function (r = 0.943) or IDIF (r = 0.918) in the subset with measured metabolites. In the total dataset, using PBMC, IDIF-based estimates were moderately correlated with arterial input function-based estimates (r = 0.712). PBMC and IDIF-based K* estimates were ∼6.4% to ∼11.9% higher, on average, than blood-based estimates. Average K* test-retest absolute percent difference values obtained using blood data or IDIF, assuming PBMC for both, were between 6.7% and 13.9%, comparable to other radiotracers. Our results support the possibility of simplified [ C]AA data acquisition through eliminating arterial blood sampling and metabolite analysis, while retaining comparable repeatability and validity.
花生四烯酸(AA)参与信号转导、神经炎症以及类二十烷酸代谢产物的生成。尽管重复性仍未确定,但使用[ C]AA正电子发射断层扫描可在体内对AA脑摄取系数(K*)进行量化。我们评估了基于群体代谢物校正(PBMC)和图像衍生输入函数(IDIF)获得的K估计值,并与基于动脉血的估计值进行比较,同时比较了重复性。11名健康志愿者接受了[ C]AA扫描;其中5人在6周后重复扫描,模拟治疗前和治疗后的研究设计。对于所有扫描,采集动脉血以测量[ C]AA血浆放射性。在5次扫描中测量了血浆[ C]AA母体分数。使用血液数据和IDIF对K进行量化,并使用PBMC(根据已发表的值)和单独测量的值(如有可用)对[ C]AA母体分数进行校正。在重测子集中计算K重复性。在有测量代谢物的子集中,基于血液和个体代谢物的K估计值与使用PBMC和动脉输入函数(r = 0.943)或IDIF(r = 0.918)的估计值高度相关。在整个数据集中,使用PBMC时,基于IDIF的估计值与基于动脉输入函数的估计值呈中度相关(r = 0.712)。基于PBMC和IDIF的K估计值平均比基于血液的估计值高约6.4%至约11.9%。假设两者均使用PBMC,使用血液数据或IDIF获得的平均K重测绝对百分比差值在6.7%至13.9%之间,与其他放射性示踪剂相当。我们的结果支持通过消除动脉血采样和代谢物分析来简化[ C]AA数据采集的可能性,同时保持相当的重复性和有效性。