Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; McLean Hospital, Belmont, MA.
Departments of Psychiatry and Neurology, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH.
Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2018 Feb;26(2):150-159. doi: 10.1016/j.jagp.2017.08.013. Epub 2017 Oct 10.
To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of 6 months of treatment with lurasidone in older adults with a diagnosis of bipolar I depression.
Post-hoc analysis of a multicenter, 6-month, open-label extension study.
Outpatient.
Patients aged 55 to 75 years with a DSM-IV-TR diagnosis of bipolar I depression who had completed 6 weeks of double-blind, placebo-controlled treatment with either lurasidone monotherapy (1 study) or adjunctive therapy with lithium or valproate (2 studies).
Flexible doses of lurasidone, 20 to 120 mg/day, either as monotherapy, or adjunctive with lithium or valproate.
Effectiveness was assessed using the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS; change from open-label-baseline to month-6, observed case analysis).
A total of 141 older adults entered the extension study (monotherapy, N = 55; 39%; adjunctive therapy, N = 86; 61%). At the end of 6 months of open-label treatment with lurasidone, as monotherapy or adjunctive therapy, minimal changes were observed in the older adult sample in mean weight (-1.0 kg and -0.4 kg, respectively); and median total cholesterol (-2.0 mg/dL and +6.0 md/dL, respectively), triglycerides (+2.5 mg/dL and +6.0 mg/dL, respectively), and HbA1c (0.0% and -0.1%, respectively). Patients treated with 6 months of lurasidone showed a mean improvement on the MADRS in both the monotherapy (-6.2) and adjunctive therapy (-6.7) groups.
Results of these post-hoc analyses found that up to 7.5 months of lurasidone treatment for bipolar depression in older adults was associated with minimal effects on weight and metabolic parameters, with low rates of switching to hypomania or mania, and was well tolerated. The antidepressant effectiveness of lurasidone in this age group was maintained over the 6-month treatment period.
评估利鲁唑治疗 55 至 75 岁双相 I 型抑郁症患者 6 个月的安全性和有效性。
多中心、6 个月、开放性延伸研究的事后分析。
门诊。
符合 DSM-IV-TR 双相 I 型抑郁症诊断标准、年龄在 55 至 75 岁之间的患者,他们已经完成了 6 周的双盲、安慰剂对照治疗,使用的是利鲁唑单药治疗(1 项研究)或锂盐或丙戊酸盐的辅助治疗(2 项研究)。
利鲁唑的灵活剂量,20 至 120 毫克/天,无论是单药治疗还是与锂盐或丙戊酸盐联合治疗。
使用蒙哥马利-阿斯伯格抑郁评定量表(MADRS;从开放标签基线到第 6 个月的变化,观察性病例分析)评估疗效。
共有 141 名老年人进入了扩展研究(单药治疗,N=55;39%;辅助治疗,N=86;61%)。在利鲁唑开放标签治疗 6 个月后,无论是单药治疗还是辅助治疗,老年患者样本的平均体重(分别为-1.0 公斤和-0.4 公斤)和中位数总胆固醇(分别为-2.0 毫克/分升和+6.0 毫克/分升)、甘油三酯(分别为+2.5 毫克/分升和+6.0 毫克/分升)和 HbA1c(分别为 0.0%和-0.1%)的变化均较小。接受 6 个月利鲁唑治疗的患者在单药治疗(-6.2)和辅助治疗(-6.7)组的 MADRS 上均有平均改善。
这些事后分析的结果发现,在老年人中使用利鲁唑治疗双相抑郁症长达 7.5 个月与体重和代谢参数的微小影响有关,转躁狂或躁狂的发生率较低,并且耐受性良好。在 6 个月的治疗期间,利鲁唑在该年龄组的抗抑郁效果得以维持。