Suppr超能文献

新型非典型抗精神病药物治疗双相情感障碍的药理与临床概况综述:老年患者用药考量

A Review of the Pharmacological and Clinical Profile of Newer Atypical Antipsychotics as Treatments for Bipolar Disorder: Considerations for Use in Older Patients.

作者信息

Vasudev Akshya, Chaudhari Sumit, Sethi Rickinder, Fu Rachel, Sandieson Rachel M, Forester Brent P

机构信息

Division of Geriatric Psychiatry, Department of Psychiatry, Western University, London, ON, Canada.

Department of Medicine, Western University, London, ON, Canada.

出版信息

Drugs Aging. 2018 Oct;35(10):887-895. doi: 10.1007/s40266-018-0579-6.

Abstract

Bipolar disorder prevalence rates vary in the older adult population (defined as age ≥ 65 years), ranging from 1% in community dwellers to as high as 8-10% in hospital inpatients. Although older agents, including lithium and valproic acid, offer significant antimanic efficacy, as supported by a recent randomized controlled trial (RCT), there is growing interest in using atypical antipsychotics to treat bipolar disorder in older adults. Newer atypical antipsychotics are of interest based on their tolerability and efficacy in the general adult bipolar population. The aim of this review was to systematically examine efficacy and tolerability of newer atypical antipsychotics for older adult bipolar disorder (OABD). We conducted a systematic search utilizing the MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO and Cochrane Library electronic databases, with the aim of identifying all RCTs comparing newer atypical antipsychotics approved by the US FDA since 2002 (including brexpiprazole, cariprazine, lurasidone, iloperidone, asenapine, paliperidone, and aripiprazole) with placebo or another comparator, in the treatment of any phase of bipolar disorder (including mania, depression or mixed episodes while used as an acute or maintenance treatment) in older adults (> 65 years). We found no RCT data on any of the examined agents. Hence, we changed our search criteria to include studies with a lower age cut-off (≥ 55 years), as well as the inclusion of post hoc studies. Two post hoc studies on lurasidone suggest its reasonable safety and efficacy profile in the acute and maintenance treatment of OABD; however, there are no pharmacoeconomic data on the use of lurasidone in the treatment of OABD. Research data from open-label studies on oral asenapine and aripiprazole as add-on therapy suggest that these two agents are adequately tolerated and improved symptoms of depression and mania in OABD; hence, there is an urgent need to conduct RCTs on these two agents. Lastly, we found no studies for the treatment of OABD with brexpiprazole, cariprazine, iloperidone, or paliperidone.

摘要

双相情感障碍在老年人群(定义为年龄≥65岁)中的患病率有所不同,社区居民中的患病率为1%,而住院患者中的患病率高达8 - 10%。尽管包括锂盐和丙戊酸在内的传统药物具有显著的抗躁狂疗效,这一点在最近一项随机对照试验(RCT)中得到了证实,但使用非典型抗精神病药物治疗老年双相情感障碍的兴趣正日益增加。基于其在一般成年双相情感障碍人群中的耐受性和疗效,新型非典型抗精神病药物受到关注。本综述的目的是系统地研究新型非典型抗精神病药物治疗老年双相情感障碍(OABD)的疗效和耐受性。我们利用MEDLINE、EMBASE、PsycINFO和Cochrane图书馆电子数据库进行了系统检索,目的是找出所有比较自2002年以来美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)批准的新型非典型抗精神病药物(包括布雷哌唑、卡立普唑、鲁拉西酮、伊潘立酮、阿塞那平、帕利哌酮和阿立哌唑)与安慰剂或其他对照药物,用于治疗老年(>65岁)双相情感障碍任何阶段(包括躁狂、抑郁或混合发作,用作急性或维持治疗)的RCT。我们未找到关于任何一种被研究药物的RCT数据。因此,我们改变了检索标准,纳入年龄下限较低(≥55岁)的研究以及事后分析研究。两项关于鲁拉西酮的事后分析研究表明,其在OABD的急性和维持治疗中具有合理的安全性和疗效;然而,关于鲁拉西酮用于治疗OABD的药物经济学数据尚无。关于口服阿塞那平及阿立哌唑作为附加治疗的开放标签研究的研究数据表明,这两种药物耐受性良好,可改善OABD的抑郁和躁狂症状;因此,迫切需要对这两种药物进行RCT。最后,我们未找到关于使用布雷哌唑、卡立普唑、伊潘立酮或帕利哌酮治疗OABD的研究。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验